Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Income Central Ii Vs. Suresh N. Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 4, 4(1), 32, 32(2), 68, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C, 112, 113, 115A, 115AB, 115AC, 115ACA, 115AD, 115B, 115BB, 115BBA, 115E, 115JB, 132, 132A, 132B, 139, 139(1), 142, 142(1), 143, 143(1B), 143(2), 143(3), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 158BA, 158BA(1), 158BA(2), 158BB, 158BB(1), 158BC, 158BH, 161, 161(1A), 164, 164A, 167B, 245D and 245D(4); Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 2(1), 2(2) and 2(3); Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 113; Finance Act, 1995; Constitution of India - Articles 269, 270 and 271

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(SC)274; [2008]297ITR322(SC); JT2008(1)SC208; 2008(1)SCALE99; (2008)4SCC362; 2008AIRSCW1066

respect of the search carried out on 17.1.2001; secondly, whether the proviso inserted in Section 113 by the Finance Act, 2002 is clarificatory?Whether Finance Act, 2001 was applicable to block assessment under Chapter XIV-B up to 1.06.2002:5. Chapter XIV-B … carried out at the premises of the respondent-assessee, an individual. The search unearthed an unexplained investment of Rs. 65,000/- being the value of household valuables and Rs. 97,427/- on account of unexplained marriage expenses (undisclosed income). Accordingly,

Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. THE UNION OF ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

impregnated seed is a service, and this is liable to be taxed under the relevant provisions of the Finance Act as amended, read with the Rules that pertain to service tax. This is a central levy. The transaction … with whom it deals is not, and cannot be, a sale assessable under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 ( the MVAT Act ). Mr. Venkatraman insists that the transaction in question involves no transfer of a … of India, challenges Item (12) under the Notification No. VAT-1505/CR-114/Taxation-1 dated 1st June 2005 as being ultra vires Section 6 of the MVAT Act and Article 246 of the Constitution. 55. A brief description of Subway s business

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Aditya Chemicals Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(a),2(24), 2(45), 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 6, 14, 22(1), 22(4), 23(1), 23(2), 34(2), 64, 72, 80, 139, 39(1), 139(2), 139(3), 148, 153(1), 260A, 271, 271(2) and 271A ; Finance Act, 2002; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2 and 28(1); Finance Act, 1988; Finance Act, 1951 - Sections 2(7)

Reported in : (2005)197CTR(Del)241; [2006]283ITR458(Delhi)

23(1), 23(2), 34(2), 64, 72, 80, 139, 39(1), 139(2), 139(3), 148, 153(1), 260A, 271, 271(2) and 271A ; Finance Act, 2002; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2 and 28(1); Finance Act, 1988; Finance Act, 1951 - Section 2(7)Cases … year of every assessed. Section 4 of the 1922 Act defined the ambit of that total income and Section 6 thereof enumerated six heads of income, profits and gains chargeable to income-tax being (i) Salaries; (ii) Interest on

Merit Enterprises Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)288ITR226(Hyd.)

short issue in this appeal is whether the levy of surcharge in terms of the provisions of the Finance Act, 2002, is valid in a block assessment made under Section 158BC of the Income-tax Act. The tax has to … where intended, there can be no justification to read retrospectivity into the amendment made by Clause (a) of Section 6 of the amending Act which does not contain any word to that effect.12.30 Further, in the case of

Dharmodayam Company Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Kerala Chitties Act, 1975 - Sections 2(4), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 4(1), 5, 6, 6(3), 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 34, 35, 39, 40, 42, 43, 55, 56, 59, 60, 67, 72, 89 and 220; Kerala Finance Act, 2002; Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 1(3), 2, 4(1), 7(3), 8, 9(1), 20 and 90; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 226, 245 to 255; Companies Act; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 3(5) and 4; Kerala Chittis (Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : AIR2005Ker253; [2005]126CompCas586(Ker); 2005(3)KLT332

constitutional validity of Sub-section 1(a) to Section 4 of the Kerala Chitties Act, 1975 introduced by the Kerala Finance Act, 2002 (Act 7 of 2002) with effect from 1.4.2002 as beyond the legislative competence of the State Legislature and … such Banking Company shall be entitled to conduct at a time chitties the aggregate amount of which exceeds 60% of the net assets of the Foreman. Section 4 of the Chitties Act states that where previous sanction

K.R. Palanisamy and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24), 10, 44BBB, 44AC, 44AD, 45, 48, 50(2), 50C, 50C(2), 50C(3), 52(2), 53, 54, 54B, 54E, 54EA, 54EB, 54F, 54G, 54H and 206C; Finance Act, 2002; Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 47A, 47A(1), 47A(5), 47A(10) and 75; Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 16A(1), 16A(2), 16A(3), 16A(4), 16A(5), 16A(6), 23A, 23A(1), 23A(6), 23A(7), 24(5), 34AA, 35 and 37; Registration Act, 1908; Stamp (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 1967; Rajasthan Sales-tax Act - Sections 4A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 246 and 265; Tamil Nadu Stamp (Prevention of Undervaluation of Instruments) Rules, 1968 - Rules 4 and 5

Reported in : (2008)219CTR(Mad)323; [2008]306ITR61(Mad); [2009]180TAXMAN253(Mad)

J.1. In all these cases, the constitutional validity of Section 50C of the IT Act, 1961 introduced by Finance Act, 2002 with effect from the asst. yr. 2003-04 is questioned.2. The grounds of attack and argument made for and

The Southern India Cotton Waste Merchants and Exporters Association an ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 6, 8, 8(1), 8(2), 8(4) and 8(5); Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 152

Reported in : (2009)24VST605(Mad)

made in the course of inter-State trade or commerce, These words are added by Section 152(v) of the Finance Act (20 of 2002. (to a registered dealer or the Government) by any dealer having his place of business … the CSTA prescribes the rate of tax on sales in the course of inter-State trade or commerce, while Section 6 is a charging provision.13. Thereafter, in paragraphs 39 and 40, the conclusions arrived at by the Division Bench

Mahim Patram Private Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales TaxConstitution

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 3, 3AAA, 3D, 4, 4A, 5, 6, 6(1), 6(2), 8, 8A, 9, 9(2), 9(3), 13, 13(1), 13(3), 14 and 15; Finance Act, 2002; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3F and 3F(2); Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Rules, 1948 - Rule 44B and 44C; Constitution (Forty-sixth Amendment) Act; Finance Act, 2005 - Sections 89; Motor Vehicles Act; Wealth Tax Act - Sections 7(1); State Sales Tax Act; Tenancy Act; Central Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1962 - Sections 8; Central Sales Tax (U.P.) Rules, 1957 - Rule 9; Constitution of India - Articles 286, 286(3) and 366

Reported in : JT2007(4)SC50; 2007(3)SCALE584; (2007)3SCC668; 2007[7]STR110; [2007]7STT136

deference to the aforementioned judgment of this Court, the Parliament amended Section 2(g) of the 1956 Act by Finance Act, 2002. No rule, however, has till date been framed in regard to the manner in which sales price of … any definition of works contract, this Court held:38. Since the question of levy of inter-State sales tax under Section 6 of the Central Sales Tax Act is not in issue in these cases which only relate to imposition

Director of Income Tax Vs M/S Bagri Foundation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Income Tax

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80G(5)(vi), 12AA ; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 11(1)(a),11(2)(a)

inter alia raised a question as to whether the "Explanation" appended under Section 11(2) and inserted by the Finance Act, 2002 w.e.f. 1st April, 2003, applies to accumulations mentioned in Section 11(1)(a) of the Act. The following question was … under:-"11. Income from property held for charitable or religious purposes - (1) Subject to the provisions of sections, 60 to 63, the following income shall not be included in the total income of the previous year of

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi Vs. Woodward Governor India P. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28, 29, 30 to 43D, 48, 50, 56, 143, 143(1), 143(2), 144, 145, 145(1), 145(2) and 145(3); Finance Act, 2002; Companies Act - Sections 209; Finance Act, 1967

Reported in : (2009)223CTR(SC)1; [2009]312ITR254(SC); JT2009(5)SC378; 2009(5)SCALE198; (2009)13SCC1; [2009]179TAXMAN326(SC); 2009(3)LC1519(SC); [2009] 5 SCR 738

Counsel next contended that on a proper and true interpretation of the amendment to Section 43A, introduced by Finance Act, 2002, Section 43A is clarificatory. According to the learned Counsel, the occasion for the clarificatory amendment arose in view of … only, and not of business losses which are, however, deductible on ordinary principles of commercial accounting. (see page 617 of the eighth edition). It is this principle which attracts the provisions of Section 145. That section recognizes