Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 1999 section 78 · Page 1 of about 1,296 results (0.128 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 28 2009

Commissioner of Service Tax Vs. Delhi Gymkhana Club Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-28-2009

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35, 35D, 35E, 35E(5), 35G, 35H, 35L, 73, 75, 75A, 76, 77 and 78; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 66, 67 and 105; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957; Additional Duties of Excise (Textiles and Textile Articles) Act, 1978; Finance Act, 1999; Finance Act, 2003; Customs Act - Sections 129D(5); Custom and Central Excise Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988; Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (2009)226CTR(Del)384; [2009]19STJ87(Delhi); 2009[16]STR129; [2009]22STT343; (2009)25VST285(Delhi)

in respect of such matters as are specifically provided in this Act.7. Section 35G was introduced by the Finance Act, 1999 with effect from 11.5.1999 and Finance Act, 2003 with effect from 14.5.2003. We are concerned mainly with Sub-section … and 75 of the Act, was demanded by these show-cause notices. Penalty under Sections 75A, 76, 77 and 78 of the Act was also proposed. The respondent submitted reply to these show-cause notices challenging the proposed move

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 10 2003

Coromandel Fertilisers Limited Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Nov-10-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)90ITD344(Hyd.)

has brought in the necessary amendment under Section 43(6) (c) (i) (C) with effect from 1.4.2000 by the Finance Act, 1999. Section 43(6) (c) (i) (C) provides for the decrease, in a slump sale, of the w.d.v. of the assets … the Bombay High Court in Premier Automobiles Ltd. v. CIT (supra) with particular attention to pages 60, 71, 78 and 79 of the said decision. He further explained that this principle is now recognized in Explanation (2)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2015

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Commissioner Service Tax

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-17-2015

Subject : Service Tax

of failure to get registered and furnish prescribed returns in time; (v) Penalty should not be imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act. 1994, as amended on account of suppression of fact that service of Sale of … not be demanded and recovered under the proviso to the Section 73(1) read with Section 68 of the Finance Act, 1994 and Rule 6 of Service Tax Rules, 1994 and education cess under Section 95 of Finance Act

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 16 2025

Sri. Prajwal Revanna vs State by Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-16-2025

but which is unstamped, is admissible in criminal proceedings : Stamp Act, 1891 Section 14(4) [amended by the Finance Act, 1999, Section 109(3), Sch. 12, paras 3(1), (5)].] .1463. The primary evidence rule.-Under the‘primary evidence rule’ at common law [ … ante; and as to the exclusion of a tape recording under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act, 1984, Section 78 (as amended) (see para 1365 ante) as unfair evidence see R. v. H, 1987 Crim LR 4 (CC),

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 2002

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Gujarat State Fertilizers Co. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-19-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32A, 43(1), 43A and 43A(1)

Reported in : (2003)179CTR(Guj)266; [2003]259ITR526(Guj)

(No. 2) Act of 1967, with effect from April 1, 1967, whereas Section 32A was inserted by the Finance Act, 1976, with effect from April 1, 1976. Hence, the non obstante clause in Section 43A could not have … like Section 35(1)(iv) of the Act or Section 35(2)(ia) or Section 32(1)(iia) or Section 32(1)(vi) of the Act. 78. The controversy--whether the provisions of Section 32A of the Act prevail over those of Section 43A of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 2006

Lake City Service Centre Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-14-2006

Subject : Service Tax

December, 2003. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand and also imposed equivalent penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 and penalties under Section 76 & 75A. The appellant discharged their service tax liability and interest under … 16.7.97 and since the appellant started this C & F agent service for Indian Oil Corpn. from October, 1999 they were required to get themselves registered under the provisions of service tax and discharge their tax liability.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2014

Cce., Ahmedabad Vs. M/S. Om Sai Engg Works and Others

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Decided on : Apr-11-2014

Subject : Service Tax

3, and 5 of the above Table, the original adjudicating authority imposed penalties under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on the respondents for evasion of service tax during the said

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2006

Zee Telefilms Ltd. and Star India Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-13-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2006)(110)ECC582

imposition of penalty under various provisions of Finance Act, 1944 is not called for and is unsustainable. Further, Section 78 during the relevant time read as under: If the Central Excise Officer in the courts of any proceedings … calculated by reference to the appropriate rate card.2.3 Extract of the relevant statutory provision of Chapter V of Finance Act, 1994 relating to advertising agency service, as they exist, at the material time are: advertising agency" means, any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2019

M/S Concert Capital Ltd vs the Income Tax Officer

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-12-2019

be the subject matter of a regular appeal. It was found that, section 143(1) as substituted by the Finance Act, 1999, w.e.f. 1st June, 1999, had dispensed with intimation permitting any 'prima facie adjustment' to the returned income. Intimation

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2002

Escotal Mobile Communications Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-15-2002

Subject : Sales TaxService Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65(72) and 67; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 248

Reported in : [2002]126STC475(Ker); 2006[2]STR567

Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994. A penalty of Rs. 7,40,480 was imposed on the petitioner under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 and a further penalty of Rs. 100 for every day for which there … gross value of service charges and that it had duly, complied with the law, both KGST Act and Finance Act.6. In the meanwhile, the Central Board of Excise and Customs, issued circular No. 23/3/97 dated October 13, 1997 … service tax on the activation charges. By a notice dated May 18, 1999 (vide exhibit P1), the Superintendent of Central Excise, Service Tax Range, Ernakulam

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial