Advanced Search Results

All India Tax Payers Welfare Association Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 66, 68, 68(1), 70, 71A and 83; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 1B, 9C, 9D, 11, 11BB, 11C, 11D, 12, 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 12E, 14, 15, 35F, 35D, 35E, 36, 36A, 36B, 37A, 37B, 37C, 37O, and 40; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 66, 669(1) and 68; Finance Act, 2004 - Sections 83; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 9C, 9D, 11, 11B, 11BB, 11C, 11D, 12, 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 12E, 14, 15, 35F to 35O, 35Q, 36, 36A, 36B, 37A, 37B, 37C, 37D and 40; Service Tax Rules, 1997 - Rules 2, 12 and 17

Reported in : (2006)205CTR(Mad)360; 2006[4]STR14

let us look into the relevant provisions of the Act for disposal of this writ petition:Section 68 of Finance Act, 2003 : Every person providing taxable service to any person shall pay Service Tax at the rate specified in … be in relation to service tax as they apply in relation to a duty of Excise (9C, 9D, 11, 1B, (11BB), 11C, 11D, 12, 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 12E,, 14, 15, 35F, to 35D, 35E, 36, 36A,

Dharmpal Satyapal Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 9, 11, 11A and 35F; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 154 and 154(3); Finance Act, 1982 - Sections 51; Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 - Sections 39 and 39(5); Small Causes Courts Act - Sections 17; Court-fees Act - Sections 6; Customs Act; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1), 9 and 49; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 226

8.7.1999..The Union of India preferred SLP (c) No. 4131-34/2003 against the judgment in writ appeal.14.5.2003 : By the Finance Act, 2003, the benefit of Notification No. 32/1999 dated 8.7.1999, withdrawn from its inception viz. from 8.7.1999 to 28.2.2001 for … of the order. The petitioners received the same on 5.4.2004.23.4.2004 : Notice of attachment of excisable goods under Section 11 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise having jurisdiction over the

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-i Vs. Joint Secretary(Revisionar ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Excise

under section 136 of the Finance Act, 2001 (14 of 2001), as amended by Section 169 of the Finance Act, 2003 (32 of 2003) and further amended by Section 3 of the Finance Act, 2004 (13 of 2004); (e) … export directly from the registered factory in which such goods are produced, accompanied by an invoice under rule 11 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002: Provided that the manufacturer or processor may procure materials from dealers registered

Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionService Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 116 and 117; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 158; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rules 2(1); Service Tax (Amendment) Rules, 1997; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 64(3), 65, 65(5), 65(28), 65(41), 66, 66(3), 67, 68, 68(1), 69, 69(2), 69(5), 70, 70(1), 71, 71A, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 and 94; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 68(1A) and 84; Finance Act, 1998; Service Tax (Amendment) Rules, 1998; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 246(1); Punjab Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1952 - Sections 3(3); Service Tax Act, 1994

Reported in : AIR2005SC3020; (2005)4CompLJ440(SC); (2005)194CTR(SC)428; 2005(99)ECC377; 2005(182)ELT33(SC); [2005]274ITR194(SC); JT2005(Suppl3)SC389; (2005)4SCC214; 2006[3]STR608; 200

the constitutional validity of Sections 116 and 117 of the Finance Act 2000 and Section 158 of the Finance Act, 2003 by which the decision of this Court in Laghu Udyog Bharati and Anr. v. Union of India and … Ruma Pal, J.1. These writ petitions have been filed challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 116 and 117 of the Finance Act 2000 and Section 158 of the Finance Act, 2003 by which the

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales TaxMedia and Communication

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11; Constitution (46th Amendment) Act, 1982; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 32, 131, 136, 141, 226, 246(1), 248(1), 286, 366, 366(12) and 366(29A); Customs Act - Sections 2(22); Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65(16), 65(72) and 66; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 149(90) and 149(92); Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 159(104), 159(105), 159(110) and 159 (111); Government of India Act, 1935; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 11 and 12; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963; Madhya Bharat Sales Tax Act, 1950; Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act - Sections 2; Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 2(7); State Sales Tax Act; Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 - Sections 2; Telegr

Reported in : AIR2006SC1383; (2006)4CompLJ330(SC); (2006)201CTR(SC)346; [2006]282ITR273(SC); JT2006(3)SC114; 2006(2)SCALE752; (2006)3SCC1; [2006]145STC91(SC); 2006[2]STR161; [2006]152; [2006] 2 SCR 823

The liability of service providers to service tax was continued under Section 159(105)(110) (b) and (111) of the Finance Act, 2003. The definition of subscriber was added in sub Section (104) as meaning 'a person to whom any service … judicata.In our opinion, constructive res judicata which is a special and artificial form of res judicata enacted by Section 11 of the Civil Procedure Code should not generally be applied to writ petitions filed under Article 32 or

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Suretech Hospital and Research

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)104TTJ(Nag.)869

learned Counsel. Respectfully following the judgments cited above and Expln. 4 to Section 271(1)(c) which was amended by Finance Act, 2002, I am of the opinion that the said amendment is applicable from 1st April, 2003. The provisions … ITA No. 12/Nag/2004 in the case of Mehta Cast Iron (P) Ltd., Nagpur dt.23rd Sept., 2005 and also 11/Nag/2004 Asstt. CIT v. Parashwa Engg. (P) Ltd. and it was stated that in the penalty proceedings, the question

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2010]186TAXMAN460(All)

exemption under Section 11 of the Act, it should have filed the application for registration immediately after the Finance Act, 2002 came into force i.e., 1-4-2003. No reason had been given for the delay from 1-4-2003 till 27-3-2006

Kushal Fertilisers (P) Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Customs and Centra ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CompanyExcise

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 11A(1), 35C, 35G, 35G(1) and 35G(3); Finance Act, 1996 - Sections 70; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 144; Customs Act, 1944 - Sections 11A; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 174 and 209A

Reported in : 2009(167)LC1(SC); 2009(238)ELT21(SC); 2009(7)SCALE476; (2009)13SCC515:2009AIRSCW4416

the Act provided for a reference. However, the said provision was also substituted by Section 144 of the Finance Act, 2003 (Act No. 32 of 2003), relevant provisions whereof read as under:35G. Appeal to High Court (1) An appeal … issued on or about 28th March, 1994, proposing demand of Central Excise Duty of Rs. 57,80,363/- under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short `the Act') and also asking the appellant to show cause

Saint-gobaIn Glass India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Customs

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Customs Tariff Tax, 1975 - Sections 8B, 8C, 8C(2) and 8C(6); Finance Act, 2003; Customs Tariff (Transitional Product Specific Safeguard Duty) Rules - Rules 1, 2, 3, 4, 4(5), 5, 5(2), 5(3), 5(4), 6, 6(2), 6(3), 6(4), 6(5), 6(7), 6(8), 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 309 and 311(2)

Reported in : 2009(166)LC71(Delhi); 2009(240)ELT495(Del)

available to the Government of India. A specific provision i.e., Section 8C was introduced in the Act by Finance Act, 2003 w.e.f. 11.05.2002 in respect of specific safeguards duty with regard to imports from China. Under Sub-section (6) of

Pawan Kumar and ors. Vs. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 8, 11, 14, 27, 50(2), 111, 104, 113, 123, 132, 135, 135(1), 135(2), 136, 136(1) and 136(2); Finance Act, 2003; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 43B; Finance Act, 1987; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 107; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Sections 18 and 67

Reported in : 2007(94)DRJ566; 2007(218)ELT331(Del)

135 of the Customs Act. This submission was based on the amendment in the Act made by the Finance Act, 2003, which had brought in the activities of fraudulent claim of duty drawback within the four corners of punishing … to be exported makes such goods prohibited in terms of Section 18 and 67 of FERA read with Section 11 and 50(2) of the Customs Act and hence, punishable under Section 135 of the Act. The learned ACMM