Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2001 chapter 3 · Page 1 of about 2,156 results (0.045 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 07 2008

Commissioner of Income Central Ii Vs. Suresh N. Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-07-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 4, 4(1), 32, 32(2), 68, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C, 112, 113, 115A, 115AB, 115AC, 115ACA, 115AD, 115B, 115BB, 115BBA, 115E, 115JB, 132, 132A, 132B, 139, 139(1), 142, 142(1), 143, 143(1B), 143(2), 143(3), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 158BA, 158BA(1), 158BA(2), 158BB, 158BB(1), 158BC, 158BH, 161, 161(1A), 164, 164A, 167B, 245D and 245D(4); Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 2(1), 2(2) and 2(3); Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 113; Finance Act, 1995; Constitution of India - Articles 269, 270 and 271

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(SC)274; [2008]297ITR322(SC); JT2008(1)SC208; 2008(1)SCALE99; (2008)4SCC362; 2008AIRSCW1066

appeal.Points for determination:4. Two points arise for determination: Whether on the facts and circumstances of this case, the Finance Act, 2001 ('FA' for short) was applicable to 'block assessment' under Chapter XIV-B in respect of the search carried out … a result of search.158BA. (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other provisions of this Act where after the 30th day of June, 1995 a search is initiated under Section 132 or books of account, other documents or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 2008

Plastiblends India Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Ac ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-19-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 29 to 43A, 72, 80A, 80AA, 80AB, 80B(5), 80E, 80HH, 80HH(6), 80HH(7), 80I, 80IA, 80IA(5), 80IA(8), 80IA(10), 80IB, 80IB(13), 143(1), 143(3), 147 and 260A; Companies Act, 1956; Taxation Laws (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1986 - Sections 34(1); Finance (No. 2) Act, 1980; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 5

Reported in : (2009)223CTR(Bom)291; [2009]178TAXMAN397(Bom)

the Act which continued till the assessment year 2002-2003, when explanation to Section 5 was inserted by the Finance Act 2001 with effect from 1.4.2002 and, therefore, the Tribunal erred in holding that omission of Section 34(1) by Taxation … in the return for the normal computation of income has to be allowed while computing the deductions under Chapter VI-A viz. Sections 80HH, 80-IA, 80-IB etc. of an industrial undertaking?9. The Special Bench by its order dated … the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal ('the Tribunal' for short) dated 30.3.2007 raising the following substantial question of law.Whether on the facts and in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 2003

Prithviraj Chouhan Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-09-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(1), 234A, 234B; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 254 and 254(2)

Reported in : [2004]267ITR450(MP)

1 has been substituted in Section 234B of the Act with effect from April 1, 1989, by the Finance Act, 2001. The said Explanation has been made effective retrospectively with effect from April 1, 1989. By this Explanation 1 … as reduced by the amount of tax deducted or collected at source in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XVII of any income, which is subject to such deduction or collection. So by legal fiction Explanation 1 … Court clarifies that Dr. Jaidev Siddha v. Jaiprakash Siddha, 2007(2) MPJR (FB) 361; AIR 2007 MP 269 (FB) is not impliedly overruled in view of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 12 2002

Cce Vs. Oripol Industries, Utkal

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : May-12-2002

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2003)(88)ECC239

(Appeals) does have jurisdiction to remand the appeal before him after the amendment of Section 35A by the Finance Act, 2001 w.e.f. 11.5.2001. Reference was necessitated in view of difference of opinion between two Benches of this Tribunal on … confiscation than has been adjudged against him in 'the original decision or order." Under the Finance Act, 1980 Chapter IV-A was introduced and the procedure in appeal was brought under Section 35A. Relevant provisions regarding the appellate … jurisdiction to remand the appeal before him after the amendment of Section 35A by the Finance Act, 2001 w.e.f. 11.5.2001. Reference was necessitated in view

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 12 2003

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Oripol Industries

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : May-12-2003

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2002)LC396Tri(Delhi)

(Appeals) does have jurisdiction to remand the appeal before him after the amendment to Section 35A by the Finance Act, 2001 w.e.f. 11-5-2001. Reference was necessitated in view of difference of opinion between two Benches of this Tribunal on … confiscation than has been adjudged against him in the original decision or order." Under the Finance Act, 1980 Chapter IVA was introduced and the procedure in appeal was brought under Section 35A. Relevant provisions regarding the appellate … jurisdiction to remand the appeal before him after the amendment to Section 35A by the Finance Act, 2001 w.e.f. 11-5-2001. Reference was necessitated in view

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 2005

Wallfort Shares and Stock Brokers Vs. Ito

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-15-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)96ITD1(Mum.)

by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1991 with retrospective effect from 1-4-1972; insertion of section 14-A by the Finance Act, 2001 with retrospective effect from 1-4-1962; Explanation to section 36(1)(viii) by Finance Act, 1992 with retrospective effect from 1-4-1987 … income received from a mutual fund was exempt under the provisions of section 10(33) of the Act in Chapter III of the Income Tax Act. The heading of Chapter III read "Incomes which do not form part … 57,31,610 on 29-10-2001. The assessing officer completed assessment under section 143(3) on 31-3-2003 at total income of Rs. 2,58,46,553. During the year the assessee was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 2005

Wallfort Shares and Stock Brokers Vs. Income-tax Officer [Alongwith

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-15-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1991 with retrospective effect from 1.4.1972; insertion of Section 14-A by the Finance Act, 2001 with retrospective effect from 1.4.1962; Explanation to Section 36(1)(viii) by Finance Act, 1992 with retrospective effect from 1.4.1987 … income received from a mutual fund was exempt under the provisions of Section 10(33) of the Act in Chapter III of the Income-tax Act. The heading of Chapter III read "Incomes which do not form part of … 29th October, 2001. The Assessing Officer completed assessment Under Section 143(3) on 31.3.2003 at total income of Rs. 2,58,46,553/-.During the year the assessee was a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2010

Tata Sky Limited Vs. the State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Jul-26-2010

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; ; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 4; ; Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1979 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4A, 4A(4), 4B and 4C; ; Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax (Amendment) Act, 2009; ; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 65(5), 65(13), 65(63), 65(72) and 137; ; Prasar Bharti (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990 - Section 2; ; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 65, 66(5), 65(14), 65(15), 65(80) and 65(90); ; Finance Act, 2003 - Section 65, 65(16), 65(95), 65(105) and 66(1); ; Finance Act, 2004; ; Finance Act, 2005 - Section 65(16) and 65(105); ; Government of India Act, 1935; ; Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995; ; Bengal Amusements Tax Act, 1922; ; We

the fact, that broadcasting was subjected to tax liability as a 'service' for the first time under the Finance Act, 2001. Chapter V. of the Finance Act, 2001 bears the heading 'Service Tax'. Section 65(13) of the Finance Act, 2001 … the petitioner company by filing Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2562 of 2007, and thereafter, Writ Petition (M/S) No. 353 of 2008.7. The principal contention on behalf the petitioner, while assailing the action of the District Magistrates, in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 2015

M/S Wipro Limited Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-25-2015

Subject : Direct Taxation

not form part of total income”. It may be noted that when section 10A was recast by the Finance Act, 2001, Parliament was aware of the character of relief given in Chapter III. Chapter III deals with - 66 … MR. JUSTICE B.SREENIVASE GOWDA I.T.A.No.879/2008 c/w I.T.A.Nos.882/2008, 907/2008, 909/2008, 880/2008, 881/2008, 904/2008, 905/2008, 108/2009, 109/2009, 210/2009, 211/2009, 209/2009, 333/2009, 334/2009 & 363/2009 In ITA No.879/2008: BETWEEN : M/s Wipro Limited 76R & 80P, Doddakannelli, Sarjapur Road, Bangalore

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2006

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Tamil Nadu Silk Producers

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

Decided on : Apr-28-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)105ITD623(Chennai)

which reads as under: Restriction on reopening of completed assessments on account of provisions of Section 14AClarification regardingThe Finance Act, 2001, has inserted Section 14A in the IT Act, 1961, wherein it was specifically provided that no deduction shall … in relation to income not includible in total income.For the purposes of computing the total income under this Chapter, no deduction shall be allowed in respect of expenditure incurred by the assessee in relation to income which … restricted the deduction under Section 80P(2)(e) to the net receipts of Rs. 38,20,117 by reducing the expenditure of Rs. 14,95,449 from the gross receipts for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial