Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2001 section 97 · Page 1 of about 2,024 results (0.059 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 04 2005

O.K. Play (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise-ii, New Delh ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-04-2005

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 11A, 11A(1), 11A(2), 11A(3) and 35L; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9, 9(2) and 173G; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975 - Rule 6; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 97, 97B and 110

Reported in : AIR2005SC1031; 2005(98)ECC633; 2005(180)ELT291(SC); JT2005(2)SC208; (2005)2SCC555

Section 11A of Central ExciseAct, 1944, under Finance Act 2000.---------------------------------------------------Attention is invited to the provisions contained in Sections 97 and 110 of the Finance Act, 2000.2. Queries have been raised from field formations about the exact scope … not levied or not paid or short levied or short paid or erroneously refunded - Retrospective validation by Finance Act, 2000 of action taken under Section 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944.---------------------------------------------------Subject: Retrospective validation of action takenunder Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2002

Markfed Oil and Allied Industries Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Aug-09-2002

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2002)(84)ECC860

dated 14-12-2001 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise in exercise of powers under Section 84 of the Finance Act, 1994.2. Shri K.K. Anand, learned Advocate, submitted that as per Rule 2(d)(l) xvii of Service Tax Rules, 1994,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 2008

South Indian Bank Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-28-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act - Sections 28, 36(1), 139, 142(1), 143(1), 143(1A), 143(3) and 156; Finance Act, 2001

Reported in : [2009]316ITR306(Ker); 2008(3)KLT326; [2009]176TAXMAN277(Ker)

debatable issue and is ceased to be so only by virtue of Explanation introduced to Section 36(1)(vii) by Finance Act 2001 with effect from 1.4.1989. The contention of counsel for the appellant is that as on date of completion

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 07 2008

Commissioner of Income Central Ii Vs. Suresh N. Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-07-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 4, 4(1), 32, 32(2), 68, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C, 112, 113, 115A, 115AB, 115AC, 115ACA, 115AD, 115B, 115BB, 115BBA, 115E, 115JB, 132, 132A, 132B, 139, 139(1), 142, 142(1), 143, 143(1B), 143(2), 143(3), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 158BA, 158BA(1), 158BA(2), 158BB, 158BB(1), 158BC, 158BH, 161, 161(1A), 164, 164A, 167B, 245D and 245D(4); Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 2(1), 2(2) and 2(3); Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 113; Finance Act, 1995; Constitution of India - Articles 269, 270 and 271

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(SC)274; [2008]297ITR322(SC); JT2008(1)SC208; 2008(1)SCALE99; (2008)4SCC362; 2008AIRSCW1066

appeal.Points for determination:4. Two points arise for determination: Whether on the facts and circumstances of this case, the Finance Act, 2001 ('FA' for short) was applicable to 'block assessment' under Chapter XIV-B in respect of the search carried out … Whether the AO had erred in imposing surcharge at 17% on the tax amount of Rs. 97,456/- under Section 113 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('1961 Act') for the 'block period' comprising of previous years relevant to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 09 2009

Madras Hire Purchase Association Represented by Mr. NitIn Sagan Vs. Un ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-09-2009

Subject : Sales Tax/VATConstitution

Acts : Sale of Goods Act, 1930; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(12), 65(14), 65(105) and 66; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2; Constitution of India (Eighty-eighth) (Amendment) Act, 2003; Constitution of India (Forty-sixth) (Amendment) Act; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 116 and 117; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 137; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 246, 246(1), 265, 268A and 366(29A)

Reported in : (2009)225CTR(Mad)289; (2009)5MLJ1137; [2009]18STJ235(Madras); 2009[16]STR3; (2009)25VST446(Mad)

as may be prescribed.(2) .....(3) .....(4) ......(5) With effect from the date notified under Section 137 of the Finance Act, 2001, there shall be levied a service tax at the rate of five per cent, of the value of … the Honourable Supreme Court has upheld the legislative competence of Parliament to levy service tax under residuary Entry 97 to List I of VII Schedule to the Constitution in the decisions reported in Tamil Nadu Kalyana Mandapam

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 09 2009

Madras Hire Purchase Association Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-09-2009

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance (Amendment) Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 65(12), 65(14), 65(105) and 66; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2; Constitution (Eighty-eighth Amendment) Act, 2003; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 116 and 117; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 137; Sale of Goods Act, 1930; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 246, 246(1), 265, 268A and 366(29A)

Reported in : [2009]21STT355

may be prescribed.(2) to (4)** ** **(5) With effect from the date notified under Section 137 of the Finance Act, 2001, there shall be levied a service tax at the rate of five per cent, of the value of … the Hon'ble Supreme Court has upheld the legislative competence of Parliament to levy service tax under residuary Entry 97 to List I of VIIth Schedule to the Constitution in the decisions in Tamil Nadu Kalyana Mandapam Association

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2011

Union of India and ors. Vs. M/S. Ind-swift Laboratories Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-21-2011

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 32E(1), 32F(7), 32M

the provisions of Sections 11A and 11AB of the Excise Act or Sections 73 and 75 of the Finance Act, shall apply mutatis mutandis for effecting such recoveries."2 16. A bare reading of the said Rule would indicate … parties the Commission came to the findings that while the wrongful CENVAT credit was taken from the year 2001 to 31.03.2006, the payments refunds have been made on 22.02.2006 and on five different dates in March, 2006 … Rs. 5,71,47,148/-. Since conditions/parameters for the admission of a case prescribed under Section 32E(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 [for short "the Act"] were

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 17 2005

Abn Amro Bank Nv Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-17-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)96TTJ(Kol.)1041

contrary view overruling the Tribunal decision considering the Explanation to Section 90(2) of the Act, inserted by the Finance Act, 2001." 39. The relevant facts relating to this issue are that the AO had levied tax in this case … a cheque of Rs. 9,75,58,904 to Andhra Bank for purchase of 17 per cent NPC Bonds @ 'Rs 97 per bond plus accrued interest' and handed over a payment advice and the cheque, cheque forming part of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 18 2004

Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Poddar Projects Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-18-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)92ITD468(Kol.)

of Section 32(2) as amended by Finance (No. 2) Act, 1996 w.e.f. 1.4.97 had been substituted by the Finance Act, 2001 w.e.f. 1.4.02 as under:- "(2)Where, in the assessment of the assessee, full effect cannot be given to any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 2004

Tamil Nadu Kalyana Mandapmam Am Assn. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-15-2004

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 17, 65, 65(19), 65(20), 65(22), 65(23), 65(41), 65(48), 66, 66(1), 67, 68, 85(2), 88 and 93; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rules 2(1) and 6(3); Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 84; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3; Finance Act, 1998; Finance (No.2) Act, 1996 - Sections 85; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 246, 246(1), 246(3) and 366(29A); Constitution of India (46th Amendment) Act - Article 366(29A); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B; Sale of Goods Act, 1930

Reported in : AIR2004SC3757; (2004)4CompLJ108(SC); 2004(3)CTC63; (2004)188CTR(SC)297; 2004(93)ECC353; 2004(167)ELT3(SC); [2004]267ITR9(SC); [2004(4)JCR66(SC)]; JT2004(4)SC568; (2004)3MLJ; (2004) 5 SCC 632

the Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition of the appellant-Association and held Sections 66, 67(o) of the Finance Act, 1994 and Rule 2(1)(d)(ix) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 and other provisions related to Kalyana Mandapmam ams … whereby the Division Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition of the appellant-Association and held Sections 66, 67(o) of the Finance Act, 1994 and Rule 2(1)(d)(ix) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 and other … Tax is legislated by the Parliament under the residuary entry i.e. Entry 97 of List I of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial