Advanced Search Results

M/S. Filatex India Limited and Another Vs. Commissioner of Central Exc ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Service Tax

No 641/32/2002-CX dated 26.06.2002 has issued following clarification:- I am directed to refer to Section 129 of the Finance Act, 2001 relating to imposition of National Calamity Contingent Duty (NCCD) and Notification No. 42/2001-C.E. (N.T.), dated 26-6-2001 relating to

themis Pharmaceuticals and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)(157)ELT569Tri(Mum.)bai

CCE, Bhubaneshwar Vs Oripof Industries -2003(155) ELT 278 (Tri-LB) in the context of another amendment made through the Finance Act, 2001 to the effect that after a conscious interference by the legislature to do away with a specific power, … Additional Members and creation of Additional Benches by the Government at Mumbai for a period of 2-3 years. Section 129 (1) of the Customs Act, 1962 allows the Central Government to appoint as many Members as it thinks

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Special Importance) Act, 1957( 58 of 1957);(v)(v) the National Calamity Contingent duty leviable under section 136 of the Finance Act, 2001 (14 of 2001)(vi)(vi) the Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 91 read with section 93 of … Co.(P) Ltd., (1972) 4 Supreme Court Cases 121; (c) CC, Kolkata Vs. Rupa and Co. Ltd., (2004(170) E.L.T. 129 (S.C.)) (d) Indian Farmers Fertilisers Co-op. Ltd. Vs. C.C.E., Ahmedabad, (1996(86) E.L.T. 177(S.C.) (e) M/s. J.K. Cotton Spinning

Chandra Prakash Agrawal Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax and o ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 15(1), 15A(1), 32(2), 68, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C, 113, 129, 132, 132(1), 132A, 132A(2), 132A(3), 132B, 132(4A) to 132(14), 139, 139(1), 142, 142(1), 142(2A), 143, 143(1), 143(1B), 143(2), 143(3), 144, 145, 147, 148, 158BA, 158BA(2), 158B to 158BI, 234A, 234B, 234C, 245C, 245D(1), 245D(2), 245D(4), 245H, 246, 246A, 253, 263, 271(1), 271A, 271B and 278D; ;Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(4), 37 and 131(1); Finance Act, 1995; Finance Act, 2001; Finance Act, 1998; Emergency Powers Act, 920

Reported in : (2006)206CTR(All)505; [2006]287ITR172(All)

income of a designated period consisting of ten previous years, now reduced to six previous years by the Finance Act, 2001, with effect from June 1, 2001, preceding the previous year in which the search was conducted and also … part of the proceeding or giving an opportunity to the assessee to be re-heard under the proviso to Section 129 ; or(iv) in a case where an application made before the Settlement Commission under Section 245C is rejected

M/S Pml Industries Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Anot ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

six months from the date on which it is filed. (sub-section (4A) inserted by Section 129 of the Finance Act, 2001 w.e.f. 11.05.2001) xx xx”. “35C. Orders of Appellate Tribunal - xx xx (2A) The Appellate Tribunal, shall where

Binani Zinc Ltd. and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Excise

reference to retrospective validation of action taken under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act 1944 under the Finance Act 2001, is relevant in this context to decide the issue. She drew our attention to the relevant portion of … for rectification of mistake apparent from the record contained in Section 35-C(2) of the Central Excise Act and Section 129 B2 of the Customs Tax Act are pari-materia with the Section 35 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957

Ester Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

specifically recorded that though a prayer was made in the writ petition to declare certain provisions of the Finance Act, 2008 to be unconstitutional, yet in course of hearing Mr. R. Santhanam, learned counsel for the assessee-petitioner and … of the impugned order.7. Another point which was argued by the counsel for the petitioner was based on Section 129 of the Act. It was his contention that the objections to the notice were filed before a particular

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Ramesh Chand Soni

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 142(2A), 153, 158BE and 158BH; Finance Act, 1996; Finance (Amendment) Act, 2002; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 30

Reported in : (2005)194CTR(Raj)84

period requiring for completing the assessment. The proviso came into effect w.e.f. 1st June, 2002, on commencement of Finance Act, 2002 by which Expln. 1 to Section 158BE was substituted in place of previous Expln. 1. In this … Tribunal found the assessment of block period 1988-89 framed on 8th March, 2001 to be barred by time in view of the existing provisions as … part of the proceeding or giving an opportunity to the assessee to be reheard under the proviso to Section 129; or(iv) in a case where an application made before the Settlement Commission under Section 245C is rejected by

Ester Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

the writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India including declaring certain provisions of the Finance Act, 2008 to be unconstitutional, yet in course of hearing Mr. R. Santhanam, learned counsel for the assessee-petitioner and … case being the retrospective amendment, the notice is valid.10. The last argument of the petitioner is based on section 129. It is contended that the petitioner filed its objections to the notice before a particular officer, but the

D.Vijayakumari Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 - Section 5A, 2(h), 3 (1), 37; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 307, 457, 380, 511, 147, 448, 427, 506(ii), 447, 294(b), 323; Code of Criminal Procedure (CPC) - Section 161, 167(2), 173(8); PPDL Act - Section 3; Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Charging Exorbitant Interest Act, 2003 - Section 3, 4; Constitution of India - Article 226, 21, 22(5), 22 clauses (4) to (7)

decision of this Court in P.A.S.Syed Mohideen V. The Joint Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi and another [(1991) 1 MWN (Cri) 226 (HC)] wherein, in paragraphs 11 and … of Habeas Corpus to call for the entire records related to the Petitioner's husband's detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 vide detention order, dated 16.9.2011 on the file of the Second Respondent herein made in … 2011 of R-7 K.K. Nagar Police Station which is under most serious Sections of I.P.C. of the three cases and further, the non consideration of … (v) The case in R-7 K.K.Nagar Police Station Crime No.1107/2011 under Sections 129(b), 409, 420, 386, 506(ii) I.P.C. and Section 3 r/w 4 of Tamil