Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Zam Zam Tanners
Allahabad
Jul-11-2005
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961- Sections 2(24), 17, 28, 41, 44, 45, 59, 80HHC, 139(1), 139(3), 143(1A), 143, 144, 147, 160(1), 256(2), 271, 271(1) and 280D; ;Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975; ;Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 271(1); ;Finance Act, 1993 - Sections 143(1A); ;Constitution of India - Article 141
(2005)197CTR(All)221; [2005]279ITR197(All)
have been concealed or inaccurate particulars have been furnished.'Section 271(1)(c) of the Act has been further amended by Finance Act, 2002, by which Clause (iii) and Expln. 4 has been modified. After the amendment section reads as follows … sum chargeable to income tax under Clauses (ii) and (iii) of Section 28 or Section 41 or Section 59;(va) the value of any benefit or perquisite taxable under Clause (iv) of Section 28;(vi) any capital gains chargeable
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Income Tax and Vs. Brindavan Beverages Ltd.
Karnataka
Sep-30-2009
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(14), 2(19AA), 2(42C), 41[2], 45, 48, 50B, 80IA(4), 80IB(4), 80IB(5), 80HHC, 80HHC(3), 80HHC(3A), 80HHC(4), 80HHC(4A), 115A, 115B, 115BB, 115C, 115J, 115JA, 115JA[1], 115JA[2], 115JA[4], 115JB, 143(2), 161[1A], 164, 164A, 207, 208, 209, 209[1], 210, 211, 215, 234, 234A, 234B, 234C, 234G, 254(2) and 260A; Finance [No. 2] Act, 1996; Finance Act, 1997; Finance Act, 1998; Finance Act, 1999; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 2; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 210; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1) and 17(1); Constitution of India - Article 141
(2010)228CTR(Kar)1; [2010]186TAXMAN233(Kar)
in Sub-section 42-C of Section 2 of the Act only with effect from 1-4-2000, as inserted by the Finance Act 1999 and which reads as under:2(42-C) 'Slump sale' means the transfer of one or more undertakings as a result … Section 115JA of the Act which is only to augment the revenue to the State.Re: ITA Nos. 320, 597 & 325 of 2004.41. The above three appeals arise out of the single order dated 8-1-2004 passed by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMerit Enterprises Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Apr-26-2006
Direct Taxation
(2007)288ITR226(Hyd.)
clear, and they mandated the levy of surcharge. In this context, he referred to the provisions of annual Finance Act, 1999, Schedule-I, which clearly mandated that the income-tax levied in terms of Section 113 shall be increased by a … the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Kesoram Industries & Cotton Limited v. CWT 59 ITR 767, and in the case of State of Kerala v. Alex George and Anr. 271 ITR 290,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Cybertech Systems and Software Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Apr-07-2005
Service Tax
(2007)106TTJ(Mum.)257
to be noted that both in Section 80HHE and in the amended provision of Section 10B introduced by Finance Act, 2000 the exemption/deduction is available to items which are exported or transmitted from India by "any other means". … no netting off of interest receipts and payments.27. The CIT(A) followed the same pattern for the asst. yr. 1999-2000 also wherein he has again declined the benefit of Section 10P entirely.The benefit of Section 80HHE has been … No. 319/Mum/2002, dt. 29th Aug., 2002) reported at (2004) 83 TTJ (Mumbai) 597--Ed. It was held that customization of baan standard software was eligible for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDatamatics Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Feb-14-2007
Direct Taxation
(2008)110ITD24(Mum.)
current income and since a bona fide dispute was pending which, was clarified by the legislature by the Finance Act, 1999, imposition of interest under Section 234B was not justified without a hearing and without reasons.52. The same principle, … dt. 21st March, 1995 was Rs. 8,39,528. Assessee paid TDS at Rs. 4,48,873 and advance tax of Rs. 59,00,000. An amount of Rs. 68,06,075, including interest of Rs. 13,17,288 under Section 244A was refunded. There was no
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohan Breweries and Distilleries Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai
Oct-31-2007
Direct Taxation
(2008)114TTJ(Chennai)532
facts of the case. These order were delivered before the amendment to Section 80-IA. By amendment by the Finance Act, 1999 w.e.f. 1st April, 2000, Section 80-IA(2) was introduced which has given the option to the assessee to opt
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMulcaire Vs. Phillips
UK Supreme Court
Jul-04-2012
Education
Since then Parliament has (by section 59 of and Schedule 3 to the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999) amended a considerable number of different statutory provisions of this type so as to introduce a prohibition on … commercially confidential information. This includes private and/or confidential information relating to her clients' personal lives and relationships, health, finances, incidents in which the police have become involved, personal security or publicity issues, commercial business transactions, professional relationships
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaharashtra State Electricity Board Vs. Maharashtra Electricity Regula ...
Mumbai
Feb-11-2004
Electricity
Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 17(5), 27 and 29; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 45, 49 and 59
AIR2004Bom294; 2004(3)BomCR485
(Supply) Act, 1948. On the application made by MSEB on 15th October, 1999, the Commission for the first time issued a tariff order on 5th … the powers under Section 15 of the ERC Act.iv) The Commission did not properly consider the provisions of Section 59 of the Electric Supply Act and the notification issued by the Government of Maharashtra in pursuance thereof providing … and the tariffs should have been so approved that there would be no recovered revenue gap in the finances of the Board. In our opinion, there can be no doubt that the affairs of Electricity Board are
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPremier Automobiles Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Nov-18-2002
Land Acquisition
(2003)84ITD169(Mum.)
that slump sales are assessable to tax only by virtue of amendment made in the statute book by Finance Act, 1999 which is prospective in operation. Since the instant sale took place prior to that, it is not taxable. … Article V of the joint venture agreement (internal p. 21 of p. 59 of the paper book (1) filed by the assessee) to submit that … IT authorities have erred in law and on the facts of the case in taxing Rs. 46,78,000 under Section 41(1) of the Act".The learned counsel of the assessee contended that the amount of Rs. 46,78,000 has been
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGodrej and Boyce Mfg.Co.Ltd. Mumbai. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax,
Mumbai
Aug-12-2010
Income Tax
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 14A(1)(2)(3); Income Tax Act, 1922 - Section 8; Finance Act of 2001 - Section 14A; Finance Act 1997 - Section 10(33)
form part of the total income under the Act. Section 14A was introduced by an amendment to the Finance Act of 2001 with retrospective effect from 1 April 1962. Subsections (2) and (3) were inserted by the Finance … under Section 14A. Reading Section 14 in juxtaposition with Sections 15 to 59, it is clear that the words "expenditure incurred" in Section 14A refers … income. The Commissioner (Appeals) following earlier decisions in the case of the assessee for Assessment Years 199899 and 19992000 held that no expenditure was attributable to the earning of the dividend received and consequently, deleted the disallowance.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »