Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2002 section 22 · Page 1 of about 5,839 results (0.093 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 29 2016

M/S Madras Petrochem Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Bifr and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-29-2016

Subject : Company

right to realise their security under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 will continue to have full play. Where, under SectionAct or the rules made thereunder shall be in addition to, and not in derogation of, the Industrial Finance Corporation Act, 1948 (15 of 1948), the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 (63 of 1951), the Unit Trust

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 2004

Saurashtra Education Foundation Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-04-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(15), 10(22) and 11(1); Finance Act, 2002; ;Finance Act, 1983

Reported in : (2004)190CTR(Guj)295; [2005]273ITR139(Guj)

Direct Taxation - exemption - Sections 2 (15), 10 (22) and 11 (1) of Income Tax Act, 1961, Finance Act, 2002 and Finance Act, 1983 - whether assessee-trust entitled to exemption under Section 10 (22) - Section 10 (22)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 2016

JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Mahar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-25-2016

Subject : MRTP

right to realize their security under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 will continue to have full play. 4. Where, under … where there are more than one secured creditor of a sick industrial company or it has been jointly financed by secured creditors, and at least 60% of such secured creditors in value of the amount outstanding as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 17 2016

M/s. Veesons Energy Systems Pvt., Ltd. Rep. By its Managing Director T ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Nov-17-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

right to realise their security under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 will continue to have full play. (4) Where, under … where there are more than one secured creditor of a sick industrial company or it has been jointly financed by secured creditors, and at least 60 per cent of such secured creditors in value of the amount

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2005

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Aditya Chemicals Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-29-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(a),2(24), 2(45), 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 6, 14, 22(1), 22(4), 23(1), 23(2), 34(2), 64, 72, 80, 139, 39(1), 139(2), 139(3), 148, 153(1), 260A, 271, 271(2) and 271A ; Finance Act, 2002; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2 and 28(1); Finance Act, 1988; Finance Act, 1951 - Sections 2(7)

Reported in : (2005)197CTR(Del)241; [2006]283ITR458(Delhi)

23(1), 23(2), 34(2), 64, 72, 80, 139, 39(1), 139(2), 139(3), 148, 153(1), 260A, 271, 271(2) and 271A ; Finance Act, 2002; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2 and 28(1); Finance Act, 1988; Finance Act, 1951 - Section 2(7)Cases … total income which he was required to furnish by notice given under Sub-section (1) or Sub-section (2) of Section 22 or Section 34 or has without reasonable cause failed to furnish it within the time allowed and in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2008

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Narela, Delhi Vs. Commissioner ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-21-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 10, 10(20), 10(26AAB) and 260A; Finance Act, 2002; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1998 - Sections 5, 22(1), 22(2), 62 65, 88, 88(1), 88(2) and 88(3); Delhi Development Act, 1957; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 32; Constitution of India (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India - Articles 243, 243P, 243 and 243ZF

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(SC)433; [2008]305ITR1(SC); JT2008(10)SC17; 2008(11)SCALE540; (2008)9SCC434; 2008AIRSCW6285; 2008(6)Supreme520; 2008(11)SCALE540

the 1961 Act prior to its amendment by Finance Act, 2002 w.e.f. 1.4.03.10. Prior to the amendment by Finance Act, 2002, Section 10(20) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 provided as under:CHAPTER IIIINCOME WHICH DO NOT FORM PART OF TOTAL INCOMEIncomes … make recommendations to the Director for establishing principal market and sub-markets as per provisions of Sub-section (2) of Section 22; (b) to approve proposal for providing infrastructural facilities in the market and market area; (c) to construct a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2005

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-30-2005

Subject : Sales TaxCivil

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; Bihar Finance Act, 1981 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(9), 7, 7(3), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(2) and 16; Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000; Central Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1957 - Sections 14, 22 and 23; First Schedule of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 4A(6); General Clauses Act - Sections 4A; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 15C

Reported in : AIR2005SC2871; 2005(2)BLJR1168; 2005(99)ECC689; [2005(2)JCR235(SC)]; JT2005(3)SC582; (2005)4SCC272; [2005]140STC284(SC)

(HRM). It is registered as a dealer both under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 (1981 Act). It was granted an industrial licence for expansion of its existing industrial unit located at … application of the notifications bearing Nos. 65, 66 & 67 dated 12thJanuary, 2002 issued by the State of Jharkhand pursuant to the Jharkhand Industrial Policy, … sale;' 20. Section 14 provides for registration of dealers. Section 16 mandates filing of return by a dealer. Section 22 empowers the State Government to permit any dealer, or class or description of dealers who are running manufacturing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2013

Salem Textiles Limited Vs. Authorized Officer of Phoenix Arc Private L ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-22-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

High Court went to the extent of holding that in the light of Section 35 of the Securitisation Act, 2002, Section 22 of SICA does not survive anymore. (vi) In Nabha Industries Ltd vs. Punjab State Industrial Development Corporation {(2010) … after independence. But, even at that time, the Parliament was conscious of the fact that recovery of amounts financed by State Financial Corporations to industries, may pose difficulties, if the Financial Corporations are also required to follow

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2014

Commissioner Income Tax-i Vs. Chd Developers Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-22-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

2004 (23 of 2004), sec. 18(d), for sub-section (10) w.e.f. 1-4-2005). Earlier subsection (10) was amended by the Finance Act, 2000 (10 of 2001), sec. 39(e)(i) and (ii) (w.e.f. 1.4.2001), by Finance Act, 2003 (32 of 2003), Sec … assessee which is beyond the control and power of the assessee. Our attention was also invited to page 22 of the paper book containing a certificate signed by the Architect of the assessee i.e. Candid Design Consortium

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 2006

Goldcrest Finance (India) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-31-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)105TTJ(Mum.)926

found as provided under the provisions of Section 158BB of the Act. Part of section was amended by Finance Act, 2002 with retrospective effect from 1st July, 1995 and it has been provided that the total income for the … is made without serving of such notice then such assessment would be without jurisdiction and null and void." 22. Before concluding, the Tribunal also held that the provisions of Section 292B have no application to the facts

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial