Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2000 section 119 · Page 1 of about 642 results (0.040 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 13 2001

Shree Fats and Proteins Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-13-2001

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 119 and 120; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 9, 9(2), 9(2A) and 9(2B); Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 29, 37, 53, 58, 70 and 70(2); Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 - Sections 12; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 23(3); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 19(1)

Reported in : [2006]146STC310(Raj)

numbering 29, the petitioners have challenged the provisions of Sub-clause (2)(d) of the validation Clause 120 of the Finance Act, 2000 (Act No. 10 of 2000) be declared to be violative of Articles 14 and 19(l)(g) of the Constitution … pay arises.16. Mr. Alok Sharma has further contended that the demands for interest in terms of provision of Section 119 and Section 120 of the Finance Act cannot be made by way of rectification beyond the limitation provided

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 2009

indodan Industries Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-20-2009

Subject : Sales Tax/Vat

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 9, 9(1), 9(2) and 9(2B); Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 119, 120 and 120(2); General Sales Tax Law

Reported in : 2009(13)SCALE421; 2009(10)LC4845(SC)

1956 (hereinafter referred to as 1956 Act). On 12th May, 2000, Finance Act 2000 came into force. Vide Section 119 of the Finance Act, 2000, Sub-section (2B) came to be inserted in Section 9 of the 1956 Act. … on 12th May, 2000 by the Finance Act of 2000 is retrospective? and(2) Whether Section 120 of the Finance Act, 2000 which was a validating Act was invalid inasmuch as it purports to validate a provision which had never

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2006

Jindal thermal Power Company Limited (Formerly Jindal Tracteble Power ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-31-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 10, 10A, 10B, 11, 12, 80HHC, 80HHC(3), 80HHF(3), 112, 113, 115A, 115AA, 115AB, 115ACA, 115AD, 115B, 115BB, 115BBA, 115E, 115JB, 119(2), 140A, 154, 161(1A), 164, 164A, 167B, 172(4), 174(2), 175, 176(2), 192, 207, 208 to 219, 234A, 234B and 234C; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 115J, 115J(1), 115JA, 115JB(1) and 115JB; Finance Act, 1987; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1996; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections115B and 115JB; Finance (Amendment) Act, 2000; Finance (Amendment) Act, 2002; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 210; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3, 17(1), 32(2), 32A(3), 72(1), 73, 74, 74A(3), 139(1), 142(1) and 288(2); Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 2(8); Constitution of India - Articles 265 and 300A

Reported in : (2006)203CTR(Kar)381; [2006]286ITR182(KAR); [2006]286ITR182(Karn)

Matched in: Parties Jindal thermal Power Company Limited (Formerly Jindal Tracteble Power Co. Ltd.) Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and Union of India (Uoi) R/by Its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 31 2002

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Azadi Bachao Andolan and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-31-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 5, 6, 7, 10(1), 44, 51, 73, 90, 115A, 116, 119, 119(1), 119(2), 245O, 245S and 245R; Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964; Evidence Act; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 49A; Finance Act, 1972; Finance Act, 1991 - 90(1) and 90(2); Constitution of India - Articles 1, 2(2), 3, 4, 4.1, 4(3), 10, 11, 12, 13, 13(4), 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 18(2), 20, 21, 22, 25, 28, 31B, 73 and 265; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 5A; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 8(5); Customs Act - Sections 25; Economic Crime and Anti Money Laundering Act, 2000; Companies Act, 1984; Stock Exchange Act, 1988; Income Tax Law; Income and Corporation Taxes Act, 1970 - Sections 460; Wealth Tax Act - Sections 21(2)

Reported in : (2004)1CompLJ50(SC); (2003)184CTR(SC)450; [2003]263ITR707(SC); JT2003(Suppl2)SC205; 2003(8)SCALE287; (2004)10SCC1

1961 was introduced, Section 90 contained therein initially was a reproduction of Section 49A of 1922 Act. The Finance Act, 1972 (Act 16 of 1972) modified Section 90 and brought it into force with effect from 1.4.1972. The … shares without being subjected to tax in India. Sometime in the year 2000, some of the income tax authorities issued show cause notices to some … accepted the contention before it that the said circular is ultra vires the provisions of Section 90 and Section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and also otherwise bad and illegal. 3.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2001

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-ii, New Delhi Vs. Motor General ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(2), 36(1), 115J, 119, 139(1), (4), 140A, 140A(1), 142(1), 143, 143(1), (3), 144, 147, 148, 154, 155, 156, 208, 210, 234A, 234B, 234C, 245D(1), (3), (4), 250, 254, 256(2), 260, 260A, 262, 263 and 264; DTL (Amendment) Act, 1987; DLT (Amendment) Act, 1989; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 2; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2000; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2001; Evidence Act - Sections 114

Reported in : [2002]254ITR449(Delhi)

Matched in: Parties The Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-ii, New Delhi Vs. Motor General Finance Ltd.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 2001

Unit Trust of India, Mumbai and anr. Vs. P.K. Unny and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-19-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Interest Tax Act, 1974 - Sections 2, 2(5), 2(7), 3(1), 3(1C), 3(2), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 6, 6(2), 7, 9, 9(1), 10, 10A, 18, 21, 26C, 28 and 119; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(7A), 2(24), 2(28A), 2(45), 4, 5, 5A, 14, 15, 16, 24, 40, 43D, 44, 44AD, 44D, 115J, 116, 119 and 147; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 4A; Finance Act, 1991; State Financial Corporations Act; Finance Act, 1988; Hotel Receipts Tax Act, 1980; Finance Act, 1980; Unit Trust of India Act, 1963 - Sections 9(2),19(1)(3), 19(3), 21, 22 to 25B, 25B(1) and 25B(2), 32, 32(1) and 52; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987; Finance Act, 2000; Unite Trust of India (Amendment) Act, 1966 - Sections 2(1); Wealth Tax Act, 1957; Super Profit-tax Act, 1963; Companies (Profit) Surtax Act, 1964; Rent Control Act; Public Premises

Reported in : 2001(3)BomCR673; 2002(1)MhLj301

stated above, since 1991, the market borrowings of the Central Government have increased manifold times and, therefore, by Finance Act, 2000 the levy has been withdrawn after 31-3-2000. During the Accounting Year ending 31-3-2001, Government of India had to … to follow orders, instructions and directions of the Board. He contended that Section 3(2) is differently worded from Section 119. He contended that Section 21 of the Interest Tax Act separately provides for application of Section 119 also

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2001

M/S Matsushita Lakhanpal Battery Vs. Cce, Indore

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Apr-04-2001

Subject : Service Tax

the period from 16.03.95 to 12.05.2000 is admissible by virtue of Clause 1 of Section 112 of the Finance Act, 2000. In the instant case, the credit on HSD oil was taken in 1998. Hence such credit is not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 2004

Shree Jagannath Packers and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-14-2004

Subject : CivilSales Tax

Acts : Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 6, 7 and 12; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 8(5) and 13(3); State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29; Orissa General Clauses Act, 1937 - Sections 22; Punjab General Clauses Act, 1898 - Sections 19; Bihar Finance Act - Sections 7; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25 and 25(1); Electricity Supply Act - Sections 49; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 - Sections 4(2); East Punjab Public Safety Act - Sections 20 and 36(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21; Central Sales Tax (Deferment of Payment of Taxes) Orissa Rules, 1990; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 154(1), 154(2), 161, 162 and 166(3)

Reported in : [2005]141STC26(Orissa)

2 SCC 502 and Dai-Ichi Karkaria Ltd. v. Union of India (2000) 119 ELT 516 (SC).14. Mr. Das further submitted that the sales tax incentives … that a notification issued by the State Government in exercise of powers under Section 7 of the Bihar Finance Act to the extent it is repugnant to the Industrial Policy Resolution of the Government of Bihar is bad. … the aforesaid benefits of exemption from sales tax for a period of seven years up to September 11, 2000. The petitioner enjoyed the said benefits of sales tax exemption from September 11, 1993 but on July 30,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2009

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Oscar Laboratories (P) Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-26-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2009)222CTR(P& H)546

appeals, were granted statutory status with the insertion of Section 268A into the IT Act, 1961, by the Finance Act, 2008 with retrospective effect from 1st April, 1999. The second contention advanced by the learned Counsel for the … raised by the respondent-assessee, the Tribunal vide its order dt. 25th Sept., 2000 recalled the ex parte order passed by it on 18th Nov., 1999.4. … the Tribunal.10. In the sequence of facts noticed hereinabove, reference in the first instance, must be made to Section 119 of the 1961 Act, whereunder the CBDT was authorised to issue orders, instructions or directions to IT authorities

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 17 2005

Abn Amro Bank Nv Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-17-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)96TTJ(Kol.)1041

contrary view overruling the Tribunal decision considering the Explanation to Section 90(2) of the Act, inserted by the Finance Act, 2001." 39. The relevant facts relating to this issue are that the AO had levied tax in this … has been modified by the Board vide subsequent letter dt. 24th March, 2000. It has been clarified therein that action could be taken by the … contended that even the letters issued by the Board are considered as circulars having a binding force under Section 119 of the IT Act, 1961. It was further contended that the withdrawal of the circular issued by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial