Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2000 section 79 · Page 1 of about 1,032 results (0.045 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 17 2005

Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-17-2005

Subject : ConstitutionService Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 116 and 117; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 158; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rules 2(1); Service Tax (Amendment) Rules, 1997; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 64(3), 65, 65(5), 65(28), 65(41), 66, 66(3), 67, 68, 68(1), 69, 69(2), 69(5), 70, 70(1), 71, 71A, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 and 94; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 68(1A) and 84; Finance Act, 1998; Service Tax (Amendment) Rules, 1998; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 246(1); Punjab Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1952 - Sections 3(3); Service Tax Act, 1994

Reported in : AIR2005SC3020; (2005)4CompLJ440(SC); (2005)194CTR(SC)428; 2005(99)ECC377; 2005(182)ELT33(SC); [2005]274ITR194(SC); JT2005(Suppl3)SC389; (2005)4SCC214; 2006[3]STR608; 200

to costs. Constitution - constitutional validity - Article 14 of Constitution of India, Sections 116 and 117 of Finance Act, 2000, Section 158 of Finance Act, 2003, Rule 2 (1) of Service Rules, 1994 - petitioner challenging constitutional validity of … furnish the prescribed return. Section 78 deals with the penalty for suppressing the value of taxable service and Section 79 for penalty for failure to comply with notices. No other section is required to be noted except Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 2003

Additional Commissioner of Vs. Hughes Services (Far East) (P.)

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-24-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)87ITD137(Delhi)

contending that off-period salary is taxable in view of the provisions of Explanationto Section 9(1)(ii) as substituted by Finance Act, 1999 which, according to him, is retrospective in operation, being clarificatory/declaratory in nature. It was emphasized by him … as CIT v. S.G. Pgnatale [1980] 124 ITR 391 : 4 Taxman 79 to illustrate the meaning of the words ' earned in India used … 5.3 has clearly stated that the amendment shall be effective from 1-4-2000 and, therefore, apply to assessment year 2000-01 and subsequent assessment years.5. Rival submissions of the parties have been considered carefully. The question for consideration is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 2001

Ram Nath Jindal Vs. Cit

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-19-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)170CTR(P& H)251

has not been claimed by the assessee. This position is further obvious from the fact that in the Finance Act, 2001, Explnation 5 has been inserted in section 32(1)(ii) with effect from 1-4-2002. It has been inter alia

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 12 2004

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Pandian Hotels Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Oct-12-2004

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2005)(180)ELT458Tri(Chennai)

For the delay of payments, the original authority imposed penalties on the assessee under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, which were quantitatively equal to the respective amounts of tax. Against these penalties, the assessee preferred appeals … delayed payment of service tax for the period October, 1999 to March, 2000. The Original authority had dropped the proposal to penalise the assessee under … in certain cases. - Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of Section 76, Section 77, Section 78 or Section 79, no penalty shall be imposable on the assessee for any failure referred to in the said provisions if

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 2008

Indian National Shipowners Association Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-11-2008

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 5(2), 64, 65, 65(105), 66, 66A, 68, 68(2), 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 and 94; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 25; Merchant Shipping Act, 1958; Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone, and other Maritime Zones Act, 1976 - Sections 6(6) and 7(7); Factories Act, 1948; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Central Excise Act, 1944; Finance Act, 2005; Finance Act, 2006; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rule 2 and 2(1); Central Excise Rules; Constitution of India - Article 265

Reported in : (2009)222CTR(Bom)234; [2009]16STJ175; 2009[13]STR235

Deshmukh, J.1. By this Petition the Petitioners challenge the constitutional validity of the following:(i) Section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994; (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act for the sake of brevity), which has been introduced with effect … furnish the prescribed return. Section 78 deals with the penalty for suppression the value of the taxable service. Section 79 deals with penalty for failure to comply with notice. Section 94 of the Act empowers the Central Government

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2007

Gem Star Enterprises (P) Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on : Mar-30-2007

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)11STJ77CESTAT(Bang.)alore

tax amounting to Rs. 5,60,937/- along with interest. A penalty of Rs. 1,000/- under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 has been imposed. Further a penalty of Rs. 100/- per day for the period 26.1.2000 to 31.1.2006 … We may read that Section: Notwithstanding anything contained the provision of Section 76 and 77, Section 78 and Section 79, no penalty shall be impossible on the assessee for any failure referred to in the said provision, if

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 2003

Finquick Finance (P.) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Aug-25-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)87ITD323(Delhi)

Matched in: Parties Finquick Finance (P.) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2005

Garrick D'Silva Vs. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Dec-09-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)105TTJ(Delhi)445

the shares, was liable to tax as income from 'capital gains'. This sub-Clause (iii)(a) was deleted by the Finance Act, 2000 w.e.f. 1st April, 2001 and a new proviso to sub-Clause (iii) of Clause 2 of Section 17 was … the perquisite value of residential accommodation at Rs. 15,53,803 as under:Salary for the purpose of Rule 3 Rs. 79,98,038.1Salary as per Appendix I Rs. 79,98,038.1Acid : Housing contribution Rs. 10,02,083.6 Auto norm Rs. 1,10,505.0in the assessment order)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 2004

Maruti Udyog Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-11-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2005]92ITD120(Delhi)

The legislature made retrospective amendment to section 28 of the Act by inserting clauses (iiia) to (iiic) by Finance Act, 1990 with effect from 1-4-1962. Thus, income by way of duty drawback became taxable income by virtue of … per assessed's formula would come to 2200 components (500 + 2500 - 800) as against actual consumption of 2000 components (20 X 100). This difference of 200 components, unless explained by the assessed in a satisfactory manner, … judgment of Supreme Court in the case of Arvind Mills Ltd. 32,41,870. 79. In view of the above factual background, the learned counsel for assessed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 2009

The Commissioner of Income Tax and Vs. Brindavan Beverages Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-30-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(14), 2(19AA), 2(42C), 41[2], 45, 48, 50B, 80IA(4), 80IB(4), 80IB(5), 80HHC, 80HHC(3), 80HHC(3A), 80HHC(4), 80HHC(4A), 115A, 115B, 115BB, 115C, 115J, 115JA, 115JA[1], 115JA[2], 115JA[4], 115JB, 143(2), 161[1A], 164, 164A, 207, 208, 209, 209[1], 210, 211, 215, 234, 234A, 234B, 234C, 234G, 254(2) and 260A; Finance [No. 2] Act, 1996; Finance Act, 1997; Finance Act, 1998; Finance Act, 1999; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 2; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 210; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1) and 17(1); Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : (2010)228CTR(Kar)1; [2010]186TAXMAN233(Kar)

of the Act for the purpose of computing advance tax and the rate is provided in part-III of Finance Act, 2000 is a clear indication of the scheme of legislature not to compel an assessee to do an impossible … The computation section fails, resulting in failure of the charging section also. 79. In this background, when we examine the authorities relied upon by the … D.V. Shylendra Kumar 1. This is an appeal of the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') directed against the order dated 31.03.2005 passed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial