Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2002 section 13 · Page 1 of about 9,196 results (0.149 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 11 2003

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jul-11-2003

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bihar Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas for Consumption Use or Sale Therein Act, 1993 - Sections 7; Bihar Finance Act, 1981 - Sections 16(9)

or Sale Therein Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') read with Section 16(9) of the Bihar Finance Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Finance Act') for not paying the admitted tax under the Act within time … 617 of the Companies Act, has filed the present writ application for quashing four orders dated 6th September, 2002 (Annexures 17 series) imposing penalty under Section 7(4) of the Bihar Tax on Entry of Goods into Local … were finally disposed of, which is reported in 1995 (2) BUR, Page 1389 and this Court held that the provision of the Act does not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 2009

Tata Steel Ltd. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-08-2009

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Bihar Finance Act, 1981 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4, 12, 12(2), 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3) and 49; Bihar Electricity Act, 1948; Bihar Finance Rules - Rule 13; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 301 and 304

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR2763

to Section 13(1) as inserted vide the notification No. SG 12/2001/AJ-01 dated 2.1.2002 (Annexure 4) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') as adopted by the State of Jharkhand is violative of Article

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 2005

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Parmanand M. Patel

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-06-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 - Sections 56; ;Marriage Act 1955 - Sections 15(2); ;Finance Act, 2002; ;Income Tax Act, 1922; ;Constitution of India - Article 141; ;Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 22A; ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(43), 139(1), 139(2), 142(2A), 143(3), 148, 256(1), 263, 271, 271(1), 271A, 271B, 272A(2), 274 and 275; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 3, 3(1), 7, 12, 12(3), 12(4), 12B (4), 13, 18, 18A, 22A and 28

Reported in : (2005)198CTR(Guj)641; [2005]278ITR3(Guj)

the Act, etc. 6.3 Inviting attention to the amendment made to Section 271(1) of the Act by the Finance Act, 2002 it was submitted that the said provision as it originally stood granted powers only to the Assessing Officer … a shortfall in tax paid in advance, a dealer is liable to pay penalty at the prescribed rates. Section 13 of the Karnataka Act deals with 'Payment and Recovery of Taxes'.28. Thus, in light of the scheme of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 05 2008

Krishna Lifestyle Technologies Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through t ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-05-2008

Subject : Excise

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 142; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2005 - Sections 13(6) and 35; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002; Finance Act, 2004 - Sections 11; Central Boards of Revenue Act, 1963 - Sections 11D; Customs Act, 1862; Karnataka Land Revenue Act - Sections 158 and 190; Contract Act - Sections 176; Central Sales Tax Act - Sections 9; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 100; State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29 and 29(2); Karnataka Sales Tax Act - Sections 15; State Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 25; Income Tax Act - Sections 2(13); Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Se

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR456; 2008BusLR314(Bom); 2008(125)ECC208; 2008(151)LC208(Bombay); 2008(229)ELT173(Bom); 2009[16]STR669

issues, it would be necessary to reproduce Section 11 along with the proviso which was inserted by the Finance Act No. 2 of 2004 to the Central Excise Act, 1944 and which reads as under:11. Recovery of sums … takes place under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. 4. Does the mere purchase of the immovable/movable assets of a tax defaulter amount to transfer or disposal … a transfer by the owner of the property. The language of Section 13(6) of the SARFAESI Act would have had the same effect. Any transfer

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 2006

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Purshottam Khatri

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-25-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 5(1), 6(6), 10(4), 80L, 131, 132, 132(4), 143(3), 158BB(1), 158BC and 260A; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 13 and 14; Finance Act, 2002

Reported in : [2007]290ITR260(MP); 2006(3)MPLJ131

observations.Mr. Rohit Arya, learned Counsel very fairly submitted that Section 158BB of the Act has been amended by Finance Act of 2002 w.e.f. 1st July, 1995 and the effect of such amendment is that the undisclosed income for … the said deposits were out of his income which had arisen or accrued to him outside India. Since Section 13 of the FERA imposed restrictions on the import of foreign currency into India, he could establish this fact

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2010

Tata Sky Limited Vs. the State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Jul-26-2010

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; ; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 4; ; Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1979 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4A, 4A(4), 4B and 4C; ; Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax (Amendment) Act, 2009; ; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 65(5), 65(13), 65(63), 65(72) and 137; ; Prasar Bharti (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990 - Section 2; ; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 65, 66(5), 65(14), 65(15), 65(80) and 65(90); ; Finance Act, 2003 - Section 65, 65(16), 65(95), 65(105) and 66(1); ; Finance Act, 2004; ; Finance Act, 2005 - Section 65(16) and 65(105); ; Government of India Act, 1935; ; Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995; ; Bengal Amusements Tax Act, 1922; ; We

the gross amount charged by the service provider).19(ii). The term 'broadcasting' was re-defined under Section 65(14) of the Finance Act, 2002 as under:65. Definitions.- In this Chapter, unless the context otherwise requires,-(14). 'broadcasting' has the meaning assigned to it … Section 66(5) is being reproduced hereunder:66. Charge of service tax.-(5) With effect from the date notified under Section 137 of the Finance Act, 2001, there shall be levied a service tax at the rate of five per

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 2012

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-i Vs. Joint Secretary(Revisionar ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-02-2012

Subject : Excise

1957, Additional Duties of Excise (Textiles and Textiles Articles) Act, 1978 and special excise duty collected under the Finance Act. CVD was not specifically stipulated and treated as the duty paid under the notification No. 41/2001. It is … on the inputs utilized for manufacture. These applications were made under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, read with notification No. 21/2004-CE(NT) dated 6th September, 2004. In some cases, the applications were dismissed, in others … (40 of 1978); (d) the National Calamity Contingent duty leviable under section 136 of the Finance Act, 2001 (14 of 2001), as amended by Section … Central Excise, Delhi-I impugning orders passed by the Government of India under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act, 1944(Act, for short). The said orders

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2014

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-2014

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … for the credit of the duty paid. This was a case falling under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act 2002. The challenge in this case was to the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra Value Added … as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six months. 13. By the impugned judgment and order dated 6.1.2012 passed by the Tribunal,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2003

Unique Engineering Works Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Dec-15-2003

Subject : BankingSICA

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Debt Recovery Tribunal Act, 1993; ;Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provision) Act, 1985 - Sections 15 and 22; Impunged Act, 2002; Non-performing Asset Act, 2002 - Sections 2, 2(1), 5, 9, 12, 13(2), 13(4), 13(5), 13(8), 13(13), 17(2), 19 and 31; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 172; Debt Recovery Tribunal (Amendment) Act, 2003; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 60

Reported in : II(2004)BC241

Extraordinary and urgent situations demand extraordinary remedial measures particularly in economics and finance. With globalization, India has become a signatory to various International Conventions, which … C.P.C., any security interest created in agricultural land etc. as mentioned in Section 31 of the impugned NPA Act, 2002. Section 5 of the impugned NPA Act, 2002 deals with acquisition of rights/interest in financial assets. Under Section 5, … Asset (NPA) Act, 2002 has been enacted.Arguments :3. Mr. Dhulia, learned Counsel for the petitioner firstly contended that Section 13(2) and Section 13(4) are bad in law as they do not provide for any opportunity to the borrower,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2005

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-30-2005

Subject : Sales TaxCivil

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; Bihar Finance Act, 1981 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(9), 7, 7(3), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(2) and 16; Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000; Central Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1957 - Sections 14, 22 and 23; First Schedule of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 4A(6); General Clauses Act - Sections 4A; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 15C

Reported in : AIR2005SC2871; 2005(2)BLJR1168; 2005(99)ECC689; [2005(2)JCR235(SC)]; JT2005(3)SC582; (2005)4SCC272; [2005]140STC284(SC)

(HRM). It is registered as a dealer both under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 (1981 Act). It was granted an industrial licence for expansion of its existing industrial unit located at … application of the notifications bearing Nos. 65, 66 & 67 dated 12thJanuary, 2002 issued by the State of Jharkhand pursuant to the Jharkhand Industrial Policy, … description of goods to or by any class of dealers.19. Section 12 provides for rate of tax whereas Section 13 provides for special rate of tax on certain sales or purchases. Section 13(1)(b) of the 1981 Act reads

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial