Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2001 section 58 · Page 1 of about 1,563 results (0.070 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 26 2014

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-2014

Subject : Service Tax

Special Importance) Act, 1957( 58 of 1957);(v)(v) the National Calamity Contingent duty leviable under section 136 of the Finance Act, 2001 (14 of 2001)(vi)(vi) the Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 91 read with section 93 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2003

Dcit Vs. S.G. Investments and Industries

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Decided on : May-29-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)89ITD44(Kol.)

Act." 9. A new Section 14A in Chapter IV of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 was inserted by the Finance Act, 2001, with retrospective effect from 1-4-1962. The Circular No. 14 of 2001, dated 22-11-2001 issued by the CBDT and … certain deductions in computing the income chargeable under the head "Income from other sources". Heading Section 57 and Section 58 of the Act, it is plain that the expenditure, not in the nature of capital expenditure and personal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2010

Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Respondent) Vs. D ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Decided on : Dec-15-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

section 730A.) It should also be mentioned in passing that section 736A, introducing Schedule 23A, was enacted by section 58 of the Finance Act 1991. I draw attention to the different provenance of these provisions because it is … as borrower deemed to exist under section 737A(5) of ICTA 1988 and section 97(2) and (4) of the Finance Act 1996 ("FA 1996"). 2. Counsel on both sides put this analysis in the forefront of their written cases. … six years about DCC's tax return for the relevant period (1 April 2001 to 31 March 2002), and they are now extremely familiar with the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 15 2005

Wallfort Shares and Stock Brokers Vs. Ito

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-15-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)96ITD1(Mum.)

by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1991 with retrospective effect from 1-4-1972; insertion of section 14-A by the Finance Act, 2001 with retrospective effect from 1-4-1962; Explanation to section 36(1)(viii) by Finance Act, 1992 with retrospective effect from 1-4-1987 … The learned CIT(Appeals) referred to the judgment of House of Lords in the case of Griffiths v.J.P. Harrison, 58 ITR 328 (P.C) In that case the assessee purchased shares of a company. That company had at that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 2015

M/S Wipro Limited Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-25-2015

Subject : Direct Taxation

not form part of total income”. It may be noted that when section 10A was recast by the Finance Act, 2001, Parliament was aware of the character of relief given in Chapter III. Chapter III deals with - 66 … the income chargeable to income tax under Sections 4 and 5 of the Act. Therefore, when an - 58 - assessee is having several undertakings, one of which falls under Section 10A, the assessee’s entire income from

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2010

M/S.Malaysian Airlines. M/S.Saudi Arabian Airlines. and ors Vs. the Un ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-09-2010

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are challenging imposition of penalty under section 38(3) of the Finance Act, 1979 ("Finance Act" or "Act" for short) for delay in payment of Foreign Travel Tax ("FTT" for short) … 1979 framed thereunder ("FTT Rules" for short). The petitioner for the months of April, August, September and December, 2001 failed to pay the FTT within the stipulated period. In view of its failure, four separate showcause notices … case of Iran National Airlines v. Union of India, 2006 (202) ELT 588 (Bom.) followed in North West Airlines v. Union of India, 2007 (214)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 2008

Fleming (T/a Bodycraft) (Respondent) Vs. Her Majestyand#8217;s Revenue ...

Court : House of Lords

Decided on : Jan-23-2008

Subject : Land Acquisition

time limit. 3. An amendment to section 80(4) of VATA 1994 was enacted by section 47 of the Finance Act 1997 with effect from 18 July 1996. It reduced the six year time limit for the recovery of … appeals. 33. In order to illustrate how the problem was perceived in 2001, and at the risk of excessive raking through ashes that are now … been suggested that it was not within the Commissioners’ general powers of care and management of VAT under section 58 of and Schedule 11 to VATA 1994. 41. The “transitional regime” announced by the Commissioners was a period

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 14 2007

The Dcit Vs. Tata Investment Corporation Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : May-14-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

separately and the heads of income are as under: Section 14A of the I.T.Act was inserted by the Finance Act, 2001 with retrospective effect from 01.04.1962, which provided as under: Section 14A - For the purpose of computing the … as per P &L A/c. 710.50 Add: Depreciation admissible 30.73 741.23 Less: Depreciation as per P & LA/c. 58.93 Donations 29.11 Payment under Section 40A(9) 0.05 Long term diminution in value of Inv. 379.47 Amount under Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 2005

Shaw Wallace and Co. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-19-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)101TTJ(Kol.)258

by the Bench of the Tribunal in para 15 at p. 10 applying the retrospective amendment by the Finance Act, 2001 to Section 36(1)(vii), when amended section has not been made available to the assessee at the time of … on the decision of Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench in case of Dr. Vijay Kumar Datla v. Asstt. CIT (1996) 58 ITD 339 (Hyd) at p. 364, para 17, Tribunal Delhi (Special Bench) decision in case of Motorola Inc.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 2006

Surbhi Industries Vs. Commissioner of Customs and

Court : Authority for Advance Rulings

Decided on : Dec-05-2006

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2007)(208)ELT578AAR

(levied under First Schedule to the Tariff Act), National Calamity Contingent Duty (NCCD) @ 23% (levied under the Finance Act, 2001), Additional Duty (AED) @ 5.5% (levied under Finance Act, 2005) and Education Cess (EC) @ 2% of aggregate … 1. In this application under Section 23C of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short "the CE Act"), the applicant, M/s Surbhi Industries, a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial