Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Income Central Ii Vs. Suresh N. Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 4, 4(1), 32, 32(2), 68, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C, 112, 113, 115A, 115AB, 115AC, 115ACA, 115AD, 115B, 115BB, 115BBA, 115E, 115JB, 132, 132A, 132B, 139, 139(1), 142, 142(1), 143, 143(1B), 143(2), 143(3), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 158BA, 158BA(1), 158BA(2), 158BB, 158BB(1), 158BC, 158BH, 161, 161(1A), 164, 164A, 167B, 245D and 245D(4); Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 2(1), 2(2) and 2(3); Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 113; Finance Act, 1995; Constitution of India - Articles 269, 270 and 271

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(SC)274; [2008]297ITR322(SC); JT2008(1)SC208; 2008(1)SCALE99; (2008)4SCC362; 2008AIRSCW1066

respect of the search carried out on 17.1.2001; secondly, whether the proviso inserted in Section 113 by the Finance Act, 2002 is clarificatory?Whether Finance Act, 2001 was applicable to block assessment under Chapter XIV-B up to 1.06.2002:5. Chapter XIV-B … the block assessment, the A.O. determined the assessee's undisclosed income at Rs. 1,62,427/-. He computed tax thereon at 60% in terms of Section 113 of the 1961 Act amounting to Rs. 97,456/- on which surcharge was levied

Commr. of Income Tax Vs. Gujarat Maritime Board

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Gujarat Maritime Board Act, 1981 - Sections 3(2), 25, 26, 73, 74 and 75; General Clause Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(15), 10(20), 11, 11(1), 11(4), 11(16), 12A and 60 to 63; Finance Act, 2002; Gujarat Maritime Board Act, 1981; Indian Ports Act, 1903 - Sections 36; Banking Companies Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking Act, 1970 - Sections 2; Public Trust Act

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(SC)81; [2007]295ITR561(SC); 2007(14)SCALE21; 2007AIRSCW7912; 2008(3)KCCRSN199

income of the Board was not eligible to income-tax under Section 10(20) or the Income-tax Act, 1961.3. By finance Act, 2002, an Explanation was added in Section 10(20) by which 'Local Authority' was defined. It gave a restricted meaning … relief, and the advancement of any other object of general public utility.11.(1) Subject to the provisions of Sections 60 to 63, the following income shall not be included in the total income of the previous year of

Merit Enterprises Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)288ITR226(Hyd.)

short issue in this appeal is whether the levy of surcharge in terms of the provisions of the Finance Act, 2002, is valid in a block assessment made under Section 158BC of the Income-tax Act. The tax has to … levy of surcharge of Rs. 3,65,680 on the tax of Rs. 86,56,800 levied at the special rate of 60%.2. At the outset, it would be appropriate to refer to the reasons furnished by the Division Bench, which

Virtual Soft Systems Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-i

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28(1), 48, 143, 143(1), 143(1A), 260A, 271 and 271(1); Finance Act, 1975; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 271; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975; Finance Act, 1993; Finance Act, 1992; Finance Act, 1951; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 23(5), 28 and 28(1); Constitution of India - Article 20(1)

Reported in : (2007)207CTR(SC)733; [2007]289ITR83(SC); JT2007(3)SC125; 2007(2)SCALE612; (2007)9SCC665

Elphinstone Spinning and Weaving Mills Company Ltd. : [1960]40ITR142(SC) . 11. Section 271(1)(c) was again amended by the Finance Act, 2002. Subsequent amendment was brought to the notice of the Bench hearing the Appeal. In the impugned order, the

Windson Electronics Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 2002; ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 132, 132(1), 132(3) and 132(8A)

Reported in : (2004)191CTR(Cal)542,[2004]269ITR481(Cal)

Mr. Chatterjee says that this Sub-section (8A) has been inserted with effect from June 1, 2002, by the Finance Act, 2002. Prior thereto there was a provision for extension beyond the period of 60 days subject to strict regulatory

Dharmodayam Company Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Kerala Chitties Act, 1975 - Sections 2(4), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 4(1), 5, 6, 6(3), 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 34, 35, 39, 40, 42, 43, 55, 56, 59, 60, 67, 72, 89 and 220; Kerala Finance Act, 2002; Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 1(3), 2, 4(1), 7(3), 8, 9(1), 20 and 90; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 226, 245 to 255; Companies Act; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 3(5) and 4; Kerala Chittis (Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : AIR2005Ker253; [2005]126CompCas586(Ker); 2005(3)KLT332

constitutional validity of Sub-section 1(a) to Section 4 of the Kerala Chitties Act, 1975 introduced by the Kerala Finance Act, 2002 (Act 7 of 2002) with effect from 1.4.2002 as beyond the legislative competence of the State Legislature and … 55 deal with winding up of chitties. Section 56 to 59 deal with registration of office and fees. Section 60 to 72 are miscellaneous provisions. Kerala Chitties Act was enacted to define, amend and consolidate the law relating

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Ramesh Chand Soni

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)81TTJ(Jodh.)253

by the learned AO is well within time. In the alternative, the learned counsel has submitted that the Finance Act, 2002, which came into effect from 1st June, 2002, has extended further period of 60 days in the circumstances … facts leading to this appeal as well as cross-appeal are that on 15th July, 1998, a search under Section 132(1) of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') was carried out at the residential

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Parmanand M. Patel

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 - Sections 56; ;Marriage Act 1955 - Sections 15(2); ;Finance Act, 2002; ;Income Tax Act, 1922; ;Constitution of India - Article 141; ;Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 22A; ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(43), 139(1), 139(2), 142(2A), 143(3), 148, 256(1), 263, 271, 271(1), 271A, 271B, 272A(2), 274 and 275; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 3, 3(1), 7, 12, 12(3), 12(4), 12B (4), 13, 18, 18A, 22A and 28

Reported in : (2005)198CTR(Guj)641; [2005]278ITR3(Guj)

the Act, etc. 6.3 Inviting attention to the amendment made to Section 271(1) of the Act by the Finance Act, 2002 it was submitted that the said provision as it originally stood granted powers only to the Assessing Officer … as this the evidence must enable the judge to feel what Dixon J [in Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336] defined as San actual persuasion. That means a mind not troubled by doubt or, to adapt

Mange Ram Mittal Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

assessing officer and relatable to such evidence appearing in Section 158BB(1) of the Act as substituted by the Finance Act, 2002 with retrospective effect from 1-7-1995." 2. In this appeal the assessee originally filed grounds of appeal running into … made on page 1 of Documents D-10. The entries on that page showed that 8 trucks comprising of 600 cases of country liquor each were purchased at the rate of Rs. 51,000 per truck for Hansi and

Mange Ram Mittal Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)103ITD389(Delhi)

the AO and relatable to such evidence' appearing in Section 158BB(1) of the Act as substituted by the Finance Act, 2002 with retrospective effect from 1st July, 1995.2. In this appeal the assessee originally filed grounds of appeal running … made on p. 1 of documents D-10. The entries on that page showed that 8 trucks comprising of 600 cases of country liquor each were purchased at the rate of Rs. 51,000 per truck for Hansi and