Advanced Search Results

Jindal thermal Power Company Limited (Formerly Jindal Tracteble Power ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 10, 10A, 10B, 11, 12, 80HHC, 80HHC(3), 80HHF(3), 112, 113, 115A, 115AA, 115AB, 115ACA, 115AD, 115B, 115BB, 115BBA, 115E, 115JB, 119(2), 140A, 154, 161(1A), 164, 164A, 167B, 172(4), 174(2), 175, 176(2), 192, 207, 208 to 219, 234A, 234B and 234C; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 115J, 115J(1), 115JA, 115JB(1) and 115JB; Finance Act, 1987; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1996; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections115B and 115JB; Finance (Amendment) Act, 2000; Finance (Amendment) Act, 2002; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 210; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3, 17(1), 32(2), 32A(3), 72(1), 73, 74, 74A(3), 139(1), 142(1) and 288(2); Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 2(8); Constitution of India - Articles 265 and 300A

Reported in : (2006)203CTR(Kar)381; [2006]286ITR182(KAR); [2006]286ITR182(Karn)

seemingly comparable to Section 115JA. The new provision viz., Section 115JB was brought into the statute by the Finance Act, 2000 effective from assessment year 2001-02. It was materially different from its predecessor in one respect- in not seeking … relates to the demand pertaining to levying of interest under Section 234-B and 234-C of Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') aggregating to Rs. 71,12,704/- for the assessment year 2001-02 for the alleged default in

itw Signode India Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9(2), 10, 12, 12A, 173, 173(1), 173(2), 173(4), 173B, 173B(2), 173B(5) and 173C; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 4 and 11A; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 110; Validating Act

Reported in : 2003(90)ECC757; 2003LC783(SC); 2003(158)ELT403(SC); JT2004(6)SC456; (2004)2MLJ73(SC); 2003(9)SCALE720; (2004)3SCC48

10 has then no application.' The Parliament has amended Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 by Finance Act, 2000 (10 of 2000) with effect from November 17, 1980 with a view to change the basis of the … and certain judicial pronouncements, Tariff Item 68 would not be applicable. The Assistant Collector by an order dated 11.7.1983 held: 'Considering all aspects, the cold rolled strips known as box strapping continue to be cold rolled strips

Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionService Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 116 and 117; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 158; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rules 2(1); Service Tax (Amendment) Rules, 1997; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 64(3), 65, 65(5), 65(28), 65(41), 66, 66(3), 67, 68, 68(1), 69, 69(2), 69(5), 70, 70(1), 71, 71A, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 and 94; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 68(1A) and 84; Finance Act, 1998; Service Tax (Amendment) Rules, 1998; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 246(1); Punjab Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1952 - Sections 3(3); Service Tax Act, 1994

Reported in : AIR2005SC3020; (2005)4CompLJ440(SC); (2005)194CTR(SC)428; 2005(99)ECC377; 2005(182)ELT33(SC); [2005]274ITR194(SC); JT2005(Suppl3)SC389; (2005)4SCC214; 2006[3]STR608; 200

to costs. Constitution - constitutional validity - Article 14 of Constitution of India, Sections 116 and 117 of Finance Act, 2000, Section 158 of Finance Act, 2003, Rule 2 (1) of Service Rules, 1994 - petitioner challenging constitutional validity of

indodan Industries Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax/Vat

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 9, 9(1), 9(2) and 9(2B); Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 119, 120 and 120(2); General Sales Tax Law

Reported in : 2009(13)SCALE421; 2009(10)LC4845(SC)

on 12th May, 2000 by the Finance Act of 2000 is retrospective? and(2) Whether Section 120 of the Finance Act, 2000 which was a validating Act was invalid inasmuch as it purports to validate a provision which had never … 1. In this batch of Civil Appeals, the following issues arose for determination before the Allahabad High Court:(1) Whether

O.K. Play (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise-ii, New Delh ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 11A, 11A(1), 11A(2), 11A(3) and 35L; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9, 9(2) and 173G; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975 - Rule 6; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 97, 97B and 110

Reported in : AIR2005SC1031; 2005(98)ECC633; 2005(180)ELT291(SC); JT2005(2)SC208; (2005)2SCC555

not levied or not paid or short levied or short paid or erroneously refunded - Retrospective validation by Finance Act, 2000 of action taken under Section 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944.---------------------------------------------------Subject: Retrospective validation of action takenunder Section 11A … question which arises for determination in these civil appeals filed under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is - whether powdering of Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) and High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) granules into moulding powder

The Commissioner of Income Tax and Vs. Brindavan Beverages Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(14), 2(19AA), 2(42C), 41[2], 45, 48, 50B, 80IA(4), 80IB(4), 80IB(5), 80HHC, 80HHC(3), 80HHC(3A), 80HHC(4), 80HHC(4A), 115A, 115B, 115BB, 115C, 115J, 115JA, 115JA[1], 115JA[2], 115JA[4], 115JB, 143(2), 161[1A], 164, 164A, 207, 208, 209, 209[1], 210, 211, 215, 234, 234A, 234B, 234C, 234G, 254(2) and 260A; Finance [No. 2] Act, 1996; Finance Act, 1997; Finance Act, 1998; Finance Act, 1999; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 2; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 210; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1) and 17(1); Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : (2010)228CTR(Kar)1; [2010]186TAXMAN233(Kar)

of the Act for the purpose of computing advance tax and the rate is provided in part-III of Finance Act, 2000 is a clear indication of the scheme of legislature not to compel an assessee to do an impossible … D.V. Shylendra Kumar 1. This is an appeal of the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') directed against the order dated 31.03.2005 passed

Nava Bharat Ferro Alloys Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 65(7), 65(18A), 65(18B), 65(48), 116 and 117; Finance Act, 1997; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 66 68, 70, 71A and 94; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 68, 68(1), 69, 70, 71 and 71A; Assam Taxation (On Goods Carried by Road or on Inland Waterways) Act; Central Tea Act - Sections 3(1) and 3(2); Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 43, 43(1), 43(1A) and 44; Rajasthan Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1959 - Sections 3 and 4; Karnataka Entertainments Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2; Expenditure Tax Act, 1987; British North America Act, 1867 - Sections 91 and 92; Finance Act, 1998 - Sections 65, 65(16), 65(17), 65(41) and 66(3); Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 84; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rule 2 and 2(1); Service Tax (Amendm

Reported in : (2005)186CTR(AP)451; 2005(185)ELT236(AP); 2006[3]STR565

of service tax by users of clearing and forwarding agents service and users of goods transport service. By Finance Act, 2000, the Parliament amended the provisions for the limited period of 16.7.1997 to 16.10.1998 to enable collection of tax … self assessment of the service tax and the provisions of Section 71 shall apply accordingly.In Finance Act of 2000, Section 117 lays down:117. Validation of certain action taken under Service Tax Rules. - Notwithstanding anything contained in any … For the purpose of facts, we give reference to Writ Petition No. 1478 of 2004 and also to the counter filed in the same Writ

Shree Rajasthan Texchem Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 2008(229)ELT50(Raj)

of the case, the Tribunal was right in coming to the conclusion that under Section 112(2)(b) of the Finance Act, 2000 interest can be levied even without there being adjudication of show cause notice, which are pending decision at … facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in coming to the conclusion that under Section 112(2)(b) of the Finance Act, 2000 interest can be levied even without there being adjudication of show cause notice,

Shree Fats and Proteins Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 119 and 120; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 9, 9(2), 9(2A) and 9(2B); Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 29, 37, 53, 58, 70 and 70(2); Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 - Sections 12; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 23(3); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 19(1)

Reported in : [2006]146STC310(Raj)

numbering 29, the petitioners have challenged the provisions of Sub-clause (2)(d) of the validation Clause 120 of the Finance Act, 2000 (Act No. 10 of 2000) be declared to be violative of Articles 14 and 19(l)(g) of the Constitution … petitioners have challenged the provisions of Sub-clause (2)(d) of the validation Clause 120 of the Finance Act, 2000 (Act No. 10 of 2000) be declared … 2000) be declared to be violative of Articles 14 and 19(l)(g) of the Constitution of India and of Section 9(2B) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The challenge to the validity of the aforesaid provisions is

Kanoria Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Karnataka

Subject : ExciseCivil

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57A, 57B and 57C to 57V; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 112; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2005(190)ELT295(Kar)

remains.3. However, the communication dated 19-6-2000 being on the premise that in terms of Section 112 of the Finance Act, 2000, such Modvat credit having been disallowed, the petitioner was advised to reverse the entry and it is only … Shylendra Kumar, J.1. These two writ petitions are by assessees under the provisions of the Central Excise Act, 1944 [for short, the Act] in the context of denial of what is known as Modvat credit which the