Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2001 section 18 · Page 1 of about 6,823 results (0.143 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 06 2005

State of Kerala and ors. Vs. Maharashtra Distilleries Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-06-2005

Subject : Excise

Acts : Kerala Abkari Act - Sections 6, 7, 11, 12, 14, 17, 18, 18A, 21 and 29; Kerala Abkari Rules; Kerala Sales Tax Act; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 2, 5, 5(1), 5(2C) and 35; Kerala Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 3A; Kerala Distillery and Warehouse Rules, 1968 - Rules 16(1), 47, 50 and 52; Foreign Liquor Storage in Bond Rules, 1961 - Rules 3, 3(1), 11 and 11(1); Foreign Liquor Rules, 1953 - Rules 3, 13(9) and 14; Cochin Abkari Act - Sections 10, 14, 24, 29 and 29(2); Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposal in Auction) Rules, 1974 - Rule 3(1A); Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; Finance Act, 2001; Constitution of India - Articles 301, 304, 304(1) and 311; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 20; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR2005SC2594; JT2005(5)SC427; (2005)11SCC1; [2005]141STC358(SC)

validity of Section 5(2C) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act read with Section 3A of the Kerala Finance Act 2001 as being unconstitutional, both in its retrospective and prospective operation. They also challenged the consequent actions initiated against … for the manufacture of potable liquor meant for human consumption.Explanation :- For the purpose of this section and Section 18, the expression 'duty of excise', with reference to liquor or intoxicating drugs, include countervailing duty on such goods

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2004

B.L. Srinivasa Gowda (Huf) and anr. Vs. the Asst. Commissioner of Agri ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-25-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 18(3-A)

Reported in : ILR2004KAR2608; [2004]270ITR332(KAR); [2004]270ITR332(Karn)

be regarded as a regular assessment for the purpose of this Section.Explanation 4 : (1) Omitted by the Finance Act, 2001, w.r.e.f. 1.4.1989. Prior to its omission, Explanation 4, as inserted by the Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1989, … on noticing that there was a delay in filing the return of income, proposed levy of interest under Section 18(3-A) of the Act. After affording an opportunity to the assessee, by his order dated 31-1-2002 levied a sum

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 2007

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkha ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-14-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(19), 37(1), 40A(2), 80P and 260A; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 2(4), 65, 78 and 79A; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3(3); Co-operative Societies Act, 1912; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 2(18), 2(24), 27(111). 36(1), 40, 45(3), 80L(1), 80P, 139(1), 193, 194A(3), 269T and 269

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(Bom)662; [2008]301ITR191(Bom)

27(111). 36(1)(ia), 40(ba), 45(3), 80L(1)(ii), (vi), (via), (viii), (ix), 80P, Expln. 1 (b)(1) to Section 139 (1)(prior to Finance Act, 2001), 193 (iib), 194A(3)(i), (v), 269T and 269 (VA). In these circumstances, it was held that under the IT

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 26 2006

Merit Enterprises Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Apr-26-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)288ITR226(Hyd.)

be anomalous for the following reasons: a) Finance Act contains the proposals for the following financial year e.g. Finance Act, 2001 contains the proposals for the Finance year 2001-02. The rates of taxation are further provided in the First … reference arises out of the appeal, against the assessment order passed by the DCIT, Central Circle-I, Hyderabad under Section 158BC of the Income-tax Act for the block period from 1.4.1989 to 18.11.1999, dated Nil, stated in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 2025

State of Kerala & Another versus Asianet Satellite Communications ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-22-2025

Reported in : [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2215

Bharti (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990 - Section 2(c) - Finance Act, 1994 as amended by the Finance Act, 2001 - Section 65(13). [Para 17.14-17.18] Constitution of India - Seventh Schedule, Lists I, II & III - Fee

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 2012

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-i Vs. Joint Secretary(Revisionar ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-02-2012

Subject : Excise

Articles) Act, 1978 (40 of 1978); (d) the National Calamity Contingent duty leviable under section 136 of the Finance Act, 2001 (14 of 2001), as amended by Section 169 of the Finance Act, 2003 (32 of 2003) and further … duty (hereinafter referred as CVD) paid on the inputs utilized for manufacture. These applications were made under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, read with notification No. 21/2004-CE(NT) dated 6th September, 2004. In some cases,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2014

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-2014

Subject : Service Tax

Special Importance) Act, 1957( 58 of 1957);(v)(v) the National Calamity Contingent duty leviable under section 136 of the Finance Act, 2001 (14 of 2001)(vi)(vi) the Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 91 read with section 93 of … by the Tribunal had filed Central Excise Appeal no.116 of 2010 before this Court. By an order dated 18.11.2010 passed by this Court while admitting the appeal filed by the appellant, directed the Tribunal to dispose of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 2008

South Indian Bank Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-28-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act - Sections 28, 36(1), 139, 142(1), 143(1), 143(1A), 143(3) and 156; Finance Act, 2001

Reported in : [2009]316ITR306(Ker); 2008(3)KLT326; [2009]176TAXMAN277(Ker)

debatable issue and is ceased to be so only by virtue of Explanation introduced to Section 36(1)(vii) by Finance Act 2001 with effect from 1.4.1989. The contention of counsel for the appellant is that as on date of completion

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 2001

Ram Nath Jindal Vs. Cit

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-19-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)170CTR(P& H)251

Matched in: Citation (2001)170CTR(P& H)251

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 23 2012

Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation Vs. C ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Decided on : May-23-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

such cases: para 260. It was not open to the Revenue to rely on section 320 of the Finance Act 2004 ("Section 320 FA 2004") or section 107 of the Finance Act 2007 ("Section 107 FA 2007") to … in Metallgesellschaft (Joined Cases C-397/98 and C-410/98) [2001] Ch 620on 8 March 2001 there was no general appreciation that the UK corporation tax regime was … the system of advance corporation tax ("ACT") and to the taxation of dividend income from non-resident sources under section 18 (Schedule D, Case V) of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 ("the ICTA") ("the DV provisions"). The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial