Advanced Search Results

Rajbhushan Omprakash Dixit vs.union of India & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

and the Union of India through the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance (Respondent No.1) to provide him a certified copy of ECIR/HQ/17/2017 dated 27th … B IPC. Since the offences were also those mentioned in the Schedule to the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA), the DOE recorded an Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) being ECIR/HQ/15/2017 in relation to the offence of … (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act) read with Section 120 B IPC. Since the offences were also those mentioned in the Schedule to the Prevention of Money Laundering

Vijay Madanlal Choudhary Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

it shall be presumed that such proceeds of crime is involved in money-laundering.” 371 The Standing Committee of Finance then made some recommendations as follows: “The Committee recommend that the prescribed onus of proof that the property … 8 of the Suppression Of Unlawful Acts Against Safety Of Maritime Navigation and Fixed Platforms On Continental Shelf Act, 2002; Section 212 of the Companies Act, 2013; and Section 12 of the Anti-Hijacking Act, 2016. State Legislations:- Section 19

Vadlamani Srinivas @ Srinivas Vs. Union of India, Ministry of Finance, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Education

JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION Nos.685; 691 o”12. 02-2013 Vadlamani Srinivas @ Srinivas Union of India, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi and two others. Counsel for the petitioner: Sri B. Nalin Kumar Counsel for respondents : Sri … 21 of the Constitution of India, and in violation of the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA). They seek a consequential direction from this Court to declare the whole proceedings in the C.B.I. cases … charge sheets in C.C.Nos.1, 2 and 3 of 2010 for offences under Sections 120-B, 406, 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 477-A IPC. The

Sarla Performance Fibers Ltd. Etc. Vs. C.C.E., Surat-Ii

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

be sold’ has since been replaced with ‘brought to any other place’ w.e.f. 11-5-2001 vide Section 120 of Finance Act, 2001 [14 of 2001]..2. It has come to the notice of the Board that field formations are interpreting … show cause notice was filed, the Commissioner of Central Excise, Surat-II, by his order-in-original No.11/MP/2002 dated 21st March, 2002 (i) confiscated the seized nylon covered yarn weighing 245.980 kgs. valued at Rs.1,72,186/- and appropriated a sum of

State by Cbi/Acb Vs. A.N. Dhyaneswaran,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 397 and 401

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2802

have availed the advantage of a scheme brought out by the Revenue Department of the Central Government i.e., Finance Act ( No.2) of 1998. The said Scheme is called Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as … common order passed by the learned Principal Special Judge for CBI Cases, Chennai in Cr.M.P.Nos.96 and 549 of 2002 in C.C.No. 9 of 2001 dated 7-1-2003 in allowing the above petitions filed by the respondents herein.2. The … not satisfactorily account for. A1 was charge sheeted for the offence under sections 420 and Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, … 92 and 70 years and also on facts, the ingredients of Sections 120-B, 420 and 415 were not made out and therefore applying the principles

P.S.Murthy, and ors. Vs. the State Represented by Inspector of Police,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code Of Criminal Procedure (CRPC), 1973 - Sections 397, 401

actions of the appellants in breach of codal provisions, instructions and procedural safeguards, the State may have suffered financially, particularly by allotment of work on nomination basis without inviting tenders, but those acts of omission and commission … for offences under Sections 120-B r/w 420 IPC and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of the Corruption Act.2. The Accused 1 to 14 filed petitions before the trial Court seeking discharge, but the petitions were dismissed. … (Cri.) 1025 (C.Chenga Reddy and others v. State of Andhra Pradesh) and 2002(1) SCC(Cri.) 310 (Dilawar Balu Kurane vs. State of Maharashtra).13. In addition, it … the Inspector of Police-CBI, Chennai, totally against 15 accused for offences under Sections 120-B r/w 420 IPC and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of

Commissioner of Central Excise, Raipur Vs. M/S. Lloyd Tar Products

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

taxable services of goods transport operators are deemed to pay the service tax under section 69 of the Finance Act, 1994, but liablity to file return is cast on them only under section 71A and not under section … the light of the above amendment, show cause notices were issued to various recipients in or around November, 2002. The said show cause notice culminated into an order passed by the original authority vide which he confirmed

Dhirendra Kumar Banerjee and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bihar Co-operative Societies Act, 1935 - Sections 41 and 48; Jharkhand Cooperative Societies Act, 2002; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156(3), 202 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 420 and 468

Reported in : 2005CriLJ4791; [2005(3)JCR141a(Jhr)]

not conferred with power to decide the question. In this connection reliance was placed upon Ashiana Housing and Finance (India) Ltd. v. State of Jharkhand, 2003 (2) JCR 188 {Jhr).10. It was also submitted that power under … comes within the purview of Registrar Cooperative Society under Bihar Co-operative Societies Act, 1935 (Now Jharkhand Cooperative Societies Act, 2002) and Section 48 and 41 deal that no approach by any Member of Co-operative Society to the Registrar … CJM, Ranchi took cognizance. against the petitioners under Sections 468, 420 and 120-B, IPC.2. Facts leading to the filing of this application are that opposite

Santiago Martin vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

SRI.MUKUL ROHATGI SRI.RAMESH BABU (SR.) SRI.A.KUMAR SMT.G.MINI RESPONDENTS: 1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI - 110001 2 THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, COCHIN ZONAL OFFICE, KANOOS CASTLE, A.K SHESHADRI ROAD, … warned of the perils of such baneful conduct. India responded with a Statute named Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (for short 'the PMLA'). Petitioners challenge a proceeding initiated under the aforestated statute.2. Properties of the petitioners have … No.218 of 2015 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam, are under sections 120(b) and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 apart from various

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Aditya Chemicals Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(a),2(24), 2(45), 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 6, 14, 22(1), 22(4), 23(1), 23(2), 34(2), 64, 72, 80, 139, 39(1), 139(2), 139(3), 148, 153(1), 260A, 271, 271(2) and 271A ; Finance Act, 2002; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2 and 28(1); Finance Act, 1988; Finance Act, 1951 - Sections 2(7)

Reported in : (2005)197CTR(Del)241; [2006]283ITR458(Delhi)

23(1), 23(2), 34(2), 64, 72, 80, 139, 39(1), 139(2), 139(3), 148, 153(1), 260A, 271, 271(2) and 271A ; Finance Act, 2002; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2 and 28(1); Finance Act, 1988; Finance Act, 1951 - Section 2(7)Cases … 224 ITR 677 (SC); Brij Mohan Das Laxman Das v. CIT, (1997) 223 ITR 825 (SC) : (1979) 120 ITR 1 (SC); CWT v. Ram Narain Agrawal, (1977) 106, ITR 965 (All); CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd.,