Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Mangalam Cement Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)7STR673

in one case (Service Tax Appeal No. 2/23 of 2005) of Rs. 60,26,508/- under Section 73(2) of the Finance Act, 1994, imposing penalty of Rs. 48,700/- under Section 76 and ordering interest amount of Rs. 8,84,287/- under Section … the show cause notice was issued in that case in the year 2002 and it is in that context the Tribunal concluded in para 9 … Revenue, since the respondents were liable to pay service tax under the amended provisions of the proviso to Section 68(1) read with Section 71A of the Act, they were required to file return in form ST-3B along with

Slocum Investment (P) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)101TTJ(Delhi)558

XIV-B of the Act. These are contained in Chapter IV to Chapter XII-G of the Act. Prior to Finance Act, 2002, amending Section 158BB(1), w.r.e.f. 1st July, 1995, only provisions of Chapter IV were applicable while computing undisclosed income. … year ending with the date of search. According to him but for this deeming provision, the provisions of Section 68 to 69-C, cannot be invoked in block assessment proceedings. He pointed out that there is no such deeming

C.C.E. Vs. Kerala State Electricity Board

Court : Kerala

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35G and 35G(3); Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rules 6 and 6(1); Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65(31), 65(105), 68, 69, 70, 73, 73(1), 75, 75A, 76, 77, 78, 94(1) and 94(2); Service Tax Act

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(Ker)97; 2006(4)KLT749; 2006[3]STR625; (2007)5VST46(Ker)

Commissioner of Central Excise noticed that the KSE Board had contravened the provisions of Section 70 of the Finance Act, 1994 by not filing the prescribed return, Section 68 by not remitting the service tax due and Section … Board revealed that the assessee has paid an amount of 60,98,282,83 Canadian Dollars between July 1998 and December 2002 against invoices issued by the consulting firm during the period from July 1998 to December 2002 as consultancy

Commissioner of Income Central Ii Vs. Suresh N. Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 4, 4(1), 32, 32(2), 68, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C, 112, 113, 115A, 115AB, 115AC, 115ACA, 115AD, 115B, 115BB, 115BBA, 115E, 115JB, 132, 132A, 132B, 139, 139(1), 142, 142(1), 143, 143(1B), 143(2), 143(3), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 158BA, 158BA(1), 158BA(2), 158BB, 158BB(1), 158BC, 158BH, 161, 161(1A), 164, 164A, 167B, 245D and 245D(4); Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 2(1), 2(2) and 2(3); Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 113; Finance Act, 1995; Constitution of India - Articles 269, 270 and 271

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(SC)274; [2008]297ITR322(SC); JT2008(1)SC208; 2008(1)SCALE99; (2008)4SCC362; 2008AIRSCW1066

respect of the search carried out on 17.1.2001; secondly, whether the proviso inserted in Section 113 by the Finance Act, 2002 is clarificatory?Whether Finance Act, 2001 was applicable to block assessment under Chapter XIV-B up to 1.06.2002:5. Chapter XIV-B … Sub-section (1B) of Section 143.(2) In computing the undisclosed income of the block period, the provisions of Sections 68, 69, 69A, 69B and 69C shall, so far as may be, apply and references to financial year in

Cargo Clearing Agency (Gujarat) Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(7A), 3, 4, 4(1), 32(2), 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C, 113, 132, 132A, 132B, 132(5), 132(7), 139, 139(1), 139(5), 142, 142(1), 143, 143(1A), 143(1B), 143(2), 143(3), 144, 145, 147 to 153, 153(2), 158B, 158BA, 158BA(1), 158BA(2), 158BB, 158BB(1), 158BB(2), 158BC, 158BD, 158BE, 158BG, 158BH and 245D; Finance Act, 1995; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1996; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998; Finance Act, 2001; Finance Act, 2002

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(Guj)541; [2008]307ITR1(Guj)

initiated or requisitions made on or after that date.12.4. The last amendment came to be made by the Finance Act, 2002 which has been explained in Circular No. 8/2002 dated 27.08.2002. The relevant extract of the said Circular reads … computing the undisclosed income for the block period, the provisions of Sections 68, 69, 69A, 69B and 69C shall, mutatis mutandis apply and the term … Association of Persons (AOP) declaring income of Rs. 5,05,087/- came to be filed.3. On 24.11.1995 search proceedings Under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) were carried out at the residential premises of three

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … for the credit of the duty paid. This was a case falling under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act 2002. The challenge in this case was to the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra Value Added … goods falling under Chapter 82, Chapter 84, Chapter 85, Chapter 90, (heading 6805, grinding wheels and the like, and parts thereof falling under heading 6804)

NitIn P. Shah Alias Modi Vs. Dy. C.i.T.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 64(1), 66, 67, 69, 119, 131, 132, 139(1), 142(1), 143(2), 143(3), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 158BA, 158BC, 158BD, 251, 271(1) and 276CCC; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 68(1) and 68(2); Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : (2005)194CTR(Guj)306; [2005]276ITR411(Guj)

set aside, while framing fresh assessment the Assessing Officer came to the conclusion that as per provisions of Section 68(1) of the Finance Act,1997 the assessee was not entitled to immunity under VDIS in relation to the sum

J.K. Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Customs

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3, 8C, 9 and 9A to 9C; Customs Tariff (Amendment) Act, 1982; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 12, 15, 46, 58, 68, 72 and 129; Indian Tariff Act, 1934; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 8B, 8C, 8(8) and 15(1); Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 9AA; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 34; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 148; Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5 to 17, 18, 19 and 20; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 136, 226, 227, 229 and 265

Reported in : 2005(103)ECC152; 2005(186)ELT3(Raj)

special duty on imports from Peoples Republic of China was levied by inserting Section 8C w.e.f. 11-5-2002 vide Finance Act, 2002. All these new duties have come to be incorporated in the Act of 1975 as a result of … date when the bill of entry is presented before competent authority before goods are cleared from warehouse under Section 68.35. Until Section 15(1)(b) was amended vide Finance Act, 2003, the rate of duty and valuation of tariff was

Parbhudas Kishoredas Tobacco Products Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Reported in : (2009)20VST853(MP)

to them.3. In the year 1994, the Central Government imposed levy of service tax on various services by Finance Act of 1994. Provisions were made for levy, collection and other related matters of service tax. It is put … about a year, the respondent No. 2 issued notices dated December 18, 2002 demanding service tax for the period November 16, 1997 to June 1, … liable to pay freight either himself or through his agent. There is no amendment in Section 66 or Section 68 which would change the judgment of the apex court rendered in the case of Laghu Udyog Bharati [1999]

Kerala State Electricity Board Vs. Commr. of Central Excise, Thiruvana ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(31), 65(41), 66, 68, 68(1A), 68(2), 69, 69(1), 70, 71, 73, 75 and 105; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 116 and 117; Punjab Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1952 - Sections 3(3); Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rules 2(1), 6 and 6(1); Constitution of India - Article 246(1); Income Tax Act

Reported in : AIR2008SC798; (2008)214CTR(SC)87; 2007(14)SCALE311; 2008[9]STR3; (2008)12VST1(SC); 2008AIRSCW25; 2008(1)SCC780.

as to whether the appellant- Kerala State Electricity Board, the service recipient, within the meaning of provisions of Finance Act, 1994, levying service tax, is liable to pay any interest on the amount of tax due to the … for which the service tax was due is August 1998 to September 2002. Under the agreement, indisputably, the appellant was responsible to make payment of … cent of the value of taxable services specified therein and collected in such manner as may be prescribed. Section 68 of the Act puts the burden of payment of tax on the service provider.9. Sections 68(2), 69(1), 71