Advanced Search Results

State of Kerala & Another versus Asianet Satellite Communications ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2215

this case, the writ petitions were filed challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 116 and 117 of the Finance Act, 2000 and Section 158 of the Finance Act, 2003 by which the decision of this Court in Laghu Udhyog … on trade, profession or calling, falling within the scope of Entry 60 - List II read with Article 276 of the Constitution of India. c. The transmission through the Cable Television Network is not only of films

indo-nippon Chemicals Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and o ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 11B, 11B(1) and 11B(2); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57F; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 to 24 and 29(2)

Reported in : 2002(82)ECC657; 2005(185)ELT19(Guj); (2002)3GLR8

out that it is only after insertion of Section 2A to the Act by Section 91 of the Finance Act, 2000 with effect from 12-5-2000 that reference to the expressions 'duty of excise' or 'duty' will prospectively be construed

Merit Enterprises Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)288ITR226(Hyd.)

in Part III of First Schedule of the Finance Act, 1999, have also been correspondingly introduced in the Finance Act, 2000, in Part I of the First Schedule, so as to make it applicable to assessment year 2000-2001 which … reference arises out of the appeal, against the assessment order passed by the DCIT, Central Circle-I, Hyderabad under Section 158BC of the Income-tax Act for the block period from 1.4.1989 to 18.11.1999, dated Nil, stated in the … the brief facts of the case by the assessee as completed on 27.4.2001, filed with the Tribunal on 13.12.2001, challenging the levy of surcharge of

initiating Explosives Systems Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2008)9STR509

for collecting the service tax, are ultra vires the Act itself. The said sub-rules are accordingly quashed". However Finance Act, 2000 made validation of certain action taken under Service Rules through Sections 116 and 117 of the said Act … and not for abrogating it. The said enactments including Section 11B of Central Excises and Salt Act and Section 27 of the Customs Act do constitute "law" within the meaning of Article 265 of the Constitution of India

Fabworth (India) Ltd. and Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2002)(147)ELT478Tri(Mum.)bai

proviso to Section 3(1) of the Central Excise Act, as it stood prior to its amendment by the Finance Act 2000, reads as under:- Provided that the duties of excise which shall be levied and collected on any excisable … and appeal Nos. E/929 to 933/98 preferred against Order-in-Original No. 59-61/95 dated 9.11.95 and Order-in-Original No. 111-115/97 dated 27.11.97 respectively, of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur. M/s woolworth (India) Limited [in short, WOOLWORTH] are the appellants

The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Maha Laxmi Sugar Mills Company ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2008)219CTR(Uttranchal)393

shall be treated as service provider (assessee), and not the Clearing Agent or customer.Thereafter, Section 117 of the Finance Act, 2000, came into force w.e.f. 1st April 2000, whereby certain action taken under service tax rules since the commencement … assessee for violating the provisions of Section 70 of the Finance Act, 1994. Aggrieved by said order dated 27.01.2004, passed by Commissioner, Central Excise, Appeal No. ST/69/04-NB(S) was preferred by the respondent-assessee before the CESTAT, who vide

J.K. Cement Works Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Central Excise and Custom ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B and 11BB

Reported in : 2004(97)ECC6; 2004(170)ELT4(Raj); RLW2004(4)Raj2604; 2004(3)WLC757

of payment of Duty and not the date of determination about excess payment of Duty. Until substituted vide Finance Act, 2000, any claimant, to refund was required to make an application before expiry of six months from the relevant … payable to the petitioner and not liable to be transferred to Consumer Welfare Fund under Sub-section (2) of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944.2. Journey to this lis started with making of two applications by

Ranjit Kumar Sinha Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

Member­ Secretary of the Board (d) Secretary to Government of Bihar, Housing Department or the representative­ ex­officio (e) Finance Commissioner or a representative nominated by him who will not be an officer below the rank of Special … and 23 of the Jharkhand State Housing Board Act, 2000 must be noticed, first. Jharkhand State Housing Board Act, 2000 Section 4. Constitution of the Board ­(1) The Board shall consist of the following members, namely:­ (a) a Chairman … W.P.(C).No.4270/2011 and, in the mean­time, the respondent­Managing Director issued show­cause notice dated 27.02.2015 for cancellation of the allotment. The petitioner challenged the show­cause notice dated

M/S Kamla Aditya Construction Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

wholly without jurisdiction, in as much as, Section 24(3)(b) and Section 27 of the Jharkhand State Housing Board Act, 2000 are not applicable in the facts of the present case. A further prayer has been made seeking quashing … Games­ 2007, a meeting was held on 24.09.2004 in presence of the then Chief Minister­Housing Minister, Development Commissioner, Finance Secretary, Housing Secretary, Managing Director of Jharkhand State Housing Board and others. In the said meeting, a decision

Excel Venture Construction Co. Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

wholly without jurisdiction, in as much as, Section 24(3)(b) and Section 27 of the Jharkhand State Housing Board Act, 2000 are not applicable in the facts of the present case. A further prayer has been made seeking quashing … Games­ 2007, a meeting was held on 24.09.2004 in presence of the then Chief Minister­Housing Minister, Development Commissioner, Finance Secretary, Housing Secretary, Managing Director of Jharkhand State Housing Board and others. In the said meeting, a decision