Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2002 section 39 · Page 1 of about 2,574 results (0.077 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 29 2005

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Aditya Chemicals Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-29-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(a),2(24), 2(45), 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 6, 14, 22(1), 22(4), 23(1), 23(2), 34(2), 64, 72, 80, 139, 39(1), 139(2), 139(3), 148, 153(1), 260A, 271, 271(2) and 271A ; Finance Act, 2002; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2 and 28(1); Finance Act, 1988; Finance Act, 1951 - Sections 2(7)

Reported in : (2005)197CTR(Del)241; [2006]283ITR458(Delhi)

23(1), 23(2), 34(2), 64, 72, 80, 139, 39(1), 139(2), 139(3), 148, 153(1), 260A, 271, 271(2) and 271A ; Finance Act, 2002; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2 and 28(1); Finance Act, 1988; Finance Act, 1951 - Section 2(7)Cases

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2015

Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications India Pvt. Ltd Vs. Commissioner of ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-16-2015

Subject : MRTP

assessment year, proceedings for which have been completed before the 1st day of July, 2012. *Inserted by the Finance Act, 2002, w.e.f. 1-6-2002. *** Inserted by the Finance Act 2011, w.e.f. 1-6-2011. # Substituted by the Finance Act 2012, … 92B. The section also had retrospective amendment which was inserted by the Finance Act, 2012 w.r.e.f. 1st April, 2002. Section 92B(1) reads as under: ―Meaning of international transaction. 92B - (1) For the purposes of this section and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 13 2023

K.l. Swamy Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-13-2023

Subject : Direct Taxation

the words “that Assessing Officer shall proceed” the words “under Section 158BC” was inserted w.e.f. 01.06.2002 by the Finance Act, 2002. It was contended that the amendment was specifically brought to cure the anomaly and the fact that it … in nature.38. There are various reasons for coming to this conclusion which we enumerate hereinbelow. Reasons in support 39. The first and foremost poser is as to whether it was possible to make the block assessment with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 26 2014

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-2014

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … for the credit of the duty paid. This was a case falling under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act 2002. The challenge in this case was to the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra Value Added

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 2005

Dharmodayam Company Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-31-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Kerala Chitties Act, 1975 - Sections 2(4), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 4(1), 5, 6, 6(3), 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 34, 35, 39, 40, 42, 43, 55, 56, 59, 60, 67, 72, 89 and 220; Kerala Finance Act, 2002; Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 1(3), 2, 4(1), 7(3), 8, 9(1), 20 and 90; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 226, 245 to 255; Companies Act; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 3(5) and 4; Kerala Chittis (Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : AIR2005Ker253; [2005]126CompCas586(Ker); 2005(3)KLT332

constitutional validity of Sub-section 1(a) to Section 4 of the Kerala Chitties Act, 1975 introduced by the Kerala Finance Act, 2002 (Act 7 of 2002) with effect from 1.4.2002 as beyond the legislative competence of the State Legislature and … rights by Foreman etc. Section 34 deals with meetings of the general body of subscribers. Section 35 to 39 deal with termination of chitties. Section 40 to 42 deal with inspection of documents by subscribers and Registrar.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2003

Mrs. Aruna M. Katara Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Decided on : Aug-04-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)82TTJ(Pune.)363

para 39(3)(f) of the said circular). Further it is noted that amendment to Section 113 brought in by Finance Act, 2002, is classificatory in nature since there were some problem in adopting the rate of surcharge as applicable when

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2004

Maharashtra State Electricity Board Vs. Maharashtra Electricity Regula ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-11-2004

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 17(5), 27 and 29; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 45, 49 and 59

Reported in : AIR2004Bom294; 2004(3)BomCR485

J.1. By these appeals, the appellants challenge the order dated 10th January, 2002 passed by the Maharashtra Electricity Regulation Commission (for short 'the Commission') passed … which may be allowed by the State Government in accordance with Sections 39 and 63 of the Electricity Supply Act, 1948 and subsidies, if any, … and the tariffs should have been so approved that there would be no recovered revenue gap in the finances of the Board. In our opinion, there can be no doubt that the affairs of Electricity Board are … the Maharashtra Electricity Regulation Commission (for short 'the Commission') passed under Section 29 of the Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 (for short 'ERC Act') determining and fixing the tariff for electrical power at rates lower than the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 2021

Engineering Analysis Centre Of Excellence Private Limited Vs. The Comm ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-02-2021

Subject : Direct Taxation

the Act, it shall 21 Inserted by the Finance Act 2017, sec. 39 (w.e.f. 1-4-2018). 33 have the same meaning as assigned to it in … he submitted that the retrospective amendment to section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act brought in by the Finance Act 2012, which added explanation 4 to the provision and expanded its ambit with effect from 01.06.1976, could also … from the United States of America [“USA”].. The assessment years that we are concerned with are 2001-2002 and 2002-2003.6. The Assessing Officer by an order dated 15.05.2002, after applying Article 12(3) of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 2008

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Amit Kumar Maheshwari

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-08-2008

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : 2009[13]STR119; (2009)22VST397(Raj)

on different types of business, did not get registration as required by the relevant chapter, introduced by the Finance Act, 1994, relating to imposition of Service Tax, hereafter referred to as the 'Service Tax Act', and notices were … 2% of Service Tax payable is also to be paid.(c) Interest is payable @ 24% upto 11th May 2002, 15% for period between 11th May 2002 and 10th September 2004 and 18% for period after 10th September … Designated Authority:Sir,I hereby make the declaration for being registered in terms of Section 69 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994).1. Name: ___________________________________2. Address

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2014

M/S. Kone Elevator India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of T.N. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-06-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

reference to the definition ‘Commissioning and Installation Agency’ and ‘Taxable Service’ under Section 65(29) and (105)(zzd) of the Finance Act, 1994 as was brought out w.e.f. 14.05.2003 and subsequently w.e.f. 10.09.2004 and 16.06.2005. In fact, the learned Senior … W.P No.548 of 2008, the challenge is to the revised pre-assessment notices dated 23.06.2006 for the assessment period 2002- 2003 and 03.04.2008 for the Assessment Year 2001-2002, issued by the Third Respondent and the Second Respondent respectively. … 23/2010, 62/2010, 232/2010, 279/2010, 377/2010, 112/2011, 137/2011, 181/2011, 207/2011, 278/2011, 243/2011, 372/2011, 398/2011, 381/2011, 468/2011, 547/2011, 107/2012, 125/2012, 196/2012, 263/2012, 404/2012, 567/2012, 145/2013, 241/2013, 454/2013,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial