Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2002 section 31 · Page 1 of about 5,555 results (0.098 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 15 2003

Unique Engineering Works Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Dec-15-2003

Subject : BankingSICA

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Debt Recovery Tribunal Act, 1993; ;Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provision) Act, 1985 - Sections 15 and 22; Impunged Act, 2002; Non-performing Asset Act, 2002 - Sections 2, 2(1), 5, 9, 12, 13(2), 13(4), 13(5), 13(8), 13(13), 17(2), 19 and 31; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 172; Debt Recovery Tribunal (Amendment) Act, 2003; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 60

Reported in : II(2004)BC241

secured creditor including mortgage, charge, hypothecation, assignment other than those specified in Section 31 of the impugned NPA Act, 2002, Section 31 of the impugned NPA Act, 2002, therefore, excludes a lien on goods, a pledge of movables under Section … Asset (NPA) Act, 2002]Background facts :2. Extraordinary and urgent situations demand extraordinary remedial measures particularly in economics and finance. With globalization, India has become a signatory to various International Conventions, which require India to reduce its gross

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2008

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Narela, Delhi Vs. Commissioner ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-21-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 10, 10(20), 10(26AAB) and 260A; Finance Act, 2002; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1998 - Sections 5, 22(1), 22(2), 62 65, 88, 88(1), 88(2) and 88(3); Delhi Development Act, 1957; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 32; Constitution of India (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India - Articles 243, 243P, 243 and 243ZF

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(SC)433; [2008]305ITR1(SC); JT2008(10)SC17; 2008(11)SCALE540; (2008)9SCC434; 2008AIRSCW6285; 2008(6)Supreme520; 2008(11)SCALE540

the 1961 Act prior to its amendment by Finance Act, 2002 w.e.f. 1.4.03.10. Prior to the amendment by Finance Act, 2002, Section 10(20) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 provided as under:CHAPTER IIIINCOME WHICH DO NOT FORM PART OF TOTAL INCOMEIncomes

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2008

Vodafone International Holdings B.V., a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-03-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(17), 2(23A), 2(31), 2(37), 2(47), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5(2), 9, 9(1), 23(1), 23(3), 24, 26, 64, 64(2), 173, 191, 192(1A), 194, 194C(1), 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3), 197, 199, 200, 201, 203A, 221, 221(1), 201(1A), 245S, 246A and 271C; Foreign Contribution Regulation Act; Indian Official Secrets Act; Constitution Act; Information Technology Act; Indian Passport Act; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18, 19 and 42; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; MRTP Act - Sections 33; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 201; Companies Act; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008 - Sections 191 and 201; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2002; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2003; Income Tax Rules - Rules 30 and 31A, 41E; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

which construed the provisions of Section 201 of the Act as they stood before the amendment of the Finance Act, 2002. Therefore, the same would not enable the Respondents to urge that after the 2002 amendments made in Section … India, the machinery of deduction and collection of tax as provided in Section 203A and Rules 30 and 31A would be unworkable. Provisions of law should be interpreted in a manner to make them workable. Mr. Chagla,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 02 2003

The Tinplate Company of India Ltd. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-02-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 152; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(51)BLJR1666; [2003(3)JCR317(Jhr)]; [2006]143STC560(Jharkh)

necessary action. Thereupon the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Jharkhand, Ranchi issued notice under Section 46(4) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 to the petitioner for hearing under Section 46(4) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 in his Court … other product. Lastly it has been contended that the petitioner had filed Contempt (Civil) Case No. 999 of 2002 before this Court for initiating contempt proceeding for non-compliance of judgment dated 10.5.2002 passed in CWJC No. 2857/2000 … sales tax paid on the purchase of raw materials from 5.4.1996 to 31.3.1998 in terms of the direction of earlier Division Bench dated 6th January,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 24 2005

Smt. Jyoti M. Bhandari Vs. Asstt Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Decided on : Oct-24-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)6SOT375(Ahd.)

relied upon by the assessees are prior to the amendment by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 and Finance Act, 2002 with retrospective effect from 1-7-1995. The Explanation which the assessees relied upon was inserted by Finance (No. 2) … These two appeals by two assessees are against the orders of assessing officer passed under section 158BD read with section 158BC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the block period 1-4-1985 to 31-3-1995

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2007

Manisha Construction Vs. the Asstt. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Decided on : Mar-30-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

proceedings as provided under the newly inserted Sub-clause (A) of Clause (c) of Section 158BB(1) inserted by the Finance Act, 2002 with retrospective effect from 1-7-1995.14. We have considered the rival contentions of both the parties and have carefully

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 2006

Merit Enterprises Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Apr-26-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)288ITR226(Hyd.)

short issue in this appeal is whether the levy of surcharge in terms of the provisions of the Finance Act, 2002, is valid in a block assessment made under Section 158BC of the Income-tax Act. The tax has to … be held that the surcharge would even be leviable in respect of search carried out on or before 31^st May, 2002, the amendment made in Section 113 of the Act would be rendered futile/irrelevant, and such a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 2007

Virtual Soft Systems Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-i

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-06-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28(1), 48, 143, 143(1), 143(1A), 260A, 271 and 271(1); Finance Act, 1975; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 271; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975; Finance Act, 1993; Finance Act, 1992; Finance Act, 1951; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 23(5), 28 and 28(1); Constitution of India - Article 20(1)

Reported in : (2007)207CTR(SC)733; [2007]289ITR83(SC); JT2007(3)SC125; 2007(2)SCALE612; (2007)9SCC665

Elphinstone Spinning and Weaving Mills Company Ltd. : [1960]40ITR142(SC) . 11. Section 271(1)(c) was again amended by the Finance Act, 2002. Subsequent amendment was brought to the notice of the Bench hearing the Appeal. In the impugned order, the … 11,02,225.00.6. By order dated nil September, 2002, the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax levied a penalty of Rs. 31,71,692.00. He distinguished the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Prithipal Singh's case (supra), which was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2014

Commr.of Income Tax-i,new Delhi Vs. Vatika Township P.Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-15-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

by the Finance Act, 2002 was applicable to search of the earlier period as well i.e. upto May 31, 2002, the Court pointed out that in view of its answer to the first question, second question did … the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') which was inserted in that Section by the Finance Act, 2002 is to operate prospectively or is clarificatory and curative in nature and, therefore, has retrospective operation. The Background

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2007

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Agricultural Produce and Market Committ ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-28-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 - Sections 29, 31, 36, 37 and 52A; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(15), 10(20), 11, 12, 12A, 12AA, 80G and 260A; Finance Act, 2002; Bombay Shops and Establishment Act, 1948 - Sections 2(4); Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 4(3); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 25; Finance Act, 1983

Reported in : (2007)210CTR(Bom)386; [2007]291ITR419(Bom)

local authorities were covered under Section 10(20) of the Act and their income was exempt. However, by the Finance Act, 2002, with effect from April 1, 2003, an Explanation has been added to Section 10(20) of the Act whereby … Government may, from time to time, notify in the Official Gazzette (hereinafter referred to as the 'notified produce').16. Section 31 of the 1963 Act empowers the assessees to levy and collect fees in the prescribed manner at such

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial