Advanced Search Results

Allied Instruments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2002)LC634Tri(Mum.)bai

Matched in: Citation (2002)LC634Tri(Mum.)bai

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

CJI1 Leave granted. BRIEF BACKGROUND:2. In the present batch of cases, the constitutionality of Part XIV of the Finance Act, 2017 and of the rules framed in consonance has been assailed. While it would be repetitious to reproduce … Section 13 (5- A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest (SARFAESI) Act, 2002 which permits secured creditors to participate in auction of immoveable property if it remained unsold for want of … adjudge the nature of a bill sought to be introduced under Article 109. Such decision was both final and hence not subject to any judicial

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … for the credit of the duty paid. This was a case falling under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act 2002. The challenge in this case was to the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra Value Added … (VI) Bharti Tele Ventures Ltd vs. State of Maharashtra, ( 2007 Vol 109 (1) Bom L.R. 0585); (VII) Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay Vs. Indian

Melville Finvest Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of I.T. -

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)89ITD528(Hyd.)

other hand, pleaded that there has been an amendment in Explanation to Section 73 brought out by the Finance Act, 1987, with effect from 1.4.1987, and the expression "other than a company as defined in Clause (ii) of … 1987, with effect from 1.4.1987, and the expression "other than a company as defined in Clause (ii) of Section 109" that figured in the said Explanation earlier had been substituted by the expression--"other than a company, whose gross

Modern Denim Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Excise

of special importance.7. Shri M.K. Gupta, learned Jt. C.D.R. also argues that in view of Clause (c) of Section 109 of the Finance Act, 2000, recovery is required to be made of all such duties of excise which … of 1962) and the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975)." 2. After the amendment made by the Finance Act, 2000 retrospectively w.e.f. 11/05/1982, the said proviso to Section 3(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read as … Bench int he case of Fabworth (India) Ltd. v. C.C.E. Nagpur - 2002 (143) E.L.T. 663 where it has been decided that Notification 2/95 grants

Maxopp Investment Ltd.. Vs. commr.of i.t New Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

and sub-sections (2) and (3) were added thereto. Before that, a proviso was also added by amendment vide Finance Act, 2002 which was to operate retrospectively from May 11, 2001. In these batch of appeals, we are not concerned … Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) contains the provisions pertaining to ‘computation of total income’. Section 14 which is the first provision under this Chapter enumerates five heads of income within which all income

Directorate of Enforcement vs.punjab National Bank & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

17th January, 2003, came into force w.e.f. 01.07.2005 and has been amended more than once, lastly by the Finance Act, 2018 and the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018. It was brought on the statute book with the … CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT1 These five appeals presented under Section 42 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 (“PMLA”, for short) against more or less similar orders of the appellate tribunal (constituted under Section 25), such

The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement vs.state Bank of India ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

17th January, 2003, came into force w.e.f. 01.07.2005 and has been amended more than once, lastly by the Finance Act, 2018 and the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018. It was brought on the statute book with the … CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT1 These five appeals presented under Section 42 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 (“PMLA”, for short) against more or less similar orders of the appellate tribunal (constituted under Section 25), such

Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement vs.idbi Bank Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

17th January, 2003, came into force w.e.f. 01.07.2005 and has been amended more than once, lastly by the Finance Act, 2018 and the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018. It was brought on the statute book with the … CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT1 These five appeals presented under Section 42 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 (“PMLA”, for short) against more or less similar orders of the appellate tribunal (constituted under Section 25), such

The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement Delhi vs.axis Bank &amp ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

17th January, 2003, came into force w.e.f. 01.07.2005 and has been amended more than once, lastly by the Finance Act, 2018 and the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018. It was brought on the statute book with the … CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT1 These five appeals presented under Section 42 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 (“PMLA”, for short) against more or less similar orders of the appellate tribunal (constituted under Section 25), such