Advanced Search Results

Goa Handicrafts, Rural and Small Scale Industries Development Corporat ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 21A, 22A, 118 and 138 to 142; ;Companies Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 378

Reported in : II(2006)BC278; 2005CriLJ4072

Judgment in the case of Kochayippa v. Suprasidhan and in the case of Andhra Engineering Corporation v. TCI Finance Ltd. 1999 OCR 130. He also relied on another Judgment of the Kerala High Court in the case … Sessions Judge. Panaji, who by his Order dated 5-9-2003 acquitted the Respondent /Accused for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act, for short) and who by his Judgment and Order was pleased … the Supreme Court in the case of K.N. Beena v. Muniyappan : 2001CriLJ4745 . He further submitted that a mere disability of the Accused to

Jyoti W/O Rajkumar Sahajwani Vs. Shri Sadhu S/O Safarmal Manjani and A ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

(2) Mh.L.J. 1003 (Mamatadevi Prafullakumar Bhansali...Versus...Pushpadevi Kailashkumar Agrawal and another). (b) AIR 2009 Supreme Court 422 (M/s. Shankar Finance and Investments ...Versus... State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.). 35. In the case of MamatadeviPrafullakumar Bhansali...Versus...Pushpadevi Kailashkumar Agrawal … (Zenna Sorabji and others...Versus...Mirabelle Hotel Co. (Pvt.) Ltd. and others). (C) AIR 2001 Madras 466 (Mettur Beardsell Ltd....Versus...M/s. Salem Textile Ltd. and others). 20. Again … by the present appellant was dismissed and present respondent no.1/original accused was acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 4. In order to appreciate the rival submissions in the present appeal and

M/S. Enpee Earthmovers and Others Vs. M/S.Resources International and ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

that the interest has been calculated on amount of provisional bills and not final bills. Relying upon “Karekar Finance Pvt. Ltd. V/s Shri M. N. Bashyam and anr.” [2007(2) Goa L.R. 465], the learned Counsel contended that … SC 3014 (Para 16). 15. K.P.G. Nair V/s Jindal Menthol India Ltd. 2001 ALL MR (Cri) 1206 (Para 12). 16. Chandu Vs. State of Maharashtra … impugned in the present appeals, the Complaints filed by the appellant against the accused for offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. (N.I. Act, for short) were all dismissed. 3. The parties shall hereinafter

Sada Vijay Kumar Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

the legal position in identically placed situation was indicated by this Court in the matter of M/s. Credential Finance Limited and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another decided on 1st March, 2000 reported in 2000 (3) … P.C: 1. Heard finally. 2. In proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act process is challenged by the Applicant. 3. Applicant had availed financial facilities from

Sri Chaitanya Educational Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2007)106ITD256(Hyd.)

ITD 398 had occasion to consider the applicability of the amended provisions of Section 254(2A) inserted by the Finance Act, 2001 with effect from 1.6.2001, to the matters where stay had already been granted prior to that date. After … of Income-tax, Eighth Edition (revised by Hon'ble Supreme Court Justice Mr. S. Ranganathan) Vol.1 at page 57 under Section 138 with the head note 'Retroactive Legislation' and Chatuvedi & Pithisaria's 'Income-tax Law' Fourth Edition, 1990 Vol.1 at page

P. Mohanraj Vs. M/s. Shah Brothers Ispat Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

as it refers to “transactions” as may be notified by the Central Government in consultation with experts in finance. The expression “financial sector regulator” is defined by Section 3(18) as follows: “3. Definitions.-In this Code, unless the … Shri Mehta also relied upon D.K. Kapur v. Reserve Bank of India, 2001 SCC OnLine Del 67 : (2001) 58 DRJ424(DB). This judgment referred to … reason “funds insufficient” on 03.03.2017. As a result, on 31.03.2017, the respondent issued a statutory demand notice under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, calling upon the company and its three Directors,

Rohit Chunubhai Mehta Vs. Gujarat State Fertilizer Co. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138, 141 and 141(2); ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 114 and 420; ;Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 18A, 291, 292 and 293; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 244 and 258

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2298; (2004)3GLR1952

justified.4.5. It was vehemently argued by Mr. Thakkar that, there being a managing director (accused No.1), a whole-time finance director (accused No.12) and a finance manager (accused No.13) and the signing and delivery of the cheques having … OF BIHAR [(2000) 4 SCC 168], S.N.PALANITKAR v. STATE OF BIHAR [AIR 2001 SC 2960], 1990 Suppl. SCC 607, AJAY MITRA v. STATE OF M.P. … 26.7.1995 were ordered to be issued to all the accused (Nos.1 to 14) for the offences punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ('NI Act' for short) and sections 420 and 114 of the Indian

M.S. Raghunathan Vs. Rajesh Shah and Co.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1981 - Sections 138, 138 to 142; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Constitution of India - Article 226; Banking, Public Financial Institutions and Negotiable Instruments Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988; Companies Act

Reported in : I(2006)BC349; 2005CriLJ2077; (2005)2GLR1750

2001 is filed in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vadodara for alleged commission of offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1981 ('the Act' for short) in which process has been issued, has prayed … purchase and sale of shares as per oral or telephonic instructions issued from its customers. Brijlaxmi Leasing & Finance Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, is accused No.1 ('accused company' in short) in the said

Pandurang Camotim Sancoalcar Vs. Suresh Prabhakar Prabhu and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CompanyCriminal

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(26), 303 and 303(2); Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 141; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

Reported in : 2001BomCR(Cri)857; [2003]113CompCas600(Bom); 2001CriLJ2945; 2000(4)MhLj429; [2003]48SCL437(Bom)

particularly of a judgment delivered by Justice Lodha in the case of Dushyant D. Anjaria v. Wall Street Finance Ltd. : (2001)1BOMLR387 ; [2001] All. M. R. 62. The resignation becomes effective as soon as it is … arise out of 23 complaint cases filed by the respective complainants before the Judicial Magistrate First Class under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as the 'said Act'). In all those complaints, the

Sarathi Leasing Finance Limited Vs. Sri B. Narayana Shetty

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Banking

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 142; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act - Sections 78 and 79; Companies Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 4(2) and 190

Reported in : II(2007)BC1; [2006]131CompCas798(Kar); ILR2006KAR1929; 2006(3)KarLJ397

Matched in: Parties Sarathi Leasing Finance Limited Vs. Sri B. Narayana Shetty