Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2000 section 32 · Page 1 of about 3,155 results (0.075 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 16 2016

C.I.T and Anr Vs. M/S Yokogawa India Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-16-2016

Subject : Direct Taxation

of Section 10A, as amended, which could be suggestive of the fact that by the amendment made by Finance Act, 2000, Section 10A had changed its colour from being an exemption section to a provision providing for deduction. Yet, Section … the last of the relevant assessment years, or of any previous year, relevant to any subsequent assessment year,- section 32, section 32A, section 33, section 35 and clause (ix) of sub- section (1) of section 36 shall apply

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 2001

Unit Trust of India, Mumbai and anr. Vs. P.K. Unny and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-19-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Interest Tax Act, 1974 - Sections 2, 2(5), 2(7), 3(1), 3(1C), 3(2), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 6, 6(2), 7, 9, 9(1), 10, 10A, 18, 21, 26C, 28 and 119; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(7A), 2(24), 2(28A), 2(45), 4, 5, 5A, 14, 15, 16, 24, 40, 43D, 44, 44AD, 44D, 115J, 116, 119 and 147; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 4A; Finance Act, 1991; State Financial Corporations Act; Finance Act, 1988; Hotel Receipts Tax Act, 1980; Finance Act, 1980; Unit Trust of India Act, 1963 - Sections 9(2),19(1)(3), 19(3), 21, 22 to 25B, 25B(1) and 25B(2), 32, 32(1) and 52; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987; Finance Act, 2000; Unite Trust of India (Amendment) Act, 1966 - Sections 2(1); Wealth Tax Act, 1957; Super Profit-tax Act, 1963; Companies (Profit) Surtax Act, 1964; Rent Control Act; Public Premises

Reported in : 2001(3)BomCR673; 2002(1)MhLj301

stated above, since 1991, the market borrowings of the Central Government have increased manifold times and, therefore, by Finance Act, 2000 the levy has been withdrawn after 31-3-2000. During the Accounting Year ending 31-3-2001, Government of India had to … clarification from CBDT whether UTI was liable to interest tax under the said Act, 1974 in view of Section 32 of the UTI Act. On 11th October, 1991 CBDT addressed a letter dated 11th October 1991 to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2006

Jindal thermal Power Company Limited (Formerly Jindal Tracteble Power ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-31-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 10, 10A, 10B, 11, 12, 80HHC, 80HHC(3), 80HHF(3), 112, 113, 115A, 115AA, 115AB, 115ACA, 115AD, 115B, 115BB, 115BBA, 115E, 115JB, 119(2), 140A, 154, 161(1A), 164, 164A, 167B, 172(4), 174(2), 175, 176(2), 192, 207, 208 to 219, 234A, 234B and 234C; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 115J, 115J(1), 115JA, 115JB(1) and 115JB; Finance Act, 1987; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1996; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections115B and 115JB; Finance (Amendment) Act, 2000; Finance (Amendment) Act, 2002; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 210; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3, 17(1), 32(2), 32A(3), 72(1), 73, 74, 74A(3), 139(1), 142(1) and 288(2); Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 2(8); Constitution of India - Articles 265 and 300A

Reported in : (2006)203CTR(Kar)381; [2006]286ITR182(KAR); [2006]286ITR182(Karn)

Matched in: Parties Jindal thermal Power Company Limited (Formerly Jindal Tracteble Power Co. Ltd.) Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and Union of India (Uoi) R/by Its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 08 2017

Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Co.Ltd. Vs. Dy.Commr. of I.T.Mumbai and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-08-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

The learned Tribunal held that sub-sections (2) and (3) of Section 14A of the Act (inserted by the Finance Act, 2006 with effect from 1st April, 2007) were retrospectively applicable to the Assessment Year 2002-2003 and, therefore, the … on distributed income to unit holders.- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other provisions of this Act and section 32 of the Unit Trust of India Act, 1963 (52 of 1963), any amount of income distributed on or … said appellate order(s) had also attained finality. For the intervening Assessment Year 2000-2001 there was no scrutiny of the appellant's return of income. Consequently, the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 21 2007

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Pioneer Asia Packing (P) Limited

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-21-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act - Sections 32(2) and 148; Finance Act, 1996

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(Mad)202; [2009]310ITR198(Mad)

against any other head of income and could be carried forward individually. But as per the amendment under Finance Act, 1996 w.e.f. 01.04.1997 the cumulated unabsorbed depreciation brought forward as on 01.04.1997 could be set off against the … of the assessing officer for verification, even though the law laid down by clear and unambiguous words in Section 32(2), is applicable to the assessment year 2000-01?3. We heard the argument of the learned Counsel for the revenue

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 2001

Ram Nath Jindal Vs. Cit

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-19-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)170CTR(P& H)251

has not been claimed by the assessee. This position is further obvious from the fact that in the Finance Act, 2001, Explnation 5 has been inserted in section 32(1)(ii) with effect from 1-4-2002. It has been inter alia

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2006

Greenply Industries Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-22-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)(111)ECC151

116 & 117 read as under: Section 116 and 117 of the Finance Act, 2000 Amendment of Act 32 of 1994. 116. During the period commencing on and from the 16th day of July, 1997 and ending … Learned Advocate appearing for the appellants submits that the amendment carried out by Section 116 and 117 of Finance Act, 2000 was to bring the GTO services into net of service tax and to validate any action taken for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2006

Slocum Investment (P) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-24-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)101TTJ(Delhi)558

XIV-B of the Act. These are contained in Chapter IV to Chapter XII-G of the Act. Prior to Finance Act, 2002, amending Section 158BB(1), w.r.e.f. 1st July, 1995, only provisions of Chapter IV were applicable while computing undisclosed … Certificates. Therefore, there was a completed sale of the shares in the previous year relevant to asst. yr. 2000-01, i.e., financial year 1999-2000, by the assessee, M/s SNIPL and M/s HCLCL respectively. Prior to this sale, M/s … of the shares of NIIT was worked out by him at Rs. 320 based on the discussion with Alex Brown & Sons, the leading investment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2006

Slocum Investment P. Ltd. (Now Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-24-2006

Subject : Service Tax

XIV-B of the Act. These are contained in Chapter IV to Chapter XII-G of the Act. Prior to Finance Act, 2002, amending Section 158 BB(1) with retrospective effect from 1.7.95 only provisions of Chapter IV were applicable while … shares in the month of November 1999.3. The Assessee filed its return of income for the Assessment Year 2000-2001 on 30.11.2000. A copy of the acknowledgement of filing return of income for the Assessment Year 2000-01 on … of the shares of NUT was worked out by him at Rs. 320/- based on the discussion with Alex Brown & Sons, the leading investment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 2008

Ksl and Industries Ltd. Vs. Arihant Threads Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-25-2008

Subject : SICABanking

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 3, 15 to 19, 19A, 20, 21, 22, 22(1), 22A, 25, 29, 32 and 32(1); Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 25, 28, 29, 30, 34, 34(1) and 34(2); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 72A; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 529(1) and 529A; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976; Industrial Finance Corporation Act, 1948; State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 29 and 46B; Unit Trust of India Act, 1963; Industrial Reconstruction Bank of India Act, 1984; Small Industries Development Bank of India Act, 1989; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions (Amendment) Act, 2000;

Reported in : IV(2008)BC421(SC); 153(2008)DLT27(SC); 2008(12)SCALE42; (2008)9SCC763

In paragraph 30 of the decision, it was inter alia observed;Furthermore, Section 30, after amendment by the Amendment Act, 2000, gives a right to any person aggrieved by an order of the Recovery Officer, to prefer an appeal … Singhvi, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, namely that the proceedings are barred by Section 22 read with Section 32 of the SICA.(emphasis supplied)18. Referring to the relevant provisions of SICA and keeping in view the ratio laid … was the predecessor of the Stressed Assets Stabilisation Fund (`SASF' for short), financed the project undertaken by the Company by way of foreign currency loan

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial