Advanced Search Results

Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Appellant) Vs. To ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

took effect, for income tax and capital gains tax purposes, in 1996-97. Further amendments were made by the Finance Act 2001 ("FA 2001") intended to simplify and clarify the process of self-assessment. A limited liability partnership established under the … (the first two introduced by FA 1994, the last four substituted by FA 2001). The familiar provisions of section 50 of TMA 1970, relating to procedure before the Commissioners (now the First-tier Tribunal) were also amended by those

Tata Sky Limited Vs. the State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; ; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 4; ; Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1979 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4A, 4A(4), 4B and 4C; ; Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax (Amendment) Act, 2009; ; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 65(5), 65(13), 65(63), 65(72) and 137; ; Prasar Bharti (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990 - Section 2; ; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 65, 66(5), 65(14), 65(15), 65(80) and 65(90); ; Finance Act, 2003 - Section 65, 65(16), 65(95), 65(105) and 66(1); ; Finance Act, 2004; ; Finance Act, 2005 - Section 65(16) and 65(105); ; Government of India Act, 1935; ; Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995; ; Bengal Amusements Tax Act, 1922; ; We

the fact, that broadcasting was subjected to tax liability as a 'service' for the first time under the Finance Act, 2001. Chapter V. of the Finance Act, 2001 bears the heading 'Service Tax'. Section 65(13) of the Finance Act, … be paid before the 7th day of the month.(b) The FRANCHISEE will keep an interest-free deposit of Rs. 50/- per subscriber with the NETWORK.(c) The price mentioned in (a) above is liable to change depending upon the

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Special Importance) Act, 1957( 58 of 1957);(v)(v) the National Calamity Contingent duty leviable under section 136 of the Finance Act, 2001 (14 of 2001)(vi)(vi) the Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 91 read with section 93 of … and Sons, (1981(47) STC 318) 49. Mehra Brothers Vs. Joint Commercial Officer, Madras, (1991)1 Supreme Court Cases 514) 50. Banco Products (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex., Vadodara-I, (2009(235) ELT 636 (Tri-LB)) 51. Commr. Of C.

State of Kerala and ors. Vs. Maharashtra Distilleries Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Kerala Abkari Act - Sections 6, 7, 11, 12, 14, 17, 18, 18A, 21 and 29; Kerala Abkari Rules; Kerala Sales Tax Act; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 2, 5, 5(1), 5(2C) and 35; Kerala Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 3A; Kerala Distillery and Warehouse Rules, 1968 - Rules 16(1), 47, 50 and 52; Foreign Liquor Storage in Bond Rules, 1961 - Rules 3, 3(1), 11 and 11(1); Foreign Liquor Rules, 1953 - Rules 3, 13(9) and 14; Cochin Abkari Act - Sections 10, 14, 24, 29 and 29(2); Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposal in Auction) Rules, 1974 - Rule 3(1A); Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; Finance Act, 2001; Constitution of India - Articles 301, 304, 304(1) and 311; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 20; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR2005SC2594; JT2005(5)SC427; (2005)11SCC1; [2005]141STC358(SC)

validity of Section 5(2C) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act read with Section 3A of the Kerala Finance Act 2001 as being unconstitutional, both in its retrospective and prospective operation. They also challenged the consequent actions initiated against … or taxes as may be prescribed by the Government, after denaturation under the rules prescribed under the Act.'Rule 50 deals with removal under Bond and reads as follows :-'50. Removals under bond. - When spirits are removed

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Manoharsinhji P. Jadeja

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(14), 2(47), 2(22A), 2(42A), 45, 48, 49, 49(1), 50, 55, 55(2), 55(3) and 256(2); Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act - Sections 40(4); Finance Act, 1987; Finance Act, 1997; Finance Act, 2001

Reported in : (2005)199CTR(Guj)223; (2005)3GLR2218; [2006]281ITR19(Guj)

Finance Act 1997 with effect from 1st April 1998; trademark or brand name associated with business by the Finance Act 2001 with effect from 1st April 2002; and right to carry on any business by the Finance Act 2002 … other provisions which indicate that Section 48 is concerned with an asset capable of acquisition at a cost. Section 50 is one such provision. So also is Sub-section (2) of Section 55. None of the provisions pertaining to

Merit Enterprises Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)288ITR226(Hyd.)

be anomalous for the following reasons: a) Finance Act contains the proposals for the following financial year e.g. Finance Act, 2001 contains the proposals for the Finance year 2001-02. The rates of taxation are further provided in the First … levy of surcharge in a block assessment is at pages 49 and 50. The conference proposed amendment of Section 113 of the Income-tax Act, which … reference arises out of the appeal, against the assessment order passed by the DCIT, Central Circle-I, Hyderabad under Section 158BC of the Income-tax Act for the block period from 1.4.1989 to 18.11.1999, dated Nil, stated in the

G.T.C. Industries Ltd. Vs. the Dy. Cit, Spl. Rg. 50

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Matched in: Parties G.T.C. Industries Ltd. Vs. the Dy. Cit, Spl. Rg. 50

Gtc Industries Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)104ITD86(Mum.)

provisions of bad and doubtful debts but it is pertinent to note that this Explanation (inserted by the Finance Act, 2001 though with retrospective effect from 1-4-1989. Thus, it is evident that this Explanation is not available for the … sum of Rs. 10,99,552 being provision for bad and doubtful debts claimed by the assessee and allowed under Section 143(3) proceedings by the Assessing Officer, by invoking the powers under Section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.3.

Colorway Photo Lab Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : 2009[15]STR17; [2009]22STT123; (2009)25VST97(MP)

Cost of the petition.2. The submission of the petition in nutshell is that provisions of Section 67 of Finance Act, 2001 be declared ultra vires the Constitution, void and inoperative. According to the petitioner the circular dated 9-7-2001 issued

Commissioner Vs. B.C. Kataria, General Manager, Dhillon Kool Drinks an ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 2008(221)ELT508(P& H)

back cases to the adjudicating authority consequent to the specific amendment in this regard carried out by the Finance Act, 2001 w.e.f. 11.5.201.2. After hearing learned Counsel for the parties, perusing the Order-in-Original dated 23.3.2004, passed by the Adjudicating … shall dispose of C.E.A. Nos. 11 and 12 of 2006, which have been filed by the revenue under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for brevity, 'the Act'), against the orders dated 14.3.2005 and 10.3.2005