Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2002 section 73 · Page 1 of about 1,783 results (0.080 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 20 2004

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Eid Parry Confectionery Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Oct-20-2004

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2005)(179)ELT447Tri(Chennai)

[1999 (112) E.L.T. 365 (S.C.)]. Even otherwise, Counsel submits, both the demands are barred by limitation prescribed under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994. The SDR has reiterated the findings in the impugned orders.5. I have carefully … assessees submits that, as the subject show cause notices were received after 12-5-2000 (the date on which the Finance Act, 2000 received Presidential assent), the demands of Service tax raised therein are hit by the Apex Court's ruling

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 2005

Karvy Consultants Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Commr. of Cus. and C. Ex.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-08-2005

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Sections 45, 45(1) and 45I; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 73(1), 75, 76, 77 and 78; Companies Act; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65(11), 65(73) and 65(90); Finance Act, 2002; Finance Act, 2004

Reported in : 2006[]STR7

Sub-clause (zp) was omitted by Finance Act of 2004 with effect from 10-9-2004.8. Sub-clause (zp) as incorporated by Finance Act, 2002 with effect from 16-8-2002 and Sub-clause (zm) as amended by Finance Act, 2004 with effect from 10-9-2004 read … ORDER1. In this writ petition the petitioner seeks a declaration that Section 65(90) read with 65(11) of the Finance Act, 2001 has no application to the petitioner company upto 16-8-2002 … to 15-8-2002, on account of providing taxable services under proviso to Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994.(ii) Interest should not be paid by them

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 24 2006

Punjab State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation Limited Vs. U ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-24-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80P, 80P(2), 139, 143, 143(2), 147 to 149, 153 and 153(2); Finance (Amendment) Act, 2006; Finance (Amendment) Act, 2002; Direct Tax Laws (Second Amendment) Act, 1989; Finance Act, 1989; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 73; Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959; Madras General Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1967; Income Tax Rules - Rule 350A

Reported in : (2006)206CTR(P& H)194; [2007]290ITR15(P& H)

to Sub-section (2) of Section 143, as it stood immediately before the amendment of said sub-section by the Finance Act, 2002 (20 of 2002) but before the expiry of the time-limit for makmg the assessment, reassessment or recomputation as … retrospective effect in the light of which earlier judgment becomes irrelevant.A somewhat similar situation arose in connection with Section 73 of the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 which allowed the municipality to levy 'a rate on buildings or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 05 2007

Commr. of Income Tax Vs. Gujarat Maritime Board

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-05-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Gujarat Maritime Board Act, 1981 - Sections 3(2), 25, 26, 73, 74 and 75; General Clause Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(15), 10(20), 11, 11(1), 11(4), 11(16), 12A and 60 to 63; Finance Act, 2002; Gujarat Maritime Board Act, 1981; Indian Ports Act, 1903 - Sections 36; Banking Companies Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking Act, 1970 - Sections 2; Public Trust Act

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(SC)81; [2007]295ITR561(SC); 2007(14)SCALE21; 2007AIRSCW7912; 2008(3)KCCRSN199

income of the Board was not eligible to income-tax under Section 10(20) or the Income-tax Act, 1961.3. By finance Act, 2002, an Explanation was added in Section 10(20) by which 'Local Authority' was defined. It gave a restricted meaning … fund called the General Account of the Minor Ports.74. (1) The moneys credited to the general account under Section 73 shall be applied by the Board in payment of the following charges, namely: (a) the interest and instalments

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 2009

Sanghi Polyesters Limited Vs. the Superintendent of Central Excise and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-25-2009

Subject : Excise

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1944 - Sections 11, 11A, 11AB and 11D; Central Boards of Revenue Act, 1963; Finance Act - Sections 73 and 75; Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Rule 8, 8(3A), 8(3) and 8(4); CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - Rules 3, 3(1), 3(4) and 14; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2010(1)ALT492; 2009(172)LC39(AP)

the provisions of Sections 11-A and 11-AB of the Excise Act or Sections 73 and 75 of the Finance Act, shall apply mutatis mutandis for effecting such recoveries.13. The admitted facts of this case show that the dispute … writ petition for a Mandamus to declare that Sub-rule (3A) of Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 (for short, 'the Rules') is not retrospective and for a consequential declaration that the demand of duty of … i.e., finished products, inputs, raw material etc., by invoking his powers under Section 11 of the Act. It is this order, which is assailed in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 06 2007

Cce Vs. Jaiswal Equipment and Holdings

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jun-06-2007

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)7STR665

had elaborately dealt with the effect of introduction of Section 71A of the Finance Act, 2003 and also Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1944, as amended by the Finance Act, 2003, and held that, the liability to … the Service Tax calculated thereon was Rs. 9,981/-. As no return was filed under Section 70 of the Finance Act, 1994 and material facts were not disclosed, show cause notice was issued to the respondent on 22.11.2002 for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2006

Jindal thermal Power Company Limited (Formerly Jindal Tracteble Power ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-31-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 10, 10A, 10B, 11, 12, 80HHC, 80HHC(3), 80HHF(3), 112, 113, 115A, 115AA, 115AB, 115ACA, 115AD, 115B, 115BB, 115BBA, 115E, 115JB, 119(2), 140A, 154, 161(1A), 164, 164A, 167B, 172(4), 174(2), 175, 176(2), 192, 207, 208 to 219, 234A, 234B and 234C; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 115J, 115J(1), 115JA, 115JB(1) and 115JB; Finance Act, 1987; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1996; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections115B and 115JB; Finance (Amendment) Act, 2000; Finance (Amendment) Act, 2002; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 210; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3, 17(1), 32(2), 32A(3), 72(1), 73, 74, 74A(3), 139(1), 142(1) and 288(2); Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 2(8); Constitution of India - Articles 265 and 300A

Reported in : (2006)203CTR(Kar)381; [2006]286ITR182(KAR); [2006]286ITR182(Karn)

respondent seeks to rely as is seemingly done in view of the amendment of Section 115JB effected by Finance Act, 2002 with retrospective effect from 1.4.2001 enabling him to levy such interest. The said amendment in so far as … Section 32 or Sub-section (3) of Section 32A or Clause (ii) of Sub-section (1) of Section 72 or Section 73 or Section 74 or Sub-section (3) of Section 74A.4) Every company to which this section applies, shall furnish

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 2004

Futura Fibres and Futura Polymers Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Nov-18-2004

Subject : Service Tax

UOI [1999 (112) E.L.T. 365 (S.C.)] = (2002-TIOL-162-SC-ST). Even otherwise, the demands are barred by limitation prescribed under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994. The DR has reiterated the findings in the impugned order. Ld. Counsel has … assessees has submitted that, as the subject show-cause notices were issued after 12/05/2000 (the date on which the Finance Act, 2000 received Presidential assent), the demands of Service Tax raised therein are hit by the apex Court's ruling

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 30 2007

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Mangalam Cement Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : May-30-2007

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)7STR673

in one case (Service Tax Appeal No. 2/23 of 2005) of Rs. 60,26,508/- under Section 73(2) of the Finance Act, 1994, imposing penalty of Rs. 48,700/- under Section 76 and ordering interest amount of Rs. 8,84,287/- under Section … L.H. Sugar Factories Ltd. (supra) that the show cause notice was issued in that case in the year 2002 and it is in that context the Tribunal concluded in para 9 that the show cause notice issued

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 2005

Asiatic Industrial Gases Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Decided on : Nov-18-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

from assessment year 2003-04. 6. The Commissioner (Appeals) ought to have taken into account the Explanatory Notes to Finance Act, 2002, extract of which is reproduced below, which makes it clear that the insertion of Clause (va) to Section … officer's action of treating the loss of Rs. 8,85,485 as speculation loss within the meaning of Explanation to Section 73 of the Act. (ii) For that on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the said

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial