Advanced Search Results

The International Association For Protection Of Intellectual Property ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Intellectual Property

section 89A of the Trademarks Act, 1999 (“TM Act” hereafter). The applicant urges that Section 184 of the Finance Act, 2017, prescribes the term of office and the conditions of service of Chairperson and members of various tribunals … and their respective jurisdictions and powers were incorporated into seven existing tribunals, reducing the number of tribunals from 26 to19. Thirdly, under Section 184 of the Finance Act, the Central Government was authorized to frame delegated legislation

Premier Automobiles Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1999; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(14), 2(42C), 45 to 50, 55 and 230A

Reported in : (2003)182CTR(Bom)202; [2003]264ITR193(Bom)

'slump sale' under Section 2(42C) was not there as that definition came on the statute book only under Finance Act, 1999, w.e.f. 1st April, 2000. The concept of slump sale initially was evolved under judge-made law which has been … Tribunal, dt. 18th Nov., 2002, in ITA No. 3580/Mum/1999, Premier Auto Ltd. has filed this appeal under Section 260A of the IT Act, 1961. The appeal pertains to asst. yr. 1995-96. Facts 2. Premier Auto Ltd. is

KSB Aktiengesellschaft and Another Vs. Anil Agarwal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

internationally well-known trade mark with a presence in India (KSB Aktiengesellschaft and Anr. v KSB Real Estate and Finance Private Limited; Notice of Motion No.4019 of 2007 in Suit No.2930 of 2007; decided on 11th February 2008). … the public into believing that the Defendant is in some way connected/ associated with the Plaintiffs." Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 29 Entitlement to Relief Application is filed for reliefs in both infringement and passing off Plaintiffs restricts her … Plaintiffs have four distinct registrations on 9th October 1958, 24th October 1975, 26th September 1996 and 3rd September 1997. There is the question of use.

Commissioner of Customs versus M/S Canon India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.202

in the case of Mangali Impex’s case expounds the correct interpretation of s.28(11) and whether s.97 of the Finance Act, 2022, which retrospectively validates the show cause notices with effect from 01.04.2023, is manifestly arbitrary and thus, violative … in Mangali Impex’s case failed to take into account the policy being followed by the Customs department since 1999 which provides for the exclusion of jurisdiction of all other proper officers once a show cause notice by … Such entrustment could be either conditional or unconditional - Object of this Section is to confer powers of search, seizure, arrest and recording of statements, … appointed as the officers of customs vide Notification No. 19/90-Cus (N.T.) dated 26.04.1990 - This notification later came to be superseded by Notification No. 17/2002

B and Brothers Engineering Works Chhakodia Mahadev Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1998 - Sections 88, 88(1), 90(1) and 90(2); Finance Act, 1993 - Sections 93; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2005)197CTR(Guj)306; 2005(185)ELT119(Guj); [2006]282ITR474(Guj)

1 is entitled to the benefit of the Karvivad Samadhan Scheme 1998 as brought into force by the Finance Act No. II of 1998 and that therefore the payment made by the petitioner No. 1 on 30.3.999 be … (Annexure : B) on 27.3.1999, but on 27.3.1999 (Saturday) the Bank remained closed due to strike, 28th March, 1999 was the Sunday and 29th March, 1999 was public holiday i.e. 'Bakri Eid'. Thus, on these two public … and the necessary certificate be issued to the petitioner No. 1 under Section 90(2) of the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998. (B) Your Lordships may … the said amount as determined by the designated Authority on or before 26.3.1999. Instead, the petitioner No. 1 Company paid it on 30.3.1999 as, on

Vivek Narayan Sharma Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court in the case of Rojer Mathew (supra) considered the question, as to whether Section 184 of the Finance Act, 2017, which does not prescribe qualifications, appointment, term and conditions of service, salary and allowances, etc. suffers from … Regulations, 2015 [Notification No.FEMA6(R)/RB-2015, dated the 29th December, 2015]. made under the provisions of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (42 of 1999) and the conditions specified therein are complied with. 1113. Some of the writ petitions were … 110-158 Precedents construing the word “any”…………………. Paras 112-127 Purposive interpretation …………………………………… Paras 128-143 Construction of sub-section (2) of Section 26 of the RBI Act……………………………………………………….. Paras 144-157 X. ISSUE No.(ii)……………………………………………….. Paras 159-211 Precedents considering delegated legislation ……….. Paras 162-193

infosys Technologies Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)86ITD342(Bang.)

it to even rope in the benefit arising from an ESOP. The insertion of Section 17(2)(c)(iiia) by the Finance Act, 1999, was only by way of an abundant caution. The proviso introduced to Section 17(2)(c)(iii) by Finance Act, 2000, … in an ongoing manner. In the case of E.D. Sasoon & Co. Ltd. and Ors. v. CIT (1954) 26 ITR 27 (SC), the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that unless and until the assessee acquires a right to

Tangerine Electronics Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Indian Chemicals and ors. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 26; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 60(1)

Reported in : AIR2004Bom198; 2004(2)ALLMR551; 2004(5)BomCR673; 2004(2)MhLj305

this decision, the Court has mainly adverted to the provisions of Section 26 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, to conclude that the tenant has no right to sublet or transfer the premises held by him, whether … doubted the correctness of the view of another learned Single Judge in the case of Veetrag Investments and Finance Co. v. Premier Brass and Metal Works Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, 2002 (3) M.L.J. 455 (Veetrag Investments I) and

Veetrag Investments and Finance Company Vs. Premier Brass and Metal Wo ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 60; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 2000 - Sections 26 and 56

Reported in : AIR2003Bom217; 2003(1)ALLMR493; 2003(2)BomCR812; 2003BomCR(Cri)521; 2003(1)MhLj458

not operate.11. Founding himself in this proposition. Mr. Palan submitted that Section 26 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to '1999 Act') contains an absolute bar against the tenant to sublet or give on licence … other property.21. Mr. Palan, relied upon a judgment of this Court in the case of Veetrag Investments & Finance Co. v. Premier Brass & Metal Works Pvt. Ltd. and Seksarla Sons Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai, reported in (2002)

M/s. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax

trade mark or patent or a person entitled to a use thereof in terms of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. He submits that the object and purpose sought to be achieved by the Trade Marks Act, 1999 must … For all these reasons, he submits that the questions be answered accordingly. 26. Mr. V. A. Sonpal appearing on behalf of the Revenue, on the … was legally justified in holding that the amount of Rs.8,34,781/- as per hire purchase agreement dated 7.2.1996 hire financed in favour of Shri. Ajit Singh Bhimrao was liable to tax under Section 8 of the B.S.T. Act,