Advanced Search Results

Adityapur Industrial Area Development Authority Vs. Union of India (Uo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 2002; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10, 10(20), 10(20A), 28, 38 and 38(2); Bihar Industrial Areas Development Authority Act, 1974 - Sections 7 and 17; Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3; General Clauses Act - Sections 3(3); Contract Act; Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950; Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961; Constitution of India - Articles 243, 243P, 285, 289, 289(1), 289(2) and 289(3)

Reported in : AIR2006SC2375; (2006)202CTR(SC)464; [2006]283ITR97(SC); [2006(4)JCR202(SC)]; 2006(5)SCALE321; (2006)5SCC100; 2006(1)LC713(SC)

the Central Bank of India, Jamshedpur bringing to the notice of the Manager of the Bank that the Finance Act, 2002 had brought about changes in the Income Tax Act and while Section 10(20A) had been omitted, an Explanation … funds, cannot claim that its income is the income of the State. In particular, he laid emphasis on Section 17 of the Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority Act, 1974 which reads as follows:-When the State Government is satisfied

The Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. A.K. Khosla

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(3), 143(1), 143(3), 147 and 148; ;Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Section 7(1); ;Income Tax Rules - Rule 3; ;Finance Act, 1999 - Section 17(2); ;Finance Act, 2001; ;Finance Act, 2002 - Section 271; ;Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Section 2; ;Constitution of India - Article 20(1)

is answered accordingly.Further, this Court also considered the new provision of Section 17(3)(ii), which was inserted by the Finance Act, 2002 and held that the amendment is only prospective in nature and not retrospective and in paragraph 22, it

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Zam Zam Tanners

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961- Sections 2(24), 17, 28, 41, 44, 45, 59, 80HHC, 139(1), 139(3), 143(1A), 143, 144, 147, 160(1), 256(2), 271, 271(1) and 280D; ;Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975; ;Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 271(1); ;Finance Act, 1993 - Sections 143(1A); ;Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : (2005)197CTR(All)221; [2005]279ITR197(All)

have been concealed or inaccurate particulars have been furnished.'Section 271(1)(c) of the Act has been further amended by Finance Act, 2002, by which Clause (iii) and Expln. 4 has been modified. After the amendment section reads as follows :'(iii) … value of any perquisite or profit in lieu of salary taxable under Clauses (2) and (3) of Section 17;(iv) the value of any benefit or perquisite, whether convertible into money or not, obtained from a company either

Commissioner of Income Central Ii Vs. Suresh N. Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 4, 4(1), 32, 32(2), 68, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C, 112, 113, 115A, 115AB, 115AC, 115ACA, 115AD, 115B, 115BB, 115BBA, 115E, 115JB, 132, 132A, 132B, 139, 139(1), 142, 142(1), 143, 143(1B), 143(2), 143(3), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 158BA, 158BA(1), 158BA(2), 158BB, 158BB(1), 158BC, 158BH, 161, 161(1A), 164, 164A, 167B, 245D and 245D(4); Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 2(1), 2(2) and 2(3); Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 113; Finance Act, 1995; Constitution of India - Articles 269, 270 and 271

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(SC)274; [2008]297ITR322(SC); JT2008(1)SC208; 2008(1)SCALE99; (2008)4SCC362; 2008AIRSCW1066

respect of the search carried out on 17.1.2001; secondly, whether the proviso inserted in Section 113 by the Finance Act, 2002 is clarificatory?Whether Finance Act, 2001 was applicable to block assessment under Chapter XIV-B up to 1.06.2002:5. Chapter XIV-B

National Federation of Insurance Field Workers of India and anr. Vs. U ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 14, 15, 16, 17, 17(1), 17(2), 192(2C), 295, 295(2), 296 and 296(1); Finance Act - Sections 17(2); Income Tax (Amendment) Rules, 2001 - Rule 3

Reported in : (2004)187CTR(Uttranchal)180; [2004]265ITR84(Uttaranchal)

authority, to identify 'interest free loan/concessional loan' as a fringe benefit under Section 17(2)(vi) (as inserted by the Finance Act, 2001) with effect from April 1, 2002. In this connection, it was further argued that under Section 17(2)(vi)

Federal Bank Officers Association Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2004]140TAXMAN173(Ker)

writ petition. Petitioners seek for a declaration that section 17(2)(vi) of the Income Tax Act as inserted by Finance Act 2001 is illegal and violative of articles 19(1)(g) and 246 of the Constitution of India, and a declaration … computing the value of perquisite. They also rely on the budget speech rendered by the Finance Minister for 2002-03 which is extracted at page 7 of the original petition to the effect that it propose to provide

Salem Textiles Limited Vs. Authorized Officer of Phoenix Arc Private L ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

High Court went to the extent of holding that in the light of Section 35 of the Securitisation Act, 2002, Section 22 of SICA does not survive anymore. (vi) In Nabha Industries Ltd vs. Punjab State Industrial Development Corporation … Mardia Chemicals Ltd. v. Union of India (AIR 200.SC 2371). While upholding the provisions of the Act, except Section 17(2), the Supreme Court pointed out that there must be some fine tuning. Therefore, Act 54 of 2002 was … time, the Parliament was conscious of the fact that recovery of amounts financed by State Financial Corporations to industries, may pose difficulties, if the Financial

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Nagesh Devidas Kulkarni

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24), 10, 10(10C), 15, 16, 17, 17(1), 17(3), 57, 80CCC, 88, 89, 89(1), 143(1), 143(3), 147, 148 and 260A; University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Institutes of Technology Act, 1961 - Sections 3; Finance Act, 2002; Finance Act, 1993; Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 21A, 21AA and 21B

Reported in : (2007)210CTR(Bom)471; [2007]291ITR407(Bom)

in relation to any other assessment year;11. Section 89(1) of the Act as it stood prior to the Finance Act, 2002, reads as follows:Section 89 Relief when salary, etc., is paid in arrears or in advance.--(1) Where, by reason … of Rs. 5,00,000 is taxed in the hands of the assessee as profits in lieu of salary under Section 17(3) of the Act, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) held that in respect of the amount received in excess

State of Kerala Vs. Dr. George Jacob

Court : Kerala

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 17(6) and 17(7); Finance Act, 2002

Reported in : (2009)26VST304(Ker)

from March 31, 2002 and which remained in force till March 31, 2003. It is seen that the Finance Act, 2002 introduced an amendment to Section 17(6), whereby the limitation provided for assessment was five years instead of the

Vodafone International Holdings B.V., a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(17), 2(23A), 2(31), 2(37), 2(47), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5(2), 9, 9(1), 23(1), 23(3), 24, 26, 64, 64(2), 173, 191, 192(1A), 194, 194C(1), 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3), 197, 199, 200, 201, 203A, 221, 221(1), 201(1A), 245S, 246A and 271C; Foreign Contribution Regulation Act; Indian Official Secrets Act; Constitution Act; Information Technology Act; Indian Passport Act; Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18, 19 and 42; Finance Act, 2008; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; MRTP Act - Sections 33; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 201; Companies Act; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2008 - Sections 191 and 201; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2002; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 2003; Income Tax Rules - Rules 30 and 31A, 41E; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR258; (2008)220CTR(Bom)649; [2009]311ITR46(Bom)

which construed the provisions of Section 201 of the Act as they stood before the amendment of the Finance Act, 2002. Therefore, the same would not enable the Respondents to urge that after the 2002 amendments made in Section … 5, 9, and a host of other relevant provisions including the machinery provisions like those contained in Section 173, 195 and other provisions. The reference to other enactments such as FERA, FEMA , Indian Official Secrets Act,