Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Income Central Ii Vs. Suresh N. Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 4, 4(1), 32, 32(2), 68, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C, 112, 113, 115A, 115AB, 115AC, 115ACA, 115AD, 115B, 115BB, 115BBA, 115E, 115JB, 132, 132A, 132B, 139, 139(1), 142, 142(1), 143, 143(1B), 143(2), 143(3), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 158BA, 158BA(1), 158BA(2), 158BB, 158BB(1), 158BC, 158BH, 161, 161(1A), 164, 164A, 167B, 245D and 245D(4); Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 2(1), 2(2) and 2(3); Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 113; Finance Act, 1995; Constitution of India - Articles 269, 270 and 271

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(SC)274; [2008]297ITR322(SC); JT2008(1)SC208; 2008(1)SCALE99; (2008)4SCC362; 2008AIRSCW1066

appeal.Points for determination:4. Two points arise for determination: Whether on the facts and circumstances of this case, the Finance Act, 2001 ('FA' for short) was applicable to 'block assessment' under Chapter XIV-B in respect of the search carried out … Whether the AO had erred in imposing surcharge at 17% on the tax amount of Rs. 97,456/- under Section 113 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('1961 Act') for the 'block period' comprising of previous years relevant to … anything contained in any other provisions of this Act where after the 30th day of June, 1995 a search is initiated under Section 132 or

National Federation of Insurance Field Workers of India and anr. Vs. U ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 14, 15, 16, 17, 17(1), 17(2), 192(2C), 295, 295(2), 296 and 296(1); Finance Act - Sections 17(2); Income Tax (Amendment) Rules, 2001 - Rule 3

Reported in : (2004)187CTR(Uttranchal)180; [2004]265ITR84(Uttaranchal)

authority, to identify 'interest free loan/concessional loan' as a fringe benefit under Section 17(2)(vi) (as inserted by the Finance Act, 2001) with effect from April 1, 2002. In this connection, it was further argued that under Section 17(2)(vi) the … any guidelines. The third ground of attack to the impugned notification is that by the impugned notification, Rule 3 of the existing Income-tax Rules has been substituted. That a new rule has been inserted. That the impugned

State of Kerala and ors. Vs. Maharashtra Distilleries Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Kerala Abkari Act - Sections 6, 7, 11, 12, 14, 17, 18, 18A, 21 and 29; Kerala Abkari Rules; Kerala Sales Tax Act; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 2, 5, 5(1), 5(2C) and 35; Kerala Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 3A; Kerala Distillery and Warehouse Rules, 1968 - Rules 16(1), 47, 50 and 52; Foreign Liquor Storage in Bond Rules, 1961 - Rules 3, 3(1), 11 and 11(1); Foreign Liquor Rules, 1953 - Rules 3, 13(9) and 14; Cochin Abkari Act - Sections 10, 14, 24, 29 and 29(2); Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposal in Auction) Rules, 1974 - Rule 3(1A); Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; Finance Act, 2001; Constitution of India - Articles 301, 304, 304(1) and 311; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 20; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR2005SC2594; JT2005(5)SC427; (2005)11SCC1; [2005]141STC358(SC)

validity of Section 5(2C) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act read with Section 3A of the Kerala Finance Act 2001 as being unconstitutional, both in its retrospective and prospective operation. They also challenged the consequent actions initiated against … Full Court in Re : The bill to amend Section 20 of the Sea Customs Act, 1878 and Section 3 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 : 1963 (3) SCR 787 in which the law was

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-i Vs. Joint Secretary(Revisionar ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Excise

Articles) Act, 1978 (40 of 1978); (d) the National Calamity Contingent duty leviable under section 136 of the Finance Act, 2001 (14 of 2001), as amended by Section 169 of the Finance Act, 2003 (32 of 2003) and further … on the inputs. 3. CVD is imposed when import is made under the Customs Act, 1962 read with Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 4. Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 reads as under:

P.N. Tiwari and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14; Finance Act, 2001; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 17(2), 295 and 296; Income Tax Rule, 1962 - Rule 3

Reported in : (2003)185CTR(All)1; [2004]265ITR224(All)

petitioner is also challenging the validity of Section 17(2)(vi) of the IT Act, 1961, as inserted by the Finance Act, 2001 on the ground that it has delegated essential legislative powers and that it is violative of Articles 19(1) … is challenging the validity of Notification dt. 25th Sept., 2001 (Annex.-1 to the writ petition), by which Rule 3 of the IT Rules, 1962, was substituted by the Income-tax (22nd Amendment) Rules, 2001 issued by the CBDT.

Maruti Suzuki Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-iii

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 - Rules 2, 3(1), 6, 6(1) and 14; Additional Duties of Excise (Textile and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4 and 4(2); Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 66 and 136; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 157; Customs Tariff Act - Sections 3; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 - Sections 91, 93, 95; Central Excise Rules, 2000 - Rules 3(1), 7, 9 and 16(2); CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004

Reported in : 2009(168)LC87(SC); 2009(240)ELT641(SC); JT2009(11)SC8; 2009(11)SCALE446; (2009)9SCC193; [2009]18STJ323(SC); [2009]22STT54; 2009(7)LC3257(SC)

Importance) Act, 1957 ( 58 of 1957);v. the National Calamity Contingent duty leviable under Section 136 of the Finance Act, 2001 (14 of 2001), as amended by Clause 161 of the Finance Bill, 2003, which clause has, by virtue … the Second Schedule to the Tariff Act, leviable under the Act;iii. the additional duty of excise leviable under Section 3 of the Additional Duties of Excise (Textile and Textile Articles) Act,1978 ( 40 of 1978);iv. the additional duty

Commissioner of Income Tax 5 Mumbai Vs. M/S. Essar Teleholdings Ltd. T ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

be understood before correctly appreciating the nature and purport of Rule 8D. Section 14A was first inserted by Finance Act, 2001 with retrospective effect w.e.f. 01.04.1962. Section 14A as originally inserted reads as under:­ “14A. Expenditure incurred in relation … APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M/S. ESSAR TELEHOLDINGS LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGER … RESPONDENT(S) WITH C.A.No.1429 of 2018 @ SLP(C) No. 36560 of 2012, C.A. No. 117 of 2015, C.A. No. 5101 of 2012, C.A. No. 118 of 2015, C.A.

Dabur India Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(45), 5, 6, 9, 14, 28, 29, 30 to 43D, 59, 71, 72(1), 72(2), 73(3), 80A, 80A(1), 80AB, 80B, 80B(5), 80C to 80U, 80IB, 80HHC, 143(1), 143(2) and 260A; Taxation Laws (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act; Finance Act, 2001; Finance Act, 1988

Reported in : 219(2008)DLT152

decide in Vahid Papers Converters (supra) was, whether Explanation 5 to Section 32 of the Act inserted by Finance Act, 2001 was clarificatory in nature and hence, would apply to earlier years as well. The ITAT considered it unnecessary … respect of the total income of the previous year of every person. 'Previous year' has been defined under Section 3 of the Act to mean any financial year which immediately precedes the assessment year. The expression 'total income'

South Indian Bank Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Kerala

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act - Sections 28, 36(1), 139, 142(1), 143(1), 143(1A), 143(3) and 156; Finance Act, 2001

Reported in : [2009]316ITR306(Ker); 2008(3)KLT326; [2009]176TAXMAN277(Ker)

debatable issue and is ceased to be so only by virtue of Explanation introduced to Section 36(1)(vii) by Finance Act 2001 with effect from 1.4.1989. The contention of counsel for the appellant is that as on date of completion … Act and in the proceedings so issued, the Assessing Officer among other things made an addition of Rs. 3,04,22,000/- representing provision towards bad debt. Even though assessee filed rectification application for deletion of the addition and consequential

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Medico Labs and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35A(3); Finance Act, 2001

Reported in : (2004)192CTR(Guj)112; 2004(173)ELT117(Guj)

the power of remand even after the amendment of Section 35A(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, by Finance Act, 2001 ?(ii) Whether a single Member Bench can overrule a decision of the larger Bench on the same issue