Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Income Tax 5 Mumbai Vs. M/S. Essar Teleholdings Ltd. T ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

be understood before correctly appreciating the nature and purport of Rule 8D. Section 14A was first inserted by Finance Act, 2001 with retrospective effect w.e.f. 01.04.1962. Section 14A as originally inserted reads as under:­ “14A. Expenditure incurred in relation … Rs.69,92,67,527/­. A notice under Section 143(2) was issued to the assessee. The Assessing Officer vide its order dated 27.03.2006 held that during the year under consideration, the assessee company was in receipt of both taxable and non­taxable

Bajaj Auto Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

to aforesaid.8. Now turning to the three cesses in question, NCCD was imposed under Section 136 of the Finance Act, 2001, in the nature of a duty of excise, in 4 addition to any other duties of excise chargeable … & Higher Education Cess were not being paid. The dispute arose on account of an audit conducted on 27/28.2.2009. The dispute pertains to the liability of the appellant to pay the unpaid three cesses referred to aforesaid.8.

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkha ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(19), 37(1), 40A(2), 80P and 260A; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 2(4), 65, 78 and 79A; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3(3); Co-operative Societies Act, 1912; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 2(18), 2(24), 27(111). 36(1), 40, 45(3), 80L(1), 80P, 139(1), 193, 194A(3), 269T and 269

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(Bom)662; [2008]301ITR191(Bom)

27(111). 36(1)(ia), 40(ba), 45(3), 80L(1)(ii), (vi), (via), (viii), (ix), 80P, Expln. 1 (b)(1) to Section 139 (1)(prior to Finance Act, 2001), 193 (iib), 194A(3)(i), (v), 269T and 269 (VA). In these circumstances, it was held that under the IT

Maharashtra State Electricity Board Vs. Maharashtra Electricity Regula ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 17(5), 27 and 29; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 45, 49 and 59

Reported in : AIR2004Bom294; 2004(3)BomCR485

the tariff for electrical power for the year 2000-2001. On 15th March, 2001, the Board submitted a proposal seeking revision of retail distribution tariff with … tariff. The reasoned order was pronounced on 10th January, 2002 which is impugned in this Appeal filed under Section 27 of the ERC Act.2. We would first consider the points arising in Appeal No. 4 of 2002 and … and the tariffs should have been so approved that there would be no recovered revenue gap in the finances of the Board. In our opinion, there can be no doubt that the affairs of Electricity Board are

Itc Ltd Vs. Cce, Kolkata Iv

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

the ‘assessment’ as prevailed under the 1962 Act and the amended definition under the Act, assessment w.e.f. 8.4.2011, Finance Act, 2011, Section 17 and Section 27 as amended by the Finance Act, 2011. It was urged by learned … to the specified quantitative limit manufactured from unconventional raw materials. Upon receipt of a letter dated March 30, 2001 from the 6 Superintendent of Central Excise, the Appellant examined the matter and realized the mistake committed by

Additional Commissioner of Vs. Hughes Services (Far East) (P.)

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)87ITD137(Delhi)

contending that off-period salary is taxable in view of the provisions of Explanationto Section 9(1)(ii) as substituted by Finance Act, 1999 which, according to him, is retrospective in operation, being clarificatory/declaratory in nature. It was emphasized by him … learned DR does not help the revenue. In that case the Apex Court ruled that the amendment of Section 27 by insertion of Clause (iii) simply declared the meaning of the word "owner" which was always there even

Merit Enterprises Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)288ITR226(Hyd.)

be anomalous for the following reasons: a) Finance Act contains the proposals for the following financial year e.g. Finance Act, 2001 contains the proposals for the Finance year 2001-02. The rates of taxation are further provided in the First … reference arises out of the appeal, against the assessment order passed by the DCIT, Central Circle-I, Hyderabad under Section 158BC of the Income-tax Act for the block period from 1.4.1989 to 18.11.1999, dated Nil, stated in the … the brief facts of the case by the assessee as completed on 27.4.2001, filed with the Tribunal on 13.12.2001, challenging the levy of surcharge of

Ghodawat Pan Masala Products (i) Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtr ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 301; Maharashtra Tax on Luxuries Act, 1987 - Sections 2(2), 3A, 3B and 3B(2); Maharashtra Tax Laws (Lavy and amendment) Act 2001; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956;

Reported in : 2002(6)BomCR466; [2003]130STC310(Bom)

Matched in: Advocate G.S. Jetly, Senior Counsel and ;P.S. Jetly, Adv. i/b., ;A.S. Tungare, Adv. for the petitioners in W.P. Nos. 2748 and 5357 of 2001; ;S.G. Aney, Senior Counsel and ;V.B. Naik, Adv. i/b., Dipti Kale, A A.J. Rana and ;N.A. Deshpande, A.G.P.

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 (w.e.f. 01.04.2009) 27. Section 2(15) - which had been amended last, in 198324, was again … The judgment in Surat Art Silk .................................................................................................................. 11 D. Relevant changes brought about to the IT Act, 1961 (Finance Act, 1983 and 1991) ............................... 17 E. The judgment in Thanthi Trust .................................................................................................................. 18 F. Deletion of certain exemptions: … 1983 and 1991) ............................... 17 E. The judgment in Thanthi Trust .................................................................................................................. 18 F. Deletion of certain exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008

New United Construction Company Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 271(1)

Reported in : (2004)190CTR(Jharkhand)116; [2004]270ITR214(Jharkhand); [2004(2)JCR116(Jhr)]

is direct while the latter may be indirect in its execution.A conspectus of the Explanation added by the Finance Act, 1964 and the subsequent substituted Explanations makes it clear that the statue visualized the assessment proceedings and penalty … P.K. Balasubramanyan, CJ.1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna, has referred the following question to this Court under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act:'Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the imposition … in the circumstances of the case, the imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act amounting to Rs. 2.20.000/- was legal and