Advanced Search Results

Jindal thermal Power Company Limited (Formerly Jindal Tracteble Power ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 10, 10A, 10B, 11, 12, 80HHC, 80HHC(3), 80HHF(3), 112, 113, 115A, 115AA, 115AB, 115ACA, 115AD, 115B, 115BB, 115BBA, 115E, 115JB, 119(2), 140A, 154, 161(1A), 164, 164A, 167B, 172(4), 174(2), 175, 176(2), 192, 207, 208 to 219, 234A, 234B and 234C; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 115J, 115J(1), 115JA, 115JB(1) and 115JB; Finance Act, 1987; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1996; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections115B and 115JB; Finance (Amendment) Act, 2000; Finance (Amendment) Act, 2002; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 210; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3, 17(1), 32(2), 32A(3), 72(1), 73, 74, 74A(3), 139(1), 142(1) and 288(2); Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 2(8); Constitution of India - Articles 265 and 300A

Reported in : (2006)203CTR(Kar)381; [2006]286ITR182(KAR); [2006]286ITR182(Karn)

respondent seeks to rely as is seemingly done in view of the amendment of Section 115JB effected by Finance Act, 2002 with retrospective effect from 1.4.2001 enabling him to levy such interest. The said amendment in so far as … relatable to any income to which Section 10 or Section 10A or Section 10B or Section 11 or Section 12 apply,if any amount referred to in Clauses (a) to (f) is debited to the profit and loss account,

Tata Steel Ltd. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Bihar Finance Act, 1981 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4, 12, 12(2), 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3) and 49; Bihar Electricity Act, 1948; Bihar Finance Rules - Rule 13; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 301 and 304

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR2763

to Section 13(1) as inserted vide the notification No. SG 12/2001/AJ-01 dated 2.1.2002 (Annexure 4) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') as adopted by the State of Jharkhand is violative of Article

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Mangalam Cement Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)7STR673

in one case (Service Tax Appeal No. 2/23 of 2005) of Rs. 60,26,508/- under Section 73(2) of the Finance Act, 1994, imposing penalty of Rs. 48,700/- under Section 76 and ordering interest amount of Rs. 8,84,287/- under Section … L.H. Sugar Factories Ltd. (supra) that the show cause notice was issued in that case in the year 2002 and it is in that context the Tribunal concluded in para 9 that the show cause notice issued

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Parmanand M. Patel

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 - Sections 56; ;Marriage Act 1955 - Sections 15(2); ;Finance Act, 2002; ;Income Tax Act, 1922; ;Constitution of India - Article 141; ;Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 22A; ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(43), 139(1), 139(2), 142(2A), 143(3), 148, 256(1), 263, 271, 271(1), 271A, 271B, 272A(2), 274 and 275; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 3, 3(1), 7, 12, 12(3), 12(4), 12B (4), 13, 18, 18A, 22A and 28

Reported in : (2005)198CTR(Guj)641; [2005]278ITR3(Guj)

the Act, etc. 6.3 Inviting attention to the amendment made to Section 271(1) of the Act by the Finance Act, 2002 it was submitted that the said provision as it originally stood granted powers only to the Assessing Officer … the High Court of Karnataka, the High Court took the view that the determination of tax contemplated under Section 12(3) of the Karnataka Act took within its ambit the levy of penalty under Section 18A of the Act

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify in this behalf:26. Section 10(20A) and 10(23) were deleted/omitted by Finance Act, 2002, w.e.f. 01.04.2003. While both these provisions are not directly relevant for deciding the primary question (i.e., as to … 2(15), the definition clause ............................................................................... 70 Summation of interpretation of Section 2(15) ............................................................................................... 85 C. Sections 10, 11, 12, 12A, 12AA and 13 of the IT Act ................................................................................ 86 Distinction between business held under Trust [Section 11(4)].

Merit Enterprises Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)288ITR226(Hyd.)

short issue in this appeal is whether the levy of surcharge in terms of the provisions of the Finance Act, 2002, is valid in a block assessment made under Section 158BC of the Income-tax Act. The tax has to … judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CWT, Ahmedabad v. Ellis Bridge Gymkhana 1998 SCC 120, specifically at page 121, paragraphs 5 and 6. Retroactivity in operation has to be ruled out as the

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales TaxMedia and Communication

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11; Constitution (46th Amendment) Act, 1982; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 32, 131, 136, 141, 226, 246(1), 248(1), 286, 366, 366(12) and 366(29A); Customs Act - Sections 2(22); Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65(16), 65(72) and 66; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 149(90) and 149(92); Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 159(104), 159(105), 159(110) and 159 (111); Government of India Act, 1935; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 11 and 12; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963; Madhya Bharat Sales Tax Act, 1950; Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act - Sections 2; Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 2(7); State Sales Tax Act; Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 - Sections 2; Telegr

Reported in : AIR2006SC1383; (2006)4CompLJ330(SC); (2006)201CTR(SC)346; [2006]282ITR273(SC); JT2006(3)SC114; 2006(2)SCALE752; (2006)3SCC1; [2006]145STC91(SC); 2006[2]STR161; [2006]152; [2006] 2 SCR 823

concerned with two amendments, one made in 2002 and the other in 2003. By Section 149(90)(b) of the Finance Act, 2002, service to a subscriber by a telephone authority was continued as a taxable service. 'Telegraph' was defined in … of A.P. (1999) 113 STC 203, and Punjab & Haryana Union of India v. State of Haryana (2001) 123 STC 539 all held that there was no sale of goods under the State Sales Tax Acts justifying

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

11-AC of the Finance Act,1994 was also imposed by the said order. 12. As regards the stay application, by an order dated 1.5.2007 passed in … amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … for the credit of the duty paid. This was a case falling under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act 2002. The challenge in this case was to the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra Value Added

Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. THE UNION OF ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Added Tax Act, 2002 ( the MVAT Act ); the definitions under Sections 65(105)(zzr), 65(55a) and 65(55b) of the Finance Act, 1994; and sub-clause (c) … impregnated seed is a service, and this is liable to be taxed under the relevant provisions of the Finance Act as amended, read with the Rules that pertain to service tax. This is a central levy. The transaction … with whom it deals is not, and cannot be, a sale assessable under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 ( the MVAT Act ). Mr. Venkatraman insists that the transaction in question involves no transfer of a … of Service Tax. Respondent No. 4 is the Commissioner of Sales Tax. 12. The Monsanto Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,

Central Coalfields Ltd. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bihar Entry Tax Act, 1993 - Sections 2, 2(9), 3 and 6; Jharkhand Entry Tax (Amendment) Ordinance, 2001; Jharkhand Entry Tax (Amendment) Ordinance, 2002; Constitution of India - Articles 255, 301, 302, 303, 303(1), 303(2) and 304; Bihar Finance Act, 1981 - Sections 12(1); Assam Taxation (On Goods Carried By Roads and Inland Waterways) Act, 1954; Rajasthan Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1951; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(28); Kerala Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicle into Local Act, 1944 - Sections 2 and 3; Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rules 2 and 92(2)

Reported in : (2007)6VST614(Jharkh)

therein.[Provided that in case of such goods which are liable to tax under Section 12(1) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, entry of goods shall mean entry of goods into local area front any place outside the State … Goods into Local Areas for Consumption, Use or Sale thereof (Amendment) Ordinance, 2001' [Jharkhand Ordinance No. 02 of 2002- hereinafter to be referred as 'Jharkhand Entry Tax (Amendment) Ordinance, 2001'] as violative of Articles 301 and 304