Advanced Search Results

C.I.T and Anr Vs. M/S Yokogawa India Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

set out below.5. Section 10A of the Act, as it stood prior to the amendment made by the Finance Act, 2000, (amendment effective from 1.4.2001) was as follows:“10A. (1) Subject to the provisions of this section, any profits and … from being an exemption section to a provision providing for deduction. Yet, Section 10A continued to remain in Chapter III of the Act which Chapter deals with incomes which do not form part of the total income. There

Nava Bharat Ferro Alloys Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 65(7), 65(18A), 65(18B), 65(48), 116 and 117; Finance Act, 1997; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 66 68, 70, 71A and 94; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 68, 68(1), 69, 70, 71 and 71A; Assam Taxation (On Goods Carried by Road or on Inland Waterways) Act; Central Tea Act - Sections 3(1) and 3(2); Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 43, 43(1), 43(1A) and 44; Rajasthan Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1959 - Sections 3 and 4; Karnataka Entertainments Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2; Expenditure Tax Act, 1987; British North America Act, 1867 - Sections 91 and 92; Finance Act, 1998 - Sections 65, 65(16), 65(17), 65(41) and 66(3); Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2; Finance Act, 1997 - Sections 84; Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rule 2 and 2(1); Service Tax (Amendm

Reported in : (2005)186CTR(AP)451; 2005(185)ELT236(AP); 2006[3]STR565

of service tax by users of clearing and forwarding agents service and users of goods transport service. By Finance Act, 2000, the Parliament amended the provisions for the limited period of 16.7.1997 to 16.10.1998 to enable collection of tax … transporters. The act of transport does not merely involve personal services of transporters but also vehicles and fuel. Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 provide for levy of service tax on utilisation of transport services by … List II (State List). In respect of the matters enumerated in List III (Concurrent List) both Parliament and State Government have powers to make laws.

Commissioner of Income Central Ii Vs. Suresh N. Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 4, 4(1), 32, 32(2), 68, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C, 112, 113, 115A, 115AB, 115AC, 115ACA, 115AD, 115B, 115BB, 115BBA, 115E, 115JB, 132, 132A, 132B, 139, 139(1), 142, 142(1), 143, 143(1B), 143(2), 143(3), 144, 147, 148, 158B, 158BA, 158BA(1), 158BA(2), 158BB, 158BB(1), 158BC, 158BH, 161, 161(1A), 164, 164A, 167B, 245D and 245D(4); Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 2(1), 2(2) and 2(3); Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 113; Finance Act, 1995; Constitution of India - Articles 269, 270 and 271

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(SC)274; [2008]297ITR322(SC); JT2008(1)SC208; 2008(1)SCALE99; (2008)4SCC362; 2008AIRSCW1066

appeal.Points for determination:4. Two points arise for determination: Whether on the facts and circumstances of this case, the Finance Act, 2001 ('FA' for short) was applicable to 'block assessment' under Chapter XIV-B in respect of the search carried … ('1961 Act') for the 'block period' comprising of previous years relevant to 10 assessment years, i.e., 1991-92 to 2000-01, including the period from 1.4.2000 to 17.1.2001.FACTS3. On 17.1.2001 a search under Section 132 of the 1961 Act

Cit Vs. Kei Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

the undertaking) to which this section applies shall not be included in the total income of the assessee."The Finance Act, 2000 substituted Sections 10A and 10B. Substituted Section 10A reads as follows: "10A. (1) Subject to the provisions of … which, however, were rejected by the AO who was of the opinion that as Section 10B was in Chapter-III of the Act, under the heading ―incomes which do not form part of total income‖, legislative intent was

Honeywell International (India) Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)108TTJ(Delhi)924

the tax is payable under the provisions of the Act.Section 10A of the Act, as substituted by the Finance Act, 2000, w.e.f.1st April, 2001, provides for deduction in respect of profits and gains derived by the eligible industrial undertaking … the provisions of Section 10A has laid much consideration on the fact that Section 10A is included in Chapter III of the IT Act which is titled as "Incomes which do not form part of total income". He

Lason India Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Vs. the Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)301ITR306(Chennai)

included by application of the provisions of this Section as it stood immediately before its substitution by the Finance Act, 2000, the undertaking shall be entitled to the deduction referred to in this sub-Section only for the unexpired period … things or computer software: The Section has clearly employed the expression "deduction" though Section 10B is contained in Chapter III which deals with the incomes which do not form part of total income, but still at least after

The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Maha Laxmi Sugar Mills Company ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2008)219CTR(Uttranchal)393

shall be treated as service provider (assessee), and not the Clearing Agent or customer.Thereafter, Section 117 of the Finance Act, 2000, came into force w.e.f. 1st April 2000, whereby certain action taken under service tax rules since the commencement … any person who, in the opinion of Central Excise Officer, is responsible for collecting service tax under this Chapter but who has not furnished a return under Sub-section (1), the Central Excise Officer may, before the expiry

Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Kolkata

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service Tax

service tax for the fiRs.time was introduced in India in the year 1994 under Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994. It has been amended from time to time, inter alia, by introducing more categories of services within … cause-cum-Demand Notice dated 21st April, 2006 demanding service tax of Rs.65.25 crores (approx.) for the period 1st October, 2000 to 31st March, 2005 and also a hearing notice dated 13th August, 2013 issued more than seven years

Wallfort Shares and Stock Brokers Vs. Ito

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)96ITD1(Mum.)

income received from a mutual fund was exempt under the provisions of section 10(33) of the Act in Chapter III of the Income Tax Act. The heading of Chapter III read "Incomes which do not form part of … House of Lords in the case of Lupton. In that case forward stripping had been banned by the Finance Act, 1960, but the House of Lords did not think that the subsequent amendment should prejudice or cloud the … relation to assessment orders under section 143(3) for assessment years 2001-2002 and 2000-2001 respectively. These appeals have been referred to us as a Special Bench

Wallfort Shares and Stock Brokers Vs. Income-tax Officer [Alongwith

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

income received from a mutual fund was exempt under the provisions of Section 10(33) of the Act in Chapter III of the Income-tax Act. The heading of Chapter III read "Incomes which do not form part of total … House of Lords in the case of Lupton. In that case forward stripping had been banned by the Finance Act, 1960, but the House of Lords did not think that the subsequent amendment should prejudice or cloud the … relation to assessment orders Under Section 143(3) for assessment years 2001-2002 and 2000-2001 respectively. These appeals have been referred to us as a Special Bench