Advanced Search Results
English Indian Clays Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Kerala
Sep-17-2004
Sales Tax/VAT
Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 23(3); Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 9(1), 9(2), 9(2A) and 9(2B); Union Finance Act, 2000; Revenue Recovery Act - Sections 7 and 34; Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 - Sections 48; Central Sales Tax (Amendment) Act - Sections 9 and 9(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 20, 258(1), 258(2) and 265
(2008)11VST709(Ker)
that Section 9(2), 9(2A) and 9(2B) of the CST Act and the validation clause enacted by the Union Finance Act, 2000 as unconstitutional and invalid. There is a further prayer for a declaration that the validation clause introduced by … the Constitution; and5. that in the case of assessees of the State of Haryana it is urged that Section 48 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 is void as it confers arbitrary and unguided power on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Income Tax and Vs. Brindavan Beverages Ltd.
Karnataka
Sep-30-2009
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(14), 2(19AA), 2(42C), 41[2], 45, 48, 50B, 80IA(4), 80IB(4), 80IB(5), 80HHC, 80HHC(3), 80HHC(3A), 80HHC(4), 80HHC(4A), 115A, 115B, 115BB, 115C, 115J, 115JA, 115JA[1], 115JA[2], 115JA[4], 115JB, 143(2), 161[1A], 164, 164A, 207, 208, 209, 209[1], 210, 211, 215, 234, 234A, 234B, 234C, 234G, 254(2) and 260A; Finance [No. 2] Act, 1996; Finance Act, 1997; Finance Act, 1998; Finance Act, 1999; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 2; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 210; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1) and 17(1); Constitution of India - Article 141
(2010)228CTR(Kar)1; [2010]186TAXMAN233(Kar)
of the Act for the purpose of computing advance tax and the rate is provided in part-III of Finance Act, 2000 is a clear indication of the scheme of legislature not to compel an assessee to do an impossible … generalization that, in all situations of slump sale, computation provision for ascertainment of capital gains in terms of Section 48 of the Act is not workable, for the reason that one of the two amounts viz., full value
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNava Bharat Ferro Alloys Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Andhra Pradesh
Jan-27-2005
Service Tax
Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 65(7), 65(18A), 65(18B), 65(48), 116 and 117; Finance Act, 1997; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 66 68, 70, 71A and 94; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 68, 68(1), 69, 70, 71 and 71A; Assam Taxation (On Goods Carried by Road or on Inland Waterways) Act; Central Tea Act - Sections 3(1) and 3(2); Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 43, 43(1), 43(1A) and 44; Rajasthan Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1959 - Sections 3 and 4; Karnataka Entertainments Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2; Expenditure Tax Act, 1987; British North America Act, 1867 - Sections 91 and 92; Finance Act, 1998 - Sections 65, 65(16), 65(17), 65(41) and 66(3); Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 84; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rule 2 and 2(1); Service Tax (Amendm
(2005)186CTR(AP)451; 2005(185)ELT236(AP); 2006[3]STR565
of service tax by users of clearing and forwarding agents service and users of goods transport service. By Finance Act, 2000, the Parliament amended the provisions for the limited period of 16.7.1997 to 16.10.1998 to enable collection of tax … self assessment of the service tax and the provisions of Section 71 shall apply accordingly.In Finance Act of 2000, Section 117 lays down:117. Validation of certain action taken under Service Tax Rules. - Notwithstanding anything contained in any
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Parbhudas Kishoredas Tobacco Products Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India ...
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-25-2004
Sales Tax/VAT
(2009)20VST853(MP)
in any judgment, decree or order of any court, Tribunal or other authority. By providing validation in the Finance Act, 2000, Section 116 of the said Act, the Government has also amended the definition of the term 'assessee'. It has … Keepers as intra vires was called in question. In the said decision their Lordships in paragraphs 46 to 48 (48 to 50 of 135 STC) have expressed the view thus:46. The phrase 'including' has also been construed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Ram Kumar Giri
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai
May-12-2006
Direct Taxation
(2006)103TTJ(Chennai)352
above clauses are outside the purview of the non-compete agreement entered by the assessee.11. The amendment in the Finance Act, 2002 proves that the above clauses are not applicable to the assessee's case and Section 28(va) is applicable … the said amendment having been specifically made for the purpose of Sections 48 and 49 dealing with the cost in relation to a capital asset … the assessee emanate out of the order of CIT(A) dt. 30th March, 2004 and pertain to asst. yr. 2000-01. (i) The learned CIT(A) erred in holding that the receipt by the assessee of Rs. 57.84 crores was
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSecy. Federn. of Bus-operators Assn. of T.N. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Chennai
Apr-30-2001
Service TaxMotor Vehicles
Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 35(38), 65, 65(38), 65(48), 65(50), 65(51), 65(52), 66, 66(3) and 67; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2, 2(7), 2(22), 2(25), 2(40), 2(43), 49, 51, 58(1), 58(2), 65, 65(32), 65(38), 65(44), 65(48), 65(50) to 65(52), 65(62), 67, 68, 70, 71, 72, 72(2), 72(9), 73, 74, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87(1), 88(8), 88(9), 88(11), 88(14) and 89; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 63(1), 63(6) and 68; Central Excise Act, 1944; Finance (No. 2) (Amendment) Act, 1996; Finance (No. 2) (Amendment) Act, 1997; Finance (No. 2) (Amendment) Act, 1998; The Haryana Passengers and Goods Taxation Act; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 100; Expenditure Tax Act, 1987; Motor Vehicles Rules - Rule 82 to 85 and 128; Motor Vehicles Permit for All India Tours Rules, 1993; Fina
2001(134)ELT618(Mad); 2006[2]STR411; [2007]6STT49
'tour operators' and requested them to register themselves with the office and follow the procedures prescribed in the Finance Act, 1994 and the rules framed thereunder with effect from 1-4-2000. In all these writ petitions, the contention of … the petitioners do not come within the mischief of the Finance Act, 1994 imposing the 'service tax' vide Section 66 read with Section 65(38) and Section 65(52) and the notice itself is without jurisdiction.3. The petitioners in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLarsen and Toubro Limited Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Jharkhand
Jun-13-2008
Sales Tax/VAT
Bihar Finance Act, 1981 - Sections 2, 13, 17(2), 17(3), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 21, 21(1), 47 and 58; Central Sales Tax Act; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act - Sections 5; Bihar Sales Tax Rules, 1983 - Rules 13, 13A, 15(3) and 18; Rajasthan Sales Tax Rules - Rule 29(2); Sales Tax (Amendment) Rules, 2000 - Rule 13A; Sales Tax (Amendment) Rules, 2006 - Rule 13A
2008(56)BLJR2126; [2008(3)JCR698(Jhr)]; (2009)24VST233(Jharkh)
19(2) of the Bihar Finance Act raising a demand of Rs. 3,42,52,151=00.5. In exercise of power conferred under Section 48 of the Bihar Finance Act 1981, Bihar Sales Tax Rules 1983 was framed which was notified vide Notification … the petitioner challenging the order of re-assessment dated 5/5/2006 passed under Sections 17(3) and 19 of the Bihar Finance Act. The writ petition was dismissed by this Bench on 27/11/2006 holding that the petitioner may avail the statutory … place of earlier rule vide notification No. SO. 43 dated 1st February, 2000. The substituted Rule 13A is quoted herein below:PercentagePercent(1)(a)Earthwork in all types of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCairn Uk Holdings Limited Vs. Director of Income-tax
Delhi
Oct-07-2013
Land Acquisition
proviso to Section 112(1) was applicable to listed securities, units and zero coupon bonds which were included by Finance Act 2000 and 2005. The third proviso to Section 48 introduced by Finance 1997 ordains that nothing contained in the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEstate Late Shri Dharambir Vs. the Dcit [Alongwith Ita Nos. 7279,
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Oct-14-2003
Land Acquisition
(2005)96TTJ(Mum.)880
drawn attention of the A.O on the provisions of Section 45(5) which was introduced w.e.f. 1/4/88 by the Finance Act 1987. The case laws cited before A.O were as follows.However, the A.O was of the view that the … arising from the transfer of capital asset, being a transfer by way of compulsory acquisition, is computed Under Section 48 and such compensation is enhanced by any court or Tribunal etc., the same can be recomputed in accordance
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCybertech Systems and Software Ltd. Vs. Assistant Cit, Range 8(1)
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Nov-30-2005
Direct Taxation
(2006)7SOT230(Mum.)
of computer programmes under section 10B, as it stood prior to its substitution by section 7 of the Finance Act, 2000 (10 of 2000), shall be construed as if for the words'computer programmes', the words'computer programmes or processing or … professional for foreign company and not for development of computer software programme. The discussion in paragraphs 47 and 48 of the aforesaid order of the Tribunal was read out. The Tribunal considered the agreement with CIC to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »