Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Zam Zam Tanners

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961- Sections 2(24), 17, 28, 41, 44, 45, 59, 80HHC, 139(1), 139(3), 143(1A), 143, 144, 147, 160(1), 256(2), 271, 271(1) and 280D; ;Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975; ;Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 271(1); ;Finance Act, 1993 - Sections 143(1A); ;Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : (2005)197CTR(All)221; [2005]279ITR197(All)

have been concealed or inaccurate particulars have been furnished.'Section 271(1)(c) of the Act has been further amended by Finance Act, 2002, by which Clause (iii) and Expln. 4 has been modified. After the amendment section reads as follows :'(iii)

K.R. Palanisamy and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24), 10, 44BBB, 44AC, 44AD, 45, 48, 50(2), 50C, 50C(2), 50C(3), 52(2), 53, 54, 54B, 54E, 54EA, 54EB, 54F, 54G, 54H and 206C; Finance Act, 2002; Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 47A, 47A(1), 47A(5), 47A(10) and 75; Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 16A(1), 16A(2), 16A(3), 16A(4), 16A(5), 16A(6), 23A, 23A(1), 23A(6), 23A(7), 24(5), 34AA, 35 and 37; Registration Act, 1908; Stamp (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 1967; Rajasthan Sales-tax Act - Sections 4A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 246 and 265; Tamil Nadu Stamp (Prevention of Undervaluation of Instruments) Rules, 1968 - Rules 4 and 5

Reported in : (2008)219CTR(Mad)323; [2008]306ITR61(Mad); [2009]180TAXMAN253(Mad)

J.1. In all these cases, the constitutional validity of Section 50C of the IT Act, 1961 introduced by Finance Act, 2002 with effect from the asst. yr. 2003-04 is questioned.2. The grounds of attack and argument made for and … Section 16A, Clause (i) of Sub-section (1) and Sub-sections (6) and (7) of Section 23A, Sub-section (5) of Section 24, Section 34AA, Section 35 and Section 37 of the WT Act, 1957 (27 of 1957), shall, with necessary

Commnr. of Income Tax-i, Ahmedabad Vs. Gold CoIn Health Food Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24), 5(1), 72, 271 and 271(1); Finance Act, 2002; Wealth Tax Act - Sections 18

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(SC)359; [2008]304ITR308(SC); JT2008(9)SC312; 2008(11)SCALE492; (2008)9SCC622; 2008(2)LC1144(SC); 2008AIRSCW5841; 2008(6)Supreme1; 2008(11)SCALE492.; [2008] 12 SCR 179

income is a loss. This question has to be considered in the background of the amendment made by Finance Act, 2002 (in short `Finance Act') w.e.f. 1.4.2003 in Explanation 4 to Section 271(1)(c)(iii) of the Act. In Virtual's case … calculated as if the concealed income were the total income.9. Reference to the Department Circular No. 204 dated 24.7.1976 reported in 1977 (110) ITR 21 (St.) has also substantial relevance. Same reads as follows:New Explanation 4 defines

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Aditya Chemicals Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(a),2(24), 2(45), 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 6, 14, 22(1), 22(4), 23(1), 23(2), 34(2), 64, 72, 80, 139, 39(1), 139(2), 139(3), 148, 153(1), 260A, 271, 271(2) and 271A ; Finance Act, 2002; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2 and 28(1); Finance Act, 1988; Finance Act, 1951 - Sections 2(7)

Reported in : (2005)197CTR(Del)241; [2006]283ITR458(Delhi)

23(1), 23(2), 34(2), 64, 72, 80, 139, 39(1), 139(2), 139(3), 148, 153(1), 260A, 271, 271(2) and 271A ; Finance Act, 2002; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2 and 28(1); Finance Act, 1988; Finance Act, 1951 - Section 2(7)Cases … (2001) 70 TTJ (Del) 953; CIT v. Prithipal Singh & Co., (1990) 183 ITR 69 (P&H;) : (2001) 249 ITR 670 (SC);P.R. Basavappa & Sons v. CIT, (2000) 243 ITR 776 (Kar); CIT v. India Sea Foods,

Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation Vs. C ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

such cases: para 260. It was not open to the Revenue to rely on section 320 of the Finance Act 2004 ("Section 320 FA 2004") or section 107 of the Finance Act 2007 ("Section 107 FA 2007") to … by the operation of section 32(1)(c) of the Limitation Act 1980. During 2002 the opinion of the Advocate General and the judgment of the Court … from six to three years, in addition eliminated the special advantage for claims in mistake previously introduced by section 24(5) of the Finance Act 1989, delaying the commencement of the limitation period for such claims until the claimants

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Nagesh Devidas Kulkarni

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24), 10, 10(10C), 15, 16, 17, 17(1), 17(3), 57, 80CCC, 88, 89, 89(1), 143(1), 143(3), 147, 148 and 260A; University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Institutes of Technology Act, 1961 - Sections 3; Finance Act, 2002; Finance Act, 1993; Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 21A, 21AA and 21B

Reported in : (2007)210CTR(Bom)471; [2007]291ITR407(Bom)

in relation to any other assessment year;11. Section 89(1) of the Act as it stood prior to the Finance Act, 2002, reads as follows:Section 89 Relief when salary, etc., is paid in arrears or in advance.--(1) Where, by reason

M.Shobana Vs. Assistant Director at the Directorate of Enforcement

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

adjourned. (iii)In the decision Indian Bank, represented by its Chief Manager, Chennai V. Government of India Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Chennai, 2012 (4) CTC225 in paragraph 43, it is held as follows: ".43. .... The … of the powers conferred upon him as per Section 50 (2) and (3) of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002, he required the presence of the Writ Petitioners at his office on the dates and time specified. 3.The … Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate, Government of India (W.P.No.2429 of 2009 decided on 24.11.2009) wherein in paragraphs 17 to 20, it is mentioned as follows: ".17.

Merit Enterprises Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)288ITR226(Hyd.)

short issue in this appeal is whether the levy of surcharge in terms of the provisions of the Finance Act, 2002, is valid in a block assessment made under Section 158BC of the Income-tax Act. The tax has to … view of the matter, we see no substance in submissions of the assessee, and accordingly, reject the same. 24. Accordingly, assessee's ground of appeal against levy of surcharge, on income tax computed under Section 113 is dismissed.

Vodafone International Holdings B.V., a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(17), 2(23A), 2(31), 2(37), 2(47), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5(2), 9, 9(1), 23(1), 23(3), 24, 26, 64, 64(2), 173, 191, 192(1A), 194, 194C(1), 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3), 197, 199, 200, 201, 203A, 221, 221(1), 201(1A), 245S, 246A and 271C; Foreign Contribution Regulation Act; Indian Official Secrets Act; Constitution Act; Information Technology Act; Indian Passport Act; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18, 19 and 42; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; MRTP Act - Sections 33; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 201; Companies Act; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008 - Sections 191 and 201; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2002; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2003; Income Tax Rules - Rules 30 and 31A, 41E; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

which construed the provisions of Section 201 of the Act as they stood before the amendment of the Finance Act, 2002. Therefore, the same would not enable the Respondents to urge that after the 2002 amendments made in Section … a case to be stated upon a question of law for the opinion of the High Court under Section 24 of the Act. The Act provides for a complete machinery to challenge an order of assessment, and the

Maxopp Investment Ltd and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Income Tax

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 260A, 14A; Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 8D; Finance Act, 2002

to income which does not form part of the total income under this Act."7. By virtue of the Finance Act, 2002, the following proviso was inserted in section 14A and was deemed to have been inserted with effect from … all pending proceedings?3. Whether Rule 8D inserted by the Income -tax (Fifth Amendment) Rules, 2008 with effect from 24/03/2008 was procedural in nature and hence would apply retrospectively to all pending proceedings?3. In order to provide some