Advanced Search Results

Larsen and Toubro Limited Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Bihar Finance Act, 1981 - Sections 2, 13, 17(2), 17(3), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 21, 21(1), 47 and 58; Central Sales Tax Act; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act - Sections 5; Bihar Sales Tax Rules, 1983 - Rules 13, 13A, 15(3) and 18; Rajasthan Sales Tax Rules - Rule 29(2); Sales Tax (Amendment) Rules, 2000 - Rule 13A; Sales Tax (Amendment) Rules, 2006 - Rule 13A

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR2126; [2008(3)JCR698(Jhr)]; (2009)24VST233(Jharkh)

the petitioner challenging the order of re-assessment dated 5/5/2006 passed under Sections 17(3) and 19 of the Bihar Finance Act. The writ petition was dismissed by this Bench on 27/11/2006 holding that the petitioner may avail the statutory … order accordingly.3. Besides challenging the re-assessment order dated 5/5/2006 for the period, 1999-2000, the petitioner also challenged the vires of Rule 13A of the Bihar … two years, the petitioner was surprisingly served with a notice purported to be under Section 17(2) read with Section 19(1) of the Act whereby the petitioner was directed to appear before the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes with

American Hotel and Lodging Association Educational Institute Vs. Centr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1998; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(20A), 10(22), 10(22B), 10(23C), 11, 11(1), 11(5), 12, 12AA, 13, 60 to 63 and 245Q(1); Finance Act, 2001; Finance Act, 2002; Finance Act, 2007; Central Boards of Revenue Act, 1963; Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 2CA

Reported in : (2008)216CTR(SC)377; [2008]301ITR86(SC); JT2008(6)SC379; 2008(7)SCALE588; (2008)10SCC509; 2008AIRSCW4996

scope of enquiry by the Prescribed Authority under Section 10(23C)(vi) read with the third proviso thereto inserted by Finance Act, 1998 w.e.f. 1.4.1999. In this case, Central Board of Direct Taxes ('CBDT') being the Prescribed Authority, at the … enquiry by the Prescribed Authority under Section 10(23C)(vi) read with the third proviso thereto inserted by Finance Act, 1998 w.e.f. 1.4.1999. In this case, Central Board of Direct Taxes ('CBDT') being the Prescribed Authority, at the relevant

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

referred to. This Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 r/w Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 challenges the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short “CESTAT”) dated … Central Excise Appeal No.214/ 2013 are referred to. This Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 r/w Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 challenges the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service

Shree Rajasthan Texchem Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 2008(229)ELT50(Raj)

notices were issued, and interim stay were granted. The writ petitions were filed during the period 1997 to 1999. It was during pendency of these writ petitions, that the Finance Act, 2000 came to be passed, which … of the case, the Tribunal was right in coming to the conclusion that under Section 112(2)(b) of the Finance Act, 2000 interest can be levied even without there being adjudication of show cause notice, which are pending decision … case of India Cements Ltd. v. CC & CE, Hyderabad reported in 1997 (95) ELT-520, and Jindal Polymers v. Commissioner of Central Excise Indore reported

The International Association For Protection Of Intellectual Property ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Intellectual Property

section 89A of the Trademarks Act, 1999 (“TM Act” hereafter). The applicant urges that Section 184 of the Finance Act, 2017, prescribes the term of office and the conditions of service of Chairperson and members of various tribunals … incumbent Chairperson of the board stating that his appointment was made under section 89A of the Trademarks Act, 1999 (“TM Act” hereafter). The applicant urges that Section 184 of the Finance Act, 2017, prescribes the term of

Merit Enterprises Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)288ITR226(Hyd.)

clear, and they mandated the levy of surcharge. In this context, he referred to the provisions of annual Finance Act, 1999, Schedule-I, which clearly mandated that the income-tax levied in terms of Section 113 shall be increased by a … problem is the rate of surcharge applicable. To illustrate, if the search took place on, say April 4, 1996, whether the rate of surcharge is to be adopted as applicable to the assessment year 1996-97 or the

Coral Cosmetics Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Finance Act, 1999 - Sections 131 and 132; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 37 and 37(2); Central Excise Rules, 1944; Central Excise (Amendment) Rules, 1997 - Rule 57F and 57F(17); Companies Act, 1956; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 141

Reported in : 2009[16]STR371

V.C. Daga, J.1. The petitioners seek to challenge the constitutional validity of Section 131 and 132 of the Finance Act, 1999. By Section 131 of the Finance Act, Clause (xxviii) was inserted in Section 37(b) of the Central Excise … J.1. The petitioners seek to challenge the constitutional validity of Section 131 and 132 of the Finance Act, 1999. By Section 131 of the Finance Act, Clause (xxviii) was inserted in Section 37(b) of the Central Excise

Garrick D'Silva Vs. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)105TTJ(Delhi)445

more specific provision i.e. sub-Clause (iii)(a) of Clause 2 of Section 17 was introduced de novo by the Finance Act, 1999 w.e.f. 1st April, 2000 whereby the income represented by arising an exercise of stock option was exigible to … appeal is directed by the assessee against the order of the CIT (A) pertaining to the asst. yr. 1998-99 on following grounds: The learned CIT (A) has erred on facts and in law in upholding the following

Virtual Soft Systems Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-i

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28(1), 48, 143, 143(1), 143(1A), 260A, 271 and 271(1); Finance Act, 1975; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 271; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975; Finance Act, 1993; Finance Act, 1992; Finance Act, 1951; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 23(5), 28 and 28(1); Constitution of India - Article 20(1)

Reported in : (2007)207CTR(SC)733; [2007]289ITR83(SC); JT2007(3)SC125; 2007(2)SCALE612; (2007)9SCC665

the Punjab and Haryana High Court pertaining to the assessment year 1970-71 was prior to the amendment of Finance Act, 1975 and therefore, was not applicable. For the same reason, the decision of this Court in affirming the … Court of Delhi against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short 'the Tribunal') under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act. Assessee also filed ITA No. of 2004 being aggrieved against a part … deleting the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') merely on the ground that the total income

Amritha Cyber Park (P) Ltd. Vs. Kerala Financial Corporation

Court : Kerala

Subject : Property

Acts : Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968 - Sections 69, 69(2) and 71; Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1999 - Sections 19 and 34(2); UP Public Monies (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972; State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 29, 31 and 32G; Industrial Finance Corporation Act, 1948; Unit Trust of India Act, 1963;Industrial Reconstruction Bank of India Act, 1984;Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985;Small Industries Development Bank of India Act, 1989

Reported in : [2007]136CompCas446(Ker); 2006(2)KLT394

shall be in addition to, and not in derogation of, the Industrial Finance Corporation Act, 1948 (15 of 1948), the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 … of the petitioner is that after commencement of the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1999, hereinafter called the 'DRT Act', the debt above Rs. 10 lakhs could be recovered by financial institutions only … lakhs could be recovered by financial institutions only by approaching the Debt Recovery Tribunal through an application under Section 19 of the DRT Act. Counsel for the petitioner also relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in