Advanced Search Results
Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-17-2005
ConstitutionService Tax
Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 116 and 117; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 158; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rules 2(1); Service Tax (Amendment) Rules, 1997; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 64(3), 65, 65(5), 65(28), 65(41), 66, 66(3), 67, 68, 68(1), 69, 69(2), 69(5), 70, 70(1), 71, 71A, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 and 94; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 68(1A) and 84; Finance Act, 1998; Service Tax (Amendment) Rules, 1998; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 246(1); Punjab Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1952 - Sections 3(3); Service Tax Act, 1994
AIR2005SC3020; (2005)4CompLJ440(SC); (2005)194CTR(SC)428; 2005(99)ECC377; 2005(182)ELT33(SC); [2005]274ITR194(SC); JT2005(Suppl3)SC389; (2005)4SCC214; 2006[3]STR608; 200
the constitutional validity of Sections 116 and 117 of the Finance Act 2000 and Section 158 of the Finance Act, 2003 by which the decision of this Court in Laghu Udyog Bharati and Anr. v. Union of India and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR. Piyarelall Import and Export Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the ...
Mumbai
May-05-2006
Constitution
Destructive Insects and Pests (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1992 - Sections 4 and 11; Companies Act, 1956; Destructive Insects and Pests Act, 1914 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 3(3); Inter-State Water Disputes Act; Karnataka State Civil Services (Regulation of Promotion, Pay and Pension) Act, 1973 - Sections 11(2); Cess and Other Taxes on Minerals (Validation) Act, 1992; M.M.R.D. Act - Sections 2 and 2(1); Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 116 and 117; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 158; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(5), 66, 66(3), 68(1), 68(1A) and 71; Finance (Amendment) Act, 1997; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rule 2(1); Plants, Fruits and Seeds (Regulation of Import into India) Order, 1989; Karnataka Cauvery Basin Irrigation Protection Ordinance, 1991
2006(4)BomCR637; [2006(3)JCR181]; 2006(6)MhLj123
is whether by enacting Sections 116 and 117 of the Finance Act, 2000 and Section 158 of the Finance Act, 2003, the bases on which this Court struck down Rule 2(1)(d), (xii) and (xvii) of the Service Tax Rules,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSalem Textiles Limited 'B' unit rep. by Its General Manager (Tech), Mr ...
Chennai
Jan-02-2008
Other Taxes
Tamil Nadu Tax on Consumption or Sale of Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2007 - Sections 2(7); Tamil Nadu Tax on Consumption or Sale of Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(2A), 2(7), 2(8), 3, 3(1), 6, 20 and 20(1); Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 158; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65(5), 66(3) and 68; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 116 and 117; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rule 2(1)
(2008)1MLJ844
a proposition of law, this cannot be and is not disputed. The question is whether by enacting Sections 116 and 117 of the Finance Act, 2000 and Section 158 of the Finance Act, 2003, the bases on … an Amendment Act. While dealing with the said Amendment Act, it was held that the object of the Finance Act, 2003, which has in effect amended Section 65(5), 66(3) and 68 of Finance Act, 1994 was to nullify the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Greenply Industries Ltd. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Feb-22-2006
Service Tax
(2006)(111)ECC151
recourse to retrospective amendments.7. Having noticed the loophole in the provisions, a further amendment was brought by the Finance Act, 2003. Section 158 of the Finance Act, 2003 retrospectively amended the Section 68 and sought to insert a new Section … the Order-in-Original. Hence, this appeal.3. Learned Advocate appearing for the appellants submits that the amendment carried out by Section 116 and 117 of Finance Act, 2000 was to bring the GTO services into net of service tax and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMount Shivalik Industries Ltd. Vs. Cce and C
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Feb-22-2006
Service Tax
recourse to retrospective amendments.6. Having noticed the loophole in the provisions, a further amendment was brought by the Finance Act, 2003. Section 158 of the Finance Act, 2003 retrospectively amended the Section 68 and sought to insert a new Section … the Order-in-original. Hence, this appeal.3. Learned Advocate appearing for the appellants submits that the amendment carried out by Section 116 and 117 of Finance Act, 2000 was to bring the GTO services into net of service tax and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCheyyar Co-op. Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Mar-20-2008
Service Tax
(2008)14STJ54CESTAT(Chennai)
period were filed and the tax paid within the period of time prescribed for the purpose under the Finance Act, 2003. Such payment of tax was made under protest. Later on, it appears, the party filed a refund claim, … Supreme Court's ruling, Parliament amended Section 65 ibid in relation to the limited period, 16.07.1997 to 16.10.1998 under Section 116 of the Finance Act, 2000, whereby recipients of 'Goods Transport' service and 'Clearing and Forwarding' service were defined
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce Vs. Super Sales Agencies Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Nov-22-2004
Service Tax
(2005)(119)LC192Tri(Chennai)
as validly and effectively taken or done" vide Section 117 of the Finance Act, 2000. Later on, the Finance Act, 2003, make certain amendments to the Service Tax provisions of the Finance Act, 1994, whereby the aforesaid assessees were … Supreme Court's ruling, Parliament amended Section 65 ibid in relation to the limited period, 16.7.1997 to 16.10.1998 under Section 116 of the Finance Act, 2000, whereby recipients of 'Goods Transport' service and 'Clearing and Forwarding' service were defined
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Vishnuram Textiles Pvt. Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Nov-22-2004
Service Tax
(2004)(98)ECC129
as validly and effectively taken or done" vide Section 117 of the Finance Act, 2000. Later on, the Finance Act, 2003, made certain amendments to the Service Tax provisions of the Finance Act, 1994, whereby the aforesaid assessees were … Supreme Court's ruling, Parliament amended Section 65 ibid in relation to the limited period, 16.7.1997 to 16.10.1998 under Section 116 of the Finance Act, 2000, whereby recipients of 'Goods Transport' service and 'Clearing and Forwarding' service were defined
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNava Bharat Ferro Alloys Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Andhra Pradesh
Jan-27-2005
Service Tax
Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 65(7), 65(18A), 65(18B), 65(48), 116 and 117; Finance Act, 1997; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 66 68, 70, 71A and 94; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 68, 68(1), 69, 70, 71 and 71A; Assam Taxation (On Goods Carried by Road or on Inland Waterways) Act; Central Tea Act - Sections 3(1) and 3(2); Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 43, 43(1), 43(1A) and 44; Rajasthan Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1959 - Sections 3 and 4; Karnataka Entertainments Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2; Expenditure Tax Act, 1987; British North America Act, 1867 - Sections 91 and 92; Finance Act, 1998 - Sections 65, 65(16), 65(17), 65(41) and 66(3); Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 84; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rule 2 and 2(1); Service Tax (Amendm
(2005)186CTR(AP)451; 2005(185)ELT236(AP); 2006[3]STR565
of tax, but extended the time to file returns till 28.11.2003. Further amendments however, were carried out in Finance Act, 2003 in order to validate the imposition of tax from 16.7.1997 to 2.6.1998 and to remove the basic infirmities … to this argument, it is necessary to reproduce the amendments that were affected to the Finance Act in 2003. Section 68 in 2003 Act reads as under:Section 68 : Payment of service tax.-Provided that-(i) in relation to services … Ltd. v. Union of India and Another, wherein the legality of Sections 116 and 117 of the Finance Act, 2000, was challenged. The Supreme Court
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Eid Parry Confectionery Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Oct-20-2004
Service Tax
(2005)(179)ELT447Tri(Chennai)
as validly and effectively taken or done" vide Section 117 of the Finance Act, 2000. Later on, the Finance Act, 2003, made certain amendments to the Service tax provisions of the Finance Act, 1994, whereby the aforesaid assessees were … Supreme Court's ruling, Parliament amended Section 65 ibid in relation to the limited period 16-7-1997 to 16-10-1998 under Section 116 of the Finance Act, 2000, whereby recipients of 'Goods Transport' service and 'Clearing and Forwarding' service were defined
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »