Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Balika Finance Co. Ltd.
Chennai
Feb-26-2007
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act - Sections 32A, 36, 36(1), 37, 37(3), 56, 57, 80AA, 80M and 80M(1); Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 14A
(2008)215CTR(Mad)255; [2008]299ITR421(Mad)
as income from other sources. She further pointed out that the amendment introduced under Section 14-A of the Finance Act, 2001, is retrospective from 1.4.1962; hence no deduction could be allowed in respect of the expenditure referable to the … the provisions of the Act. The computation as regards dividend income is to be made in accordance with Section 56 and 57.20. Under similar circumstances, the Bombay High Court, in the decision reported in 236 ITR 456 C.I.T.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWallfort Shares and Stock Brokers Vs. Ito
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Jul-15-2005
Land Acquisition
(2005)96ITD1(Mum.)
by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1991 with retrospective effect from 1-4-1972; insertion of section 14-A by the Finance Act, 2001 with retrospective effect from 1-4-1962; Explanation to section 36(1)(viii) by Finance Act, 1992 with retrospective effect from 1-4-1987 … Section 10(23D) also employed expression "income of mutual fund". The learned special counsel argued that the provisions of section 56(2)(i) would not, therefore, apply to an income received from a mutual fund in relation to any units of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSouth Indian Bank Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Income Tax
Kerala
May-28-2008
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act - Sections 28, 36(1), 139, 142(1), 143(1), 143(1A), 143(3) and 156; Finance Act, 2001
[2009]316ITR306(Ker); 2008(3)KLT326; [2009]176TAXMAN277(Ker)
debatable issue and is ceased to be so only by virtue of Explanation introduced to Section 36(1)(vii) by Finance Act 2001 with effect from 1.4.1989. The contention of counsel for the appellant is that as on date of completion
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Plastiblends India Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Ac ...
Mumbai
Dec-19-2008
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 29 to 43A, 72, 80A, 80AA, 80AB, 80B(5), 80E, 80HH, 80HH(6), 80HH(7), 80I, 80IA, 80IA(5), 80IA(8), 80IA(10), 80IB, 80IB(13), 143(1), 143(3), 147 and 260A; Companies Act, 1956; Taxation Laws (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1986 - Sections 34(1); Finance (No. 2) Act, 1980; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 5
(2009)223CTR(Bom)291; [2009]178TAXMAN397(Bom)
the Act which continued till the assessment year 2002-2003, when explanation to Section 5 was inserted by the Finance Act 2001 with effect from 1.4.2002 and, therefore, the Tribunal erred in holding that omission of Section 34(1) by Taxation … for the Appellant urged that the Supreme Court had categorically held in CIT v. Mahendra Mills 243 ITR 56 that the assessee had an option to disclaim deduction in respect of the depreciation while computing its income
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Nath Jindal Vs. Cit
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-19-2001
Direct Taxation
(2001)170CTR(P& H)251
Matched in: Citation (2001)170CTR(P& H)251
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBangalore Turf Club Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Karnataka
Sep-26-2014
Direct Taxation
is made clear by Section 74A(3). 7.4 He would contend that the change that was brought about by Finance Act, 2001 was to introduce tax deduction at source on winnings from 'card game and other game of any sort'. … cannot be brought within this definition clause. 5.1. He would also draw the attention of the Court to Section 56 of the Act that income enumerated under Section 2(24)(ix) is chargeable to tax in terms of Section 56(2)(ib)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBangalore Turf Club Limited Vs. Union of India
Karnataka
Sep-26-2014
Education
is made clear by Section 74A(3). 7.4. He would contend that the change that was brought about by Finance Act, 2001 was to introduce 32 tax deduction at source on winnings from ‘card game and other game of any … be brought within this definition clause. 15 5.1. He would also draw the attention of the Court to Section 56 of the Act that income enumerated under Section 2(24)(ix) is chargeable to tax in terms of Section 56(2)(ib)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunash Investment Co. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Dec-08-2006
Direct Taxation
(2007)106TTJ(Mum.)855
the object of introduction of Section 14A with the submission that Section 14A has been inserted by the Finance Act, 2001 with retrospective effect from the 1st day of April, 1962 to nullify the decision of the Supreme Court … shares were acquired by the assessee in earlier year when-dividend was taxable under the head 'Other sources' under Section 56 and interest paid by the assessee has been claimed and allowed in earlier years as having been incurred
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhagwatilal G. Shah Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Gujarat
Feb-23-2005
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 5(1), 10, 14, 15, 17(1), 17(3), 17(3)(1), 56, 57, 80R and 256(1); Finance Act, 2001
(2005)196CTR(Guj)8; [2005]277ITR277(Guj)
invited attention to the amendment brought on the statute book with effect from 1st April 2002 by the Finance Act, 2001, whereunder Clause (iii) came to be inserted in Section 17(3) of the Act, to contend that, till 31st … disallowed.11. The amount of Rs.15,000/- has been brought to tax under the head 'income from other sources' under Section 56 of the Act. In the circumstances, whether the amount of Rs.7,500/- can be allowed as a deduction is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWallfort Shares and Stock Brokers Vs. Income-tax Officer [Alongwith
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Jul-15-2005
Land Acquisition
by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1991 with retrospective effect from 1.4.1972; insertion of Section 14-A by the Finance Act, 2001 with retrospective effect from 1.4.1962; Explanation to Section 36(1)(viii) by Finance Act, 1992 with retrospective effect from 1.4.1987 … Section 10(23D) also employed expression "income of mutual fund". The learned special counsel argued that the provisions of Section 56(2)(i) would not, therefore, apply to an income received from a mutual fund in relation to any units of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »