Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Aditya Chemicals Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(a),2(24), 2(45), 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 6, 14, 22(1), 22(4), 23(1), 23(2), 34(2), 64, 72, 80, 139, 39(1), 139(2), 139(3), 148, 153(1), 260A, 271, 271(2) and 271A ; Finance Act, 2002; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2 and 28(1); Finance Act, 1988; Finance Act, 1951 - Sections 2(7)

Reported in : (2005)197CTR(Del)241; [2006]283ITR458(Delhi)

23(1), 23(2), 34(2), 64, 72, 80, 139, 39(1), 139(2), 139(3), 148, 153(1), 260A, 271, 271(2) and 271A ; Finance Act, 2002; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2 and 28(1); Finance Act, 1988; Finance Act, 1951 - Section 2(7)Cases

Plastiblends India Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Ac ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 29 to 43A, 72, 80A, 80AA, 80AB, 80B(5), 80E, 80HH, 80HH(6), 80HH(7), 80I, 80IA, 80IA(5), 80IA(8), 80IA(10), 80IB, 80IB(13), 143(1), 143(3), 147 and 260A; Companies Act, 1956; Taxation Laws (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1986 - Sections 34(1); Finance (No. 2) Act, 1980; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 5

Reported in : (2009)223CTR(Bom)291; [2009]178TAXMAN397(Bom)

the Act which continued till the assessment year 2002-2003, when explanation to Section 5 was inserted by the Finance Act 2001 with effect from 1.4.2002 and, therefore, the Tribunal erred in holding that omission of Section 34(1) by

Vedansh Hospitality and Resorts Limited Vs. New India Co-operative Ban ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

passed against him. iv) Booz Allen and Hamilton INC. Vs. SBI Home Finance Limited and Ors. (2011) 5 SCC 532). A lis for sale, foreclosure … Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the Arbitration Act) and Section 84 of the Multi-States Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 (for short, MSCS Act). 3 The operative part of the impugned award is as under:- “AWARD 1) I, … 4 and 5) have challenged award dated 13 July 2011 passed by the sole Arbitrator (Respondent No.4), under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the Arbitration Act) and Section 84 of the Multi-States

Amrit Jal Ventures Private Limited Vs. Srei Infrastructure Finance Lim ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

1993, 1993 and Section 34 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, (hereinafter referred to as the “SARFAESI Act”) such arbitration clause is invalid and unenforceable. It is submitted that … ORIGINAL SIDE BEFORE:THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN A.P.No.6 of 2016 AMRIT JAL VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED versus SREI INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE LIMITED For the petitioner : Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Sr.Adv.Mr.Jishnu Chowdhury, Adv.Mr.Abhijit Sarkar, Adv.Mr.Aritra Basu, Adv.Ms.A.Chatterjee, Adv.Mr.Ratul Das, Adv.Mr.Abhik Chitta

Dharmodayam Company Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Kerala Chitties Act, 1975 - Sections 2(4), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 4(1), 5, 6, 6(3), 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 29, 34, 35, 39, 40, 42, 43, 55, 56, 59, 60, 67, 72, 89 and 220; Kerala Finance Act, 2002; Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 1(3), 2, 4(1), 7(3), 8, 9(1), 20 and 90; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 226, 245 to 255; Companies Act; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 3(5) and 4; Kerala Chittis (Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : AIR2005Ker253; [2005]126CompCas586(Ker); 2005(3)KLT332

constitutional validity of Sub-section 1(a) to Section 4 of the Kerala Chitties Act, 1975 introduced by the Kerala Finance Act, 2002 (Act 7 of 2002) with effect from 1.4.2002 as beyond the legislative competence of the State Legislature and … providing security etc. by prized subscribers. Section 30 to 33 deal with transfer of rights by Foreman etc. Section 34 deals with meetings of the general body of subscribers. Section 35 to 39 deal with termination of chitties.

Standard Chartered Bank Through Its Authorised Officer Vs. Virendra Ra ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : Education

to make decisions or interfere with the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (in short SARFAESI Act). Here lies the rub in Section 34 of SARFAESI Act which reads as follows:- … passed by Honble State Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, U.P. in appeal No.694/09 titled œGaya Prasad Vs. GIC Housing Finance Limited? and order dated 01.05.09 has been relied upon, we have gone through the said order from which

K.Venkatesan vs R.K.Ganesan and 7 Others

Court : Chennai

the eighth respondent.6. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that as perSection 34 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, the Civil suit is barred by law. Once the secured assets have been sold in accordance with SARFAESI … Chodiya No.273, I Floor, Symdanhamas Road Chennai 600 112.6. TATA Capital Housing Finance Limited One Forbes, Dr.V.B.Gandhi Marg Fort Mumbai 400 001. Also at Centennial … on 5/3/2024 is still beyond time by 29 days. 3.2. It is further averred in the affidavit that Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, expressly bars the jurisdiction of Civil Courts “in respect of any matter” which the DRT/DRAT

Firm L. Hazari Mal Kuthiala Vs. Income-tax Officer, Special Circle, Am ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Direct TaxationConstitution

Acts : Finance Act, 1950 - Sections 13(1); Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 1, 23 and 34; Stamp Act, 1899; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Constitution of India - Article 265; Patiala State Income-tax Act, 2001 - Sections 5(5) and 34; Pepsu Administration Ordinance; Kapurthala Income-tax Act - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR1957P& H5; [1956]30ITR500(P& H)

The first point for consideration in the present case is, whether the expression 'assessment' appearing in Section 13, Finance Act, 1950, in pursuance of which this notice was issued, is wide enough to cover a re-assessment under Section … No. 16 of 2005 could operate as a release from that liability, for Section 6, Patiala General Clauses Act, 2002, declares that where any Patiala Act made after the commencement of this Act repeals any enactment hereto made … it was within the competence of the Income-tax Officer, Special Circle, Ambala Cantonment, to issue a notice under Section 34, Income-tax Act requiring the petitioner to file a return of his total income for the year 1946.2. The

Glaxo Smith Kline Asia P. Ltd. Vs.assess. Auth. Special Zone Trade

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

41 with the introduction of the taxable category of „franchise service‟, in the service tax laws, viz. the Finance Act, 1994, the Appellant obtained service tax registration with effect from 01.07.2003 and since then has been regularly filing … to use the goods, i.e., the trade mark, under the Delhi Sales Tax on Right to Use Goods Act, 2002 and under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004?.2. The appellant is a wholly owned subsidiary of McDonald‟s … to show cause why it should not be assessed to tax under Section 23 (6) of the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975, read with Section … Advocates. Versus ASSESS. AUTH. SPECIAL ZONE TRADE …..Respondent ST.APPL.& 27/2013; W.P.(C) 10726/06, 3408/13, 44& 34Page 1 of 41 Through: Sh. Deepak Anand, Jr. Standing Counsel,

Mc Donalds India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.commissioner of T&t

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

41 with the introduction of the taxable category of „franchise service‟, in the service tax laws, viz. the Finance Act, 1994, the Appellant obtained service tax registration with effect from 01.07.2003 and since then has been regularly filing … to use the goods, i.e., the trade mark, under the Delhi Sales Tax on Right to Use Goods Act, 2002 and under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004?.2. The appellant is a wholly owned subsidiary of McDonald‟s … to show cause why it should not be assessed to tax under Section 23 (6) of the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975, read with Section … Advocates. Versus ASSESS. AUTH. SPECIAL ZONE TRADE …..Respondent ST.APPL.& 27/2013; W.P.(C) 10726/06, 3408/13, 44& 34Page 1 of 41 Through: Sh. Deepak Anand, Jr. Standing Counsel,