Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2000 section 43 · Page 1 of about 2,178 results (0.058 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 27 2005

Nava Bharat Ferro Alloys Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-27-2005

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 65(7), 65(18A), 65(18B), 65(48), 116 and 117; Finance Act, 1997; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 66 68, 70, 71A and 94; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 68, 68(1), 69, 70, 71 and 71A; Assam Taxation (On Goods Carried by Road or on Inland Waterways) Act; Central Tea Act - Sections 3(1) and 3(2); Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 43, 43(1), 43(1A) and 44; Rajasthan Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1959 - Sections 3 and 4; Karnataka Entertainments Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2; Expenditure Tax Act, 1987; British North America Act, 1867 - Sections 91 and 92; Finance Act, 1998 - Sections 65, 65(16), 65(17), 65(41) and 66(3); Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 84; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rule 2 and 2(1); Service Tax (Amendm

Reported in : (2005)186CTR(AP)451; 2005(185)ELT236(AP); 2006[3]STR565

of service tax by users of clearing and forwarding agents service and users of goods transport service. By Finance Act, 2000, the Parliament amended the provisions for the limited period of 16.7.1997 to 16.10.1998 to enable collection of tax … self assessment of the service tax and the provisions of Section 71 shall apply accordingly.In Finance Act of 2000, Section 117 lays down:117. Validation of certain action taken under Service Tax Rules. - Notwithstanding anything contained in any … and collection of taxes by Act 18 of 1971 legal?Third, is it competent to the legislature to amend Section 43 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 called the 1939 Act by Act 34 of 1971 to include retrospectively

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2010

State of Rajasthan Vs. Uka and ors.,

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-10-2010

Subject : Tenancy

of the judgment given in Asuram v. Tehsildar, Sanchore reported in AIR 2000 Rajasthan 345.2. To understand the issue under consideration, it may be useful … This enactment being enlisted under Schedule IXth is also having protection as per Article 31-B of the Constitution.9. Section 43 of the Act of 1955 provides that a usufructuary mortgage of agricultural land would stand automatically redeemed on … shown that there are certain provisions therein which inhibit the entry of commercial Banks into the field of financing of agriculture. It will, therefore, be necessary to modify these laws for the purpose of enabling commercial banks

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 2001

industrial Machinery Associates Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Decided on : Jan-23-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)81ITD482(Ahd.)

43; and Explanations 1 and 2 above have been substituted in place of the earlier Explanation, by the Finance Act, 2000, w.e.f. the same date on which Section 50B comes into force i.e., 1st April, 2000. With the introduction

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 08 2003

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Tea Agency Trading Centre

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Guwahati

Decided on : Sep-08-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)88ITD96(Gau.)

as mentioned above the amount received from insurance company is not, assessable under the head capital gains.Subsequently by Finance Act, 1999, w.e.f, 1st April, 2000, the money received under the insurance policy was brought to tax as capital … not liable to pay capital gains tax.Now, the issue remains as to whether the assessee's case falls under Section 43 of the IT Act. The Taxation Laws (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1986, has introduced w.e.f. 1st April,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2011

The Commissioner of Income-tax. Vs. Shri Bharat R. RuiA.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-18-2011

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 43(3), 43(5) ; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 2(ac), 2(h), 18A ;

speculative business. 6) Mr. Gupta further submitted that clause (d) inserted to the proviso to Section 43(5) by Finance Act, 2005 specifically provides that with effect from 1/4/2006 exchange permitted derivative transaction shall not be deemed to be … the National Stock Exchange since its inception prior to 2005 amendment. Derivative trading from inception in the year, 2000 has been screen based only. Therefore, the insertion of clause (d) is clarificatory and curative in nature since

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 2007

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Godaveri (Mannar) Sahakari Sakhar K ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-08-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 28, 36, 36(1), 43, 43B, 43(2), 139(1) and 145; Provident Funds Act; Finance Act, 2000; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 21 and 43B; Finance Act, 1983; Finance Act, 1987; Finance Act, 1989

Reported in : (2007)109BOMLR2273; (2007)212CTR(Bom)384; [2008]298ITR149(Bom)

the Revenue their learned Counsel submits that the deletion of the second proviso to Section 43B by the Finance Act 2000 with effect from 1st April, 2004 would only mean that Section 43B as it stands in so far … date of filing of Return of Income ignoring the fact that said amendment to the provisions of Section 43B of the I.T. Act was made with effect from 1st April, 2004 i.e. from Assessment Year 2004-05 and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 10 2003

Coromandel Fertilisers Limited Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Nov-10-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)90ITD344(Hyd.)

by the Courts over the years, has found statutory recognition in Section 2(42C), which was inserted by the Finance Act, 1999 with effect from 1.4.2000. He also invited our attention to Section 50B providing for computation of capital … assessee adopts, it is the obligation of the assessee to pay capital gains under Section 50 read with Section 43(6)(c) of the Income-tax Act. 4. Shri Ashok also pointed out that an assessee cannot be allowed to get

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 2009

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi Vs. Woodward Governor India P. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-08-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28, 29, 30 to 43D, 48, 50, 56, 143, 143(1), 143(2), 144, 145, 145(1), 145(2) and 145(3); Finance Act, 2002; Companies Act - Sections 209; Finance Act, 1967

Reported in : (2009)223CTR(SC)1; [2009]312ITR254(SC); JT2009(5)SC378; 2009(5)SCALE198; (2009)13SCC1; [2009]179TAXMAN326(SC); 2009(3)LC1519(SC); [2009] 5 SCR 738

cases, we are required to consider the provisions of Section 43(1), 43A (both, before and after Amendment vide Finance Act, 2002).Facts in M/s Woodward Governor India P. Ltd.[Civil Appeal arising out of SLP(C) No. 593/08]- REVENUE ACCOUNT CASE:5.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2016

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Dharampal Satyapal

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-06-2016

Subject : Direct Taxation

of section 3 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (1 of 1986). ? 25. The Finance Act, 2000 substituted the aforesaid Explanation by Explanation 1 and 2 which are quoted hereinbefore. The purpose of the Explanations … of the undertaking, depreciation allowable under sub-item (C) of item (i) of sub-clause (c) of clause (6) of Section 43 of the Act (hereafter, for the sake of brevity, referred to as 'Clause C') for the AY 2000-01

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2005

Mafatlal Industries Ltd. Vs. S.A. Chemicals

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-20-2005

Subject : Company

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1), 15, 15(1), 17(3), 18, 18(3), 18(5), 18(8), 18(9), 18(10), 18(12), 19(1), 19(2) and 22(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433 and 434; Income Tax Act

Reported in : [2005]127CompCas711(Guj); (2005)6CompLJ293(Guj); [2005]62SCL97(Guj)

that the respective Company Petitions, namely, Company Petition Nos. 263 of 2000, 43 of 2000 and 259 of 1999 filed by the different petitioning Creditors … Scheme for rehabilitation of the applicant Company in Case No. 104 of 2000 by Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (For short 'BIFR').3. Company Petition No. 263 of 2000 is filed by the petitioning Creditor, namely, M/s. … of 1999 in view of the provisions contained in Section 22(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special provisions) Act, 1985 (SICA) and for termination and/or suspension of the order passed by this Court in Company Application No.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial