Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi Vs. Woodward Governor India P. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28, 29, 30 to 43D, 48, 50, 56, 143, 143(1), 143(2), 144, 145, 145(1), 145(2) and 145(3); Finance Act, 2002; Companies Act - Sections 209; Finance Act, 1967

Reported in : (2009)223CTR(SC)1; [2009]312ITR254(SC); JT2009(5)SC378; 2009(5)SCALE198; (2009)13SCC1; [2009]179TAXMAN326(SC); 2009(3)LC1519(SC); [2009] 5 SCR 738

Counsel next contended that on a proper and true interpretation of the amendment to Section 43A, introduced by Finance Act, 2002, Section 43A is clarificatory. According to the learned Counsel, the occasion for the clarificatory amendment arose in view of … Section 36, or, in the case of a capital asset (not being a capital asset referred to in Section 50), the cost of acquisition thereof for the purposes of Section 48, and the amount arrived at after such

K.R. Palanisamy and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24), 10, 44BBB, 44AC, 44AD, 45, 48, 50(2), 50C, 50C(2), 50C(3), 52(2), 53, 54, 54B, 54E, 54EA, 54EB, 54F, 54G, 54H and 206C; Finance Act, 2002; Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 47A, 47A(1), 47A(5), 47A(10) and 75; Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 16A(1), 16A(2), 16A(3), 16A(4), 16A(5), 16A(6), 23A, 23A(1), 23A(6), 23A(7), 24(5), 34AA, 35 and 37; Registration Act, 1908; Stamp (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 1967; Rajasthan Sales-tax Act - Sections 4A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 246 and 265; Tamil Nadu Stamp (Prevention of Undervaluation of Instruments) Rules, 1968 - Rules 4 and 5

Reported in : (2008)219CTR(Mad)323; [2008]306ITR61(Mad); [2009]180TAXMAN253(Mad)

J.1. In all these cases, the constitutional validity of Section 50C of the IT Act, 1961 introduced by Finance Act, 2002 with effect from the asst. yr. 2003-04 is questioned.2. The grounds of attack and argument made for and … ORDERK. Raviraja Pandian, J.1. In all these cases, the constitutional validity of Section 50C of the IT Act, 1961 introduced by Finance Act, 2002 with effect from the asst. yr. 2003-04 is

Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajkot Vs. Gujarat Siddhi Cement Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32A, 33, 35(1), 35A, 36(1), 41(1), 43, 43A, 43A(1), 43A(2), 48, 50 and 260A; Finance Act, 2002; Finance Act, 1967 - Sections 43A; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 2

Reported in : (2008)220CTR(SC)217; [2008]307ITR393(SC); 2008(13)SCALE742

Section 33. It is to be noted that Section 43A in the present form was substituted by the Finance Act, 2002 w.e.f. 1.4.2003. Prior to its substitution Section 43A as inserted by the Finance Act, 1967 w.e.f. 1.4.67 and … Section 36, or, in the case of a capital asset (not being a capital asset referred to in Section 50), the cost of acquisition thereof for the purposes of Section 48, and the amount arrived at after such

Tata Sky Limited Vs. the State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; ; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 4; ; Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1979 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4A, 4A(4), 4B and 4C; ; Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax (Amendment) Act, 2009; ; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 65(5), 65(13), 65(63), 65(72) and 137; ; Prasar Bharti (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990 - Section 2; ; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 65, 66(5), 65(14), 65(15), 65(80) and 65(90); ; Finance Act, 2003 - Section 65, 65(16), 65(95), 65(105) and 66(1); ; Finance Act, 2004; ; Finance Act, 2005 - Section 65(16) and 65(105); ; Government of India Act, 1935; ; Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995; ; Bengal Amusements Tax Act, 1922; ; We

the gross amount charged by the service provider).19(ii). The term 'broadcasting' was re-defined under Section 65(14) of the Finance Act, 2002 as under:65. Definitions.- In this Chapter, unless the context otherwise requires,-(14). 'broadcasting' has the meaning assigned to it … be paid before the 7th day of the month.(b) The FRANCHISEE will keep an interest-free deposit of Rs. 50/- per subscriber with the NETWORK.(c) The price mentioned in (a) above is liable to change depending upon the

Assst. C.i.T., Vadodara Vs. Elecon Engineering Co. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32, 36(1), 37, 43, 43(1), 43A and 50; Finance Act, 1967; Finance Act, 2002; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 2

Reported in : (2010)230CTR(SC)1

finance the purchase of plant and machinery.9. Section 43A, before its substitution by a new Section 43A vide Finance Act, 2002, was inserted by Finance Act, 1967 with effect from 1.4.1967, after the devaluation of the rupee on 6 … Section 36, or, in the case of a capital asset (not being a capital asset referred to in Section 50), the cost of acquisition thereof for the purposes of Section 48, and the amount arrived at after such

Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications India Pvt. Ltd Vs. Commissioner of ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

assessment year, proceedings for which have been completed before the 1st day of July, 2012. *Inserted by the Finance Act, 2002, w.e.f. 1-6-2002. *** Inserted by the Finance Act 2011, w.e.f. 1-6-2011. # Substituted by the Finance Act 2012, … 92B. The section also had retrospective amendment which was inserted by the Finance Act, 2012 w.r.e.f. 1st April, 2002. Section 92B(1) reads as under: ―Meaning of international transaction. 92B - (1) For the purposes of this section and … subsidiary of a Sweden based entity, ‗Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB‘, a 50:50 joint venture of Sony Corporation (Japan) and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Sweden). The

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … for the credit of the duty paid. This was a case falling under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act 2002. The challenge in this case was to the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra Value Added … Mehra Brothers Vs. Joint Commercial Officer, Madras, (1991)1 Supreme Court Cases 514) 50. Banco Products (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex., Vadodara-I, (2009(235) ELT

Cargo Clearing Agency (Gujarat) Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(7A), 3, 4, 4(1), 32(2), 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C, 113, 132, 132A, 132B, 132(5), 132(7), 139, 139(1), 139(5), 142, 142(1), 143, 143(1A), 143(1B), 143(2), 143(3), 144, 145, 147 to 153, 153(2), 158B, 158BA, 158BA(1), 158BA(2), 158BB, 158BB(1), 158BB(2), 158BC, 158BD, 158BE, 158BG, 158BH and 245D; Finance Act, 1995; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1996; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998; Finance Act, 2001; Finance Act, 2002

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(Guj)541; [2008]307ITR1(Guj)

initiated or requisitions made on or after that date.12.4. The last amendment came to be made by the Finance Act, 2002 which has been explained in Circular No. 8/2002 dated 27.08.2002. The relevant extract of the said Circular reads … extract reads as under:Rationalisation of special procedure for assessment of search cases.- 50.1 The Finance Act, 1995 introduced a new scheme of assessment of undisclosed … Association of Persons (AOP) declaring income of Rs. 5,05,087/- came to be filed.3. On 24.11.1995 search proceedings Under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) were carried out at the residential premises of three

Commr.of Income Tax-i,new Delhi Vs. Vatika Township P.Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') which was inserted in that Section by the Finance Act, 2002 is to operate prospectively or is clarificatory and curative in nature and, therefore, has retrospective operation. The Background … 'fairness’, which must be the basis of every legal rule as was observed in the decision reported in L’Office Cherifien des Phosphates v. Yamashita-Shinnihon Steamship Co.Ltd[4].. Thus, legislations which modified accrued rights or which impose obligations or

Commissioner of Income Tax vs.m. S. Aggarwal

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

the AO and relatable to such evidence.‖ The expression ―relatable to such evidence‖ has been inserted by the Finance Act, 2002 retrospectively w.e.f. 1.7.1995. A bare reading of this provision would indicate that undisclosed income has to be computed … MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ITA No.169/2005+connected appeal Page 1 of 77 SANJIV KHANNA, J.: Afore-stated appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‗Act‘ for short) have been preferred by the Revenue, the Commissioner … Mr. Kamlapati Singhania had given him and his HUF gifts of Rs. 50,00,000/- and Rs.10,00,000/-, respectively. This was the only gift ITA No.169/2005+connected appeal Page