Advanced Search Results

Tata Sky Limited Vs. the State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; ; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 4; ; Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1979 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4A, 4A(4), 4B and 4C; ; Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax (Amendment) Act, 2009; ; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 65(5), 65(13), 65(63), 65(72) and 137; ; Prasar Bharti (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990 - Section 2; ; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 65, 66(5), 65(14), 65(15), 65(80) and 65(90); ; Finance Act, 2003 - Section 65, 65(16), 65(95), 65(105) and 66(1); ; Finance Act, 2004; ; Finance Act, 2005 - Section 65(16) and 65(105); ; Government of India Act, 1935; ; Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995; ; Bengal Amusements Tax Act, 1922; ; We

the gross amount charged by the service provider).19(ii). The term 'broadcasting' was re-defined under Section 65(14) of the Finance Act, 2002 as under:65. Definitions.- In this Chapter, unless the context otherwise requires,-(14). 'broadcasting' has the meaning assigned to it … No. 2562 of 2007 and Writ Petition (M/S) No. 353 of 2008, the term 'entertainment' was defined in Section 2(g) of the Entertainment Act, 1979, as under:2. Definitions.- In this Act,-(g) 'entertainment' includes any exhibition, performance, amusement, game,

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Zam Zam Tanners

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961- Sections 2(24), 17, 28, 41, 44, 45, 59, 80HHC, 139(1), 139(3), 143(1A), 143, 144, 147, 160(1), 256(2), 271, 271(1) and 280D; ;Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975; ;Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 271(1); ;Finance Act, 1993 - Sections 143(1A); ;Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : (2005)197CTR(All)221; [2005]279ITR197(All)

have been concealed or inaccurate particulars have been furnished.'Section 271(1)(c) of the Act has been further amended by Finance Act, 2002, by which Clause (iii) and Expln. 4 has been modified. After the amendment section reads as follows :'(iii) … Rajes Kumar, J.1. The Tribunal has referred the following question under Section 256(2) of the IT Act (hereinafter referred to as 'Act') relating to the asst. yr. 1985-86 for opinion to

Saurashtra Education Foundation Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(15), 10(22) and 11(1); Finance Act, 2002; ;Finance Act, 1983

Reported in : (2004)190CTR(Guj)295; [2005]273ITR139(Guj)

Direct Taxation - exemption - Sections 2 (15), 10 (22) and 11 (1) of Income Tax Act, 1961, Finance Act, 2002 and Finance Act, 1983 - whether assessee-trust entitled to exemption under Section 10 (22) - Section 10 (22)

Smt. Jyoti M. Bhandari Vs. Asstt Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)6SOT375(Ahd.)

relied upon by the assessees are prior to the amendment by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 and Finance Act, 2002 with retrospective effect from 1-7-1995. The Explanation which the assessees relied upon was inserted by Finance (No. 2) … These two appeals by two assessees are against the orders of assessing officer passed under section 158BD read with section 158BC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the block period 1-4-1985 to 31-3-1995

Commissioner of Income Tax 5 Mumbai Vs. M/S. Essar Teleholdings Ltd. T ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

to earn exempt income by applying the provisions of newly inserted section 14A of the Act.” 17. By Finance Act, 2002, a statutory provision was also inserted by way of proviso to Section 14A. What was clarified by the … 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.2165 OF 2012 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 MUMBAI … APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M/S. ESSAR TELEHOLDINGS LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGER … RESPONDENT(S)

Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajkot Vs. Gujarat Siddhi Cement Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32A, 33, 35(1), 35A, 36(1), 41(1), 43, 43A, 43A(1), 43A(2), 48, 50 and 260A; Finance Act, 2002; Finance Act, 1967 - Sections 43A; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 2

Reported in : (2008)220CTR(SC)217; [2008]307ITR393(SC); 2008(13)SCALE742

Section 33. It is to be noted that Section 43A in the present form was substituted by the Finance Act, 2002 w.e.f. 1.4.2003. Prior to its substitution Section 43A as inserted by the Finance Act, 1967 w.e.f. 1.4.67 and … the Finance Act, 1967 w.e.f. 1.4.67 and amended by Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987 w.e.f. 1.4.1989 contained Sub-section (2). The said Sub-section as it stood at the relevant point of time clearly stated that the provisions of

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi Vs. Woodward Governor India P. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28, 29, 30 to 43D, 48, 50, 56, 143, 143(1), 143(2), 144, 145, 145(1), 145(2) and 145(3); Finance Act, 2002; Companies Act - Sections 209; Finance Act, 1967

Reported in : (2009)223CTR(SC)1; [2009]312ITR254(SC); JT2009(5)SC378; 2009(5)SCALE198; (2009)13SCC1; [2009]179TAXMAN326(SC); 2009(3)LC1519(SC); [2009] 5 SCR 738

Counsel next contended that on a proper and true interpretation of the amendment to Section 43A, introduced by Finance Act, 2002, Section 43A is clarificatory. According to the learned Counsel, the occasion for the clarificatory amendment arose in view of … the assessee(s) incurring loss on revenue account. In that category, we are concerned with the provisions of Sections 28, 29, 37(1) and 145 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('1961 Act'). In the second category of cases, we

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Narela, Delhi Vs. Commissioner ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 10, 10(20), 10(26AAB) and 260A; Finance Act, 2002; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1998 - Sections 5, 22(1), 22(2), 62 65, 88, 88(1), 88(2) and 88(3); Delhi Development Act, 1957; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 32; Constitution of India (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act, 1992; Constitution of India - Articles 243, 243P, 243 and 243ZF

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(SC)433; [2008]305ITR1(SC); JT2008(10)SC17; 2008(11)SCALE540; (2008)9SCC434; 2008AIRSCW6285; 2008(6)Supreme520; 2008(11)SCALE540

the 1961 Act prior to its amendment by Finance Act, 2002 w.e.f. 1.4.03.10. Prior to the amendment by Finance Act, 2002, Section 10(20) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 provided as under:CHAPTER IIIINCOME WHICH DO NOT FORM PART OF TOTAL INCOMEIncomes … short).3. For the sake of convenience we refer to the facts mentioned in Civil Appeal No. 8180 of 2008 (arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 6757 of 2007) filed by AMC, Narela, Delhi.4. Appellant-Committee is established under

Commr. of Income Tax Vs. Gujarat Maritime Board

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Gujarat Maritime Board Act, 1981 - Sections 3(2), 25, 26, 73, 74 and 75; General Clause Act, 1897 - Sections 3(31); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(15), 10(20), 11, 11(1), 11(4), 11(16), 12A and 60 to 63; Finance Act, 2002; Gujarat Maritime Board Act, 1981; Indian Ports Act, 1903 - Sections 36; Banking Companies Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking Act, 1970 - Sections 2; Public Trust Act

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(SC)81; [2007]295ITR561(SC); 2007(14)SCALE21; 2007AIRSCW7912; 2008(3)KCCRSN199

income of the Board was not eligible to income-tax under Section 10(20) or the Income-tax Act, 1961.3. By finance Act, 2002, an Explanation was added in Section 10(20) by which 'Local Authority' was defined. It gave a restricted meaning … Board made an application to the Commissioner for registering it (Board) as a 'Charitable Institution' as defined under Section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter for the sake of brevity as '1961 Act'). Accordingly, they claimed exemption

Commissioner of Income Central Ii Vs. Suresh N. Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 4, 4(1), 32, 32(2), 68, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C, 112, 113, 115A, 115AB, 115AC, 115ACA, 115AD, 115B, 115BB, 115BBA, 115E, 115JB, 132, 132A, 132B, 139, 139(1), 142, 142(1), 143, 143(1B), 143(2), 143(3), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 158BA, 158BA(1), 158BA(2), 158BB, 158BB(1), 158BC, 158BH, 161, 161(1A), 164, 164A, 167B, 245D and 245D(4); Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 2(1), 2(2) and 2(3); Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 113; Finance Act, 1995; Constitution of India - Articles 269, 270 and 271

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(SC)274; [2008]297ITR322(SC); JT2008(1)SC208; 2008(1)SCALE99; (2008)4SCC362; 2008AIRSCW1066

respect of the search carried out on 17.1.2001; secondly, whether the proviso inserted in Section 113 by the Finance Act, 2002 is clarificatory?Whether Finance Act, 2001 was applicable to block assessment under Chapter XIV-B up to 1.06.2002:5. Chapter XIV-B … IV without giving effect to set off of brought forward losses under Chapter VI or unabsorbed depreciation under Sub-section (2) of Section 32;(b) of a firm, returned income and, total income assessed for each of the previous years