Advanced Search Results

Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Uttamchand V. Sethiya

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

1990-91 to 1999-2000 in light of the provisions contained in Part I of the First Schedule to the Finance Act, 2000?" 2. The assessee firm is engaged in the business of land development and related activities. A search and … A search and seizure operation was carried out at the residential and business premises of the assessee under section 132 of the Act. The assessee filed return for the block period within 45 days of receipt of … of CIT v. Vatika Township (P.) Ltd. [2014] 367 ITR 466/227 Taxman 121/49 taxmann.com 249 wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held as under: 'The

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the … 380); (b) Member, Board of Revenue, West Bengal Vs. M/s.Phelps and Co.(P) Ltd., (1972) 4 Supreme Court Cases 121; (c) CC, Kolkata Vs. Rupa and Co. Ltd., (2004(170) E.L.T. 129 (S.C.)) (d) Indian Farmers Fertilisers Co-op. Ltd.

Surana Metals and Steels (i) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2006)(109)ECC6

dated 1-3-2001. Section 3A of the Central Excise Act was omitted by Parliament under Section 121 of the Finance Act, 2001, which came into force on 11-5-2001.Thus Rules 96ZO and 96ZP were omitted with effect from 1-3-2001 and

Durga Steel Rolling Mills Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Pvt. Ltd wherein the Division Bench has held as under: Hence, in absence of any saving clause in Section 121 or any other Section of the Finance Act, 2001 or in the central Excise Act, 1944, the pending … Section 3-A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. I find these provisions omitted from the Statue in the Finance Act w.e.f.11.5.2001. If the provisions of Section 3-A are omitted from the Statue from 11.5.01, the proceedings initiated under … of Central Excise Rules for the month of December, 1999 to February, 2000. The appellants did not discharge the duty liability for three months. Show

Kanoria Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Karnataka

Subject : ExciseCivil

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57A, 57B and 57C to 57V; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 112; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2005(190)ELT295(Kar)

remains.3. However, the communication dated 19-6-2000 being on the premise that in terms of Section 112 of the Finance Act, 2000, such Modvat credit having been disallowed, the petitioner was advised to reverse the entry and it is only … of events also are fitted in and the duration of calendar of events is part of this programme. Section 121: [D.V. Shylendra Kumar,J] Exemption from provisions of Act - Power of the State Government Held, Power conferred on

Upload Objection List Dated 25.05.2026 TO 04.06.2026

Court : National Company Law Tribunal NCLT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Objections: -** 1. Bookmarking with proper page numbering is mandatory. 21 6/2/2026 Company Petition IB (IBC) 710102044912026 BAJAJ FINANCE LIMITED VS Kindly provide bookmarking in accordance with the index and pagination. 2. Kindly SWASTIK PIPE LIMITED mention … PRIVATE LIMITEDIBC Under Sec 9 5/26/2026 Shivam 4 5/25/2026 CA(A) Merger and 710102042772026 GOPAL CORPCO LIMITED VS Amalgamation(Companies Act) CAPABLE BUILDWELL PRIVATE No. of Objections: - 1. Case type is wrong in PDF. Kindly correct it as … Of Filing Case Type Dairy No. MAIN CASE NO Title Of Case Section Scrutiny Comments Filed By Date 1 4/9/2026 Company Petition IB (IBC) 710102026842026 … 1131, RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL OF 25(2)(j), 1135-1142, 1150, 1153, 1175, 1180-1185, 1190, 1191, 1216-1221, 1226, 1233, 1262, 1263, VEER CHEMICALS PVT LTD AND 43,45,47,50,60( 1299, 1300,

industrial Development Bank of India Ltd. and Others Vs. the Deputy Co ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

fail in attempts to claim priority or first charge. Impact of new provisions By Section 66 of the Finance Act, 2011, a new provision i.e., Section 11E is inserted in the Central Excise Act. For ready reference we … of Annaram Village of Narsapur Mandal in Medak District as collateral security. In 1999, IDBI instituted O.A.No.497 of 2000 before the DRT, Hyderabad, under Section 19(1) of the DRT Act. It was decreed on 12.4.2005 for Rs.3.86 … 2007 Mad 118(1), Union of India v SICOM Ltd. (2009) 2 SCC 121 : (2009) 233 ELT 433,Central Bank of India (2) v State of

Union Of India Vs. M/s. B.t. Patil And Sons Belgaum (construction) Pvt ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Customs Act, Section 37 of the Central Excise Act and Section 93A read with Section 94 of the Finance Act, 1994, the Central Government has made a set of rules called the Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service … the supplier in Indian 17 rupees but the supplies earned or saved foreign exchange for the country.21. Under Section 121 (f), supply of goods to projects financed by multilateral or bilateral agencies, such as, the International Bank for

H.B. Stockholdings Ltd. Vs. Joint Cit

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)87TTJ(Del)127

addition was sustained.4.2 The ground of the assessed in regard to surcharge was also dismissed by observing that Finance Act, 1999 provides for imposition of surcharge over and above the tax computed under section 113. Accordingly the levy

Shri M. Irshad Ali, Shri K.T. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Chennai

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2002)(80)ECC363

car broker and he had nothing to do with the import of this car.He did not either provide finance for buying the car or purchased the car himself nor used Shri Azizur Rehman's name for importing into … Bombay high Court rendered in GOPAL MAYAJI PARAB Vs T.C.SETH reported in 2000 (126) ELT 102 (Bom.) and that of RADHA KISHAN BHATIA Vs UOI … Nazeerudeen.This amount represented sale proceeds of the Car in question and appeared liable for confiscation under provisions of Section 121 of the Customs Act, 1962. (i) S/Shri Shaikh Azizur Rehman and M.Nazeerudeen Adbudl Razack having involved themselves in