Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2000 section 51 · Page 1 of about 1,841 results (0.077 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 14 2007

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Syncome Formulations (i) Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-14-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)106ITD193(Mum.)

a new Section 115JB from the asst. yr. 2001-02 onwards. This new provision has been introduced by the Finance Act, 2000. This section also retained the deduction available under Section 80HHC under Expln. (iv) provided under Section 115JB(1). In

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 2021

Engineering Analysis Centre Of Excellence Private Limited Vs. The Comm ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-02-2021

Subject : Direct Taxation

Act 2001 (14 of 2001), sec. 4(ii), for “sub-clauses (i) to (v)” (w.e.f. 1-4-2002). 18 Substituted by the Finance Act 2000 (10 of 2000), sec. 4, for Explanation 3 (w.e.f. 1-4-2001). Explanation 3 before substitution, stood as under: “Explanation … to royalty and as this was so, the same constituted taxable income deemed to accrue in India under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Income Tax Act”]., thereby making it incumbent upon all such persons … copyright is parted with by the original owner. He added that section 51(b) of the Copyright Act makes it clear that when any person makes

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 10 2002

Fabworth (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jun-10-2002

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2002)LC945Tri(Delhi)

proviso to Section 3(1) of the Central Excise Act, as it stood prior to its amendment by the Finance Act, 2000, reads as under :- "Provided that the duties of excise which shall be levied and collected on any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 18 2004

Dharmpal Satyapal Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : May-18-2004

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 9, 11, 11A and 35F; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 154 and 154(3); Finance Act, 1982 - Sections 51; Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 - Sections 39 and 39(5); Small Causes Courts Act - Sections 17; Court-fees Act - Sections 6; Customs Act; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1), 9 and 49; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 226

person chargeable with the duty. Referring to paragraph 31 of the judgment, he submitted that the provisions of Section 51 of the Finance Act, 1982 by which retrospective effect to the amendments of Rules 9 and 49 of … 8.7.1999..The Union of India preferred SLP (c) No. 4131-34/2003 against the judgment in writ appeal.14.5.2003 : By the Finance Act, 2003, the benefit of Notification No. 32/1999 dated 8.7.1999, withdrawn from its inception viz. from 8.7.1999 to 28.2.2001 … alia engaged in the manufacture of Pan masala containing tobacco since November 2000. They availed the benefit of the said Notification No. 32/1999 and become

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 2007

Virtual Soft Systems Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-i

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-06-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28(1), 48, 143, 143(1), 143(1A), 260A, 271 and 271(1); Finance Act, 1975; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 271; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975; Finance Act, 1993; Finance Act, 1992; Finance Act, 1951; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 23(5), 28 and 28(1); Constitution of India - Article 20(1)

Reported in : (2007)207CTR(SC)733; [2007]289ITR83(SC); JT2007(3)SC125; 2007(2)SCALE612; (2007)9SCC665

the Punjab and Haryana High Court pertaining to the assessment year 1970-71 was prior to the amendment of Finance Act, 1975 and therefore, was not applicable. For the same reason, the decision of this Court in affirming the … in : [2001]249ITR670(SC) (SC), CIT v. Prithipal Singh & Co. 171 iTR 51 (P&H; High Court, CIT v. Virendra & Co.), : [1999]240ITR47(Ker) (Kerala High … Court of Delhi against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short 'the Tribunal') under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act. Assessee also filed ITA No. of 2004 being aggrieved against a part

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 21 2014

Kunal Anand Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Nov-21-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Games­ 2007, a meeting was held on 24.09.2004 in presence of the then Chief Minister­Housing Minister, Development Commissioner, Finance Secretary, Housing Secretary, Managing Director of Jharkhand State Housing Board and others. In the said meeting, a decision … wholly without jurisdiction, in as much as, Section 24(3)(b) and Section 27 of the Jharkhand State Housing Board Act, 2000 are not applicable in the facts of the present case. A further prayer has been made seeking quashing … M/s. Excel Venture Construction Pvt. Ltd. W.P. (C) No. 4444 of 2011 51. Claiming payment of a sum of Rs. 24 lacs (approx.) to M/s.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 21 2014

M/S Kamla Aditya Construction Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Nov-21-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Games­ 2007, a meeting was held on 24.09.2004 in presence of the then Chief Minister­Housing Minister, Development Commissioner, Finance Secretary, Housing Secretary, Managing Director of Jharkhand State Housing Board and others. In the said meeting, a decision … wholly without jurisdiction, in as much as, Section 24(3)(b) and Section 27 of the Jharkhand State Housing Board Act, 2000 are not applicable in the facts of the present case. A further prayer has been made seeking quashing … M/s. Excel Venture Construction Pvt. Ltd. W.P. (C) No. 4444 of 2011 51. Claiming payment of a sum of Rs. 24 lacs (approx.) to M/s.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 21 2014

Modi Projects Limited Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Nov-21-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Games­ 2007, a meeting was held on 24.09.2004 in presence of the then Chief Minister­Housing Minister, Development Commissioner, Finance Secretary, Housing Secretary, Managing Director of Jharkhand State Housing Board and others. In the said meeting, a decision … wholly without jurisdiction, in as much as, Section 24(3)(b) and Section 27 of the Jharkhand State Housing Board Act, 2000 are not applicable in the facts of the present case. A further prayer has been made seeking quashing … M/s. Excel Venture Construction Pvt. Ltd. W.P. (C) No. 4444 of 2011 51. Claiming payment of a sum of Rs. 24 lacs (approx.) to M/s.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 21 2014

Simplex Infrastructures Limite Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Nov-21-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Games­ 2007, a meeting was held on 24.09.2004 in presence of the then Chief Minister­Housing Minister, Development Commissioner, Finance Secretary, Housing Secretary, Managing Director of Jharkhand State Housing Board and others. In the said meeting, a decision … wholly without jurisdiction, in as much as, Section 24(3)(b) and Section 27 of the Jharkhand State Housing Board Act, 2000 are not applicable in the facts of the present case. A further prayer has been made seeking quashing … M/s. Excel Venture Construction Pvt. Ltd. W.P. (C) No. 4444 of 2011 51. Claiming payment of a sum of Rs. 24 lacs (approx.) to M/s.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 21 2014

Excel Venture Construction Co. Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Nov-21-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Games­ 2007, a meeting was held on 24.09.2004 in presence of the then Chief Minister­Housing Minister, Development Commissioner, Finance Secretary, Housing Secretary, Managing Director of Jharkhand State Housing Board and others. In the said meeting, a decision … wholly without jurisdiction, in as much as, Section 24(3)(b) and Section 27 of the Jharkhand State Housing Board Act, 2000 are not applicable in the facts of the present case. A further prayer has been made seeking quashing … M/s. Excel Venture Construction Pvt. Ltd. W.P. (C) No. 4444 of 2011 51. Claiming payment of a sum of Rs. 24 lacs (approx.) to M/s.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial