Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2000 section 36 · Page 1 of about 2,796 results (0.078 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 08 2007

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Godaveri (Mannar) Sahakari Sakhar K ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-08-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 28, 36, 36(1), 43, 43B, 43(2), 139(1) and 145; Provident Funds Act; Finance Act, 2000; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 21 and 43B; Finance Act, 1983; Finance Act, 1987; Finance Act, 1989

Reported in : (2007)109BOMLR2273; (2007)212CTR(Bom)384; [2008]298ITR149(Bom)

the Revenue their learned Counsel submits that the deletion of the second proviso to Section 43B by the Finance Act 2000 with effect from 1st April, 2004 would only mean that Section 43B as it stands in so far … to employer's contribution while the deduction in respect of employees contribution would be governed by the provisions of Section 36(1)(va);(ii) The deduction in respect of employers contribution is to be allowed if the payment has been made by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 2002

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Bank of Rajasthan Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-14-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 1986 - Sections 36(1); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 36(1) and (2)

Reported in : [2002]255ITR599(Raj)

the assessment year 1987-88.2. This court admitted the appeal on the following question of law :'Whether after the Finance Act, 1985, amending the provisions of Section 36(l)(vii) and Section 36(2) with effect from April 1,1985, inserting a proviso … had not attained the age of eighteen years - It is with the enactment of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000, that in Section 2(k) a juvenile or child was defined to mean a child who had not completed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 2006

All India State Bank Officers Federation and State Bank of India Offic ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-13-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24), 4, 5(1), 10, 10(14), 10(26), 14, 15, 16, 17(1), 17(2), 17(3), 80B, 80CCD, 80D and 119 - Schedule - Rules 6, 11(2) and 11(4); Finance Act, 1988; Finance Act, 2000; Coal Mines Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1948 - Sections 3G; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 6C; Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1) and 36(1); Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 4(3) and 7(1); Madras General Sales Tax Act - Sections 5; Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 21

Reported in : (2006)206CTR(Bom)562; [2007]288ITR614(Bom)

him free of cost or at concessional rate for the purposes of this Sub-clause; (iiia) [Omitted by the Finance Act, 2000 w.e.f. 1-4-2001] (iv) any sum paid by the employer in respect of any obligation which, but for such … seek to challenge the constitutional validity of the latter part of Clause (v) of the first proviso to Section 17(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [appearing in the section after Clause (vi)] to the extent it … 1999) for the purposes of Clause (ib) of Sub-section (1) of Section 36;(iv) any sum paid by the employer in respect of any premium paid

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 21 2001

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-ii, New Delhi Vs. Motor General ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(2), 36(1), 115J, 119, 139(1), (4), 140A, 140A(1), 142(1), 143, 143(1), (3), 144, 147, 148, 154, 155, 156, 208, 210, 234A, 234B, 234C, 245D(1), (3), (4), 250, 254, 256(2), 260, 260A, 262, 263 and 264; DTL (Amendment) Act, 1987; DLT (Amendment) Act, 1989; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 2; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2000; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2001; Evidence Act - Sections 114

Reported in : [2002]254ITR449(Delhi)

Matched in: Parties The Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-ii, New Delhi Vs. Motor General Finance Ltd.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 2005

Kiran Corpn. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Decided on : Nov-24-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)98ITD119(Ahd.)

under Section 36(1)(vii) would be treated as complied with.However, Explanation has been inserted below Section 36(1)(vii) by the Finance Act, 2001 with effect from 1-4-1989 which provides that any provision for bad and doubtful debt would not qualify … Ahmedabad Bench of Tribunal in the case of Patel Bros. v.Dy. CIT [IT Appeal No. 2326 (Ahd.) of 2000, dated 7-2-2000] in which one of us (AM) was a party. In this decision, after detailed review of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 2004

Maruti Udyog Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-11-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2005]92ITD120(Delhi)

The legislature made retrospective amendment to section 28 of the Act by inserting clauses (iiia) to (iiic) by Finance Act, 1990 with effect from 1-4-1962. Thus, income by way of duty drawback became taxable income by virtue of … per assessed's formula would come to 2200 components (500 + 2500 - 800) as against actual consumption of 2000 components (20 X 100). This difference of 200 components, unless explained by the assessed in a satisfactory manner, … at ; (ii) that the assessed is entitled to deduction under section 36(1)(iii) and section 14A does not take away such right of assessed; (iii)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2016

C.I.T and Anr Vs. M/S Yokogawa India Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-16-2016

Subject : Direct Taxation

of Section 10A, as amended, which could be suggestive of the fact that by the amendment made by Finance Act, 2000, Section 10A had changed its colour from being an exemption section to a provision providing for deduction. Yet, Section … assessment year,- section 32, section 32A, section 33, section 35 and clause (ix) of sub- section (1) of section 36 shall apply as if every allowance or deduction referred to therein and relating to or allowable for any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 2005

Wallfort Shares and Stock Brokers Vs. Income-tax Officer [Alongwith

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-15-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

House of Lords in the case of Lupton. In that case forward stripping had been banned by the Finance Act, 1960, but the House of Lords did not think that the subsequent amendment should prejudice or cloud the … the Finance Act, 2001 with retrospective effect from 1.4.1962; Explanation to Section 36(1)(viii) by Finance Act, 1992 with retrospective effect from 1.4.1987 and so on. … the case of the assessee in relation to assessment orders Under Section 143(3) for assessment years 2001-2002 and 2000-2001 respectively. These appeals have been referred to us as a Special Bench to decide the following issues:- 1.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 2006

Merit Enterprises Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Apr-26-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)288ITR226(Hyd.)

in Part III of First Schedule of the Finance Act, 1999, have also been correspondingly introduced in the Finance Act, 2000, in Part I of the First Schedule, so as to make it applicable to assessment year 2000-2001 which … reference arises out of the appeal, against the assessment order passed by the DCIT, Central Circle-I, Hyderabad under Section 158BC of the Income-tax Act for the block period from 1.4.1989 to 18.11.1999, dated Nil, stated in the … the Tribunal in Friends Overseas (P) Ltd. v. DCIT (2001) 73 TTJ 367 (Del.), which is to the contrary effect. In that decision, the Tribunal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2000

Allahabad Bank Vs. Canara Bank and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-10-2000

Subject : BankingCompany

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 19, 232(1), 442, 445, 446, 529A and 537; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 25 and 34; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 and 323A; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 5; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980 - Sections 3; Industrial Finance Corporation Act, 1948; State Financial Corporations Act, 1951; Unit Trust of India Act, 1963; Industrial Reconstruction Bank of India Act, 1984; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1960; Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 15 and 41; Old Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 171; Banking Companies Act, 1949 - Sections 45C; Civil Procedure

Reported in : 2000(3)ALLMR(SC)475; 2000(2)CTC723; JT2000(4)SC411; 2000(3)SCALE169; (2000)4SCC406; [2000]2SCR1102; AIR 2000 SC 1535; MANU/SC/0262/2000

Matched in: Citation 2000(3)ALLMR(SC)475; 2000(2)CTC723; JT2000(4)SC411; 2000(3)SCALE169; (2000)4SCC406; [2000]2SCR1102; AIR 2000 SC 1535; MANU/SC/0262/2000

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial