Advanced Search Results

Mukesh Kumar and Others Vs. The Debts Recovery Tribunal rep., by its R ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

bind the parties in a subsequent litigation. (Barkat Ali Vs. Badrinarain (AIR 2001 Rajasthan 51). Issues which have been concluded inter-parties cannot be raised again … authority; (iii) a statutory body; (iv) an instrumentality or agency of the State; (v) a company which is financed and owned by the State; (vi) a private body run substantially on State funding; (vii) a private body … petitioners herein, under Section 17 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short the SARFAESI Act ?), to set aside the proceedings initiated by the 2nd respondent-bank herein,

National Dairy Development Board Vs. Additional Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)114TTJ(Ahd.)145

and function of carrying on developmental activities in the areas as specified in the said Acts. By the Finance Act, 2001 and Finance Act, 2002, tax exemption of certain bodies set up through an Act of Parliament was withdrawn. … 10A(6) providing for the deemed allowance of depreciation for the assessment years ending before 1st day of April, 2001. Section 10B(6) also provides for similar deemed allowance of depreciation for any of the relevant assessment years ending before … Co.Ltd. v. ITO (1983) 15 TTJ (Ahd) 403 : (1982) 2 ITD 51 (And)--Ed.].Expenditure/utilization from the project funds has not been claimed as an expenditure

Dharmpal Satyapal Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 9, 11, 11A and 35F; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 154 and 154(3); Finance Act, 1982 - Sections 51; Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 - Sections 39 and 39(5); Small Causes Courts Act - Sections 17; Court-fees Act - Sections 6; Customs Act; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1), 9 and 49; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 226

person chargeable with the duty. Referring to paragraph 31 of the judgment, he submitted that the provisions of Section 51 of the Finance Act, 1982 by which retrospective effect to the amendments of Rules 9 and 49 of … 8.7.1999..The Union of India preferred SLP (c) No. 4131-34/2003 against the judgment in writ appeal.14.5.2003 : By the Finance Act, 2003, the benefit of Notification No. 32/1999 dated 8.7.1999, withdrawn from its inception viz. from 8.7.1999 to 28.2.2001

Tonira Pharma Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

of introduction of Sub-section (2A) in Section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act. JA.1 Section 118 of the Finance Act, 2001 introduced Sub-section (2A) to Section 9A in Customs Tariff Act, 1975 which is reproduced below: (2A) Notwithstanding anything … Register is not intended to record the charging of raw materials. Daily Shift Register (refer page 509-518 & 519-524 of Vol. III) is not intended to record charging of raw material. It is a document merely to

B.V. Nafan and Others Vs. SAF Yeast Company Pvt. Ltd. and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

records, such as minutes of shareholders' meetings etc. (ix) Muthu, as the Managing Director, earlier used to provide finance statement and monthly information statements to Nafan through Lesaffre. However, for the financial year 2005-06 Nafan did not … on certain conditions with the Calyon Bank by letter dated 2 March 2001. It was suggested that the offences were non-compoundable and Court at Hardoi … Lasaffre Et Cie, to transfer 80722 shares i.e. 51% of shareholding to the respondents in that petition, … of 2009 was filed by Nafan under Sections 111, 235, 237, 397, 398, 402 and 403 of Companies Act, 1956 (the Act), briefly on the following averments: (i) Lesaffre is one of the leading company in the … Nafan 7. Company Petition No.62 of 2009 was filed by Nafan under Sections 111, 235, 237, 397, 398, 402 and 403 of Companies Act, 1956

Bangalore Turf Club Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

is made clear by Section 74A(3). 7.4. He would contend that the change that was brought about by Finance Act, 2001 was to introduce 32 tax deduction at source on winnings from ‘card game and other game of any … G10 to G19 respectively.14. Since maintainability of these writ petitions have been challenged, it would be appropriate to 51 adjudicate the same as preliminary point and thereafter proceed to examine the writ petitions on merits, if required.

Commissioner of Income Tax 5 Mumbai Vs. M/S. Essar Teleholdings Ltd. T ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

be understood before correctly appreciating the nature and purport of Rule 8D. Section 14A was first inserted by Finance Act, 2001 with retrospective effect w.e.f. 01.04.1962. Section 14A as originally inserted reads as under:­ “14A. Expenditure incurred in relation … RESPONDENT(S) WITH C.A.No.1429 of 2018 @ SLP(C) No. 36560 of 2012, C.A. No. 117 of 2015, C.A. No. 5101 of 2012, C.A. No. 118 of 2015, C.A. No. 6727 of 2015, C.A. No. 119 of 2015, C.A.

Bangalore Turf Club Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

is made clear by Section 74A(3). 7.4 He would contend that the change that was brought about by Finance Act, 2001 was to introduce tax deduction at source on winnings from 'card game and other game of any sort'. … person employed in the execution of the Act even if they deviate from the provisions of the Act.' 51. In fact, the very same circular No.240 dated 17.05.1978 came up for consideration before the Division Bench of

Abn Amro Bank Nv Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)96TTJ(Kol.)1041

contrary view overruling the Tribunal decision considering the Explanation to Section 90(2) of the Act, inserted by the Finance Act, 2001." 39. The relevant facts relating to this issue are that the AO had levied tax in this case

Madras Refineries Ltd., Chennai Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)(100)ECC317

amended by Notification No. 20/82-CE dated 20.2.1982 (to which retrospective effect was given by Section 51 of the Finance Act of 1982), duty of excise was leviable on goods manufactured and captively consumed. These provisions were applicable to