Advanced Search Results

Jeet Ram Kishore and ors. Vs. Sunder Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 12(1), 23A and 151 - Order 6, Rules 5, 10(4), 15, 17 and 18; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1973 - Section 111; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Sections 7 and 16; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Section 16(2) - Order 6, Rule 17; ;Bengal Finance Sale Tax Act; ;Customs Act, 1962 - Section 111; ;Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act - Sections 6(1), 6(7), 13 and 13A; ;Income Tax Act; ;Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987; ;Press Council Act 1978; ;Parliament Act

Reported in : AIR2005HP21

Sales Tax, New Delhi, : [1978]3SCR98 , while dealing with the Bengal Finance Sale Tax Act, it was observed as under :--'Now, if there is … as the case may be, inserted or substituted by Section 16 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1999 and by Section 7 of this Act shall not apply to in respect of any pleading filed before … of penalty. Whereas learned Counsel appearing for the respondents contended that although the term Value' was not in Section 111 (m) of the Act before the amendment but that will make no difference as to him even without

Coromandel Fertilisers Limited Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)90ITD344(Hyd.)

has brought in the necessary amendment under Section 43(6) (c) (i) (C) with effect from 1.4.2000 by the Finance Act, 1999. Section 43(6) (c) (i) (C) provides for the decrease, in a slump sale, of the w.d.v. of the assets

Kamal Singh Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Customs

of July, 1999.The cut off date of 1-7-99 was inserted in Section 130 by Section 111 of the Finance Act, 1999. The final order in the present case has been passed after that date and hence no reference lies

Noble Asset Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)(112)ECC457

been made applicable to certain designated areas in the EEZ and the continental shelf. The provisions of the Finance Act have not been made applicable at all and consequently the duties leviable under the said Finance Act could … inspection was made on reverse of the Shipping Bill. l) In April, 1999, Noble, by a letter informed the Customs about the repairs having been … following liabilities have been arrived on various appellants, before us: (i) Rig Noble Jimmy Puckett/Essar Explorer confiscated under Section 111(d), (f),(g),(h) and (o) and under Section 113(d), (f), (g) and (h) of the Customs Act,1962 and was allowed

Federation of Karnataka Chambers of Commerce and Industry vs the Gover ...

Court : Karnataka

Electricity Board (KEB) who were transferred to KPTCL and ESCOMs upon the enactment of the Karnataka Electricity Reforms Act 1999. The second Proviso to Section 15 of the Reforms Act 1999 provides for any transfer scheme to be … and the petitioner's claim that Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 should have appealed to the Appellate Tribunal under Section 111 of the Electricity Act 2003 is unfounded.Point No. 4:45. The short point that survives for consideration is thecontention … Companies (ESCOMs). They claim that until the State Government makes the necessary financial arrangements, KPTCL should continue to cover the retirement benefits for these employees.

Premier Automobiles Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2003)84ITD169(Mum.)

that slump sales are assessable to tax only by virtue of amendment made in the statute book by Finance Act, 1999 which is prospective in operation. Since the instant sale took place prior to that, it is not taxable. … order. The CIT(A) confirmed the action of the AO. Paras 25 to 111 (pp. 13 to 66) of CIT(A)'s order deal with this issue in … IT authorities have erred in law and on the facts of the case in taxing Rs. 46,78,000 under Section 41(1) of the Act".The learned counsel of the assessee contended that the amount of Rs. 46,78,000 has been

M/S. Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited Vs. the Commissione ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Customs

Ramanan contested the challenge to jurisdiction relying on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Sundaram Finance vs. Commissioner of Customs reported in 2012 (279) E.L.T. 220 (Tri.-Chennai) and the decision of the Tribunal in … Bills of Entry (Bs/E No. 596, 599 and 600 all dated 05.03.1999) were held liable for confiscation under Section 111(m) of Customs Act, 1962. Since, the goods were not available for confiscation, a fine of Rs. 10,00,000/- was

Hassan Thermal Power Pvt. Ltd., Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Arbitration

by the Commission involves a very highly technical requiring working knowledge of finance, commerce, economics and management. It would be more appropriate and effective if … or taken under the corresponding provisions of this Act. the to refer the matter 64 Karnataka Electricity Reform Act, 1999 Section 2 relates to Definitions Sub-section (e) deals with Licence as under:-"(e) Licence means a license granted under Section … Chaudhari for the petitioner contended as follows: (i) that even though petitioner has a remedy of Appeal under Section 111 of Act, 2003 against the order of the KERC dated 17.12.2018, petitioner has not chosen to invoke alternative

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Asea Brown Boveri Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)11TTJ(Mum.)502

that Section 50B has retroactive effect is not correct. According to him, Section 50B was introduced by the Finance Act, 1999 w.e.f. 1st April, 2000. According to him, the Notes on Clauses, the Memo Explaining the Provisions of the

Harbhajan Singh. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Himachal Pradesh Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1971 - Sections 2(7), 4, 14, 16(1), 15(1), 32, 35, 54

Officers. The High Court found that the Deputy Commissioner, Kangra, had submitted a report dated 04.01.1999 to the Finance Commissioner-cum-Secretary (Revenue), Government of Himachal Pradesh, in which the extent of cultivable land of private land-owners in Revenue … and others v. The State of Punjab and others [AIR 1966 Punjab 111], in which the expression "at any time" in Section 36 of East … Himachal Pradesh, issued a notice under Section 14 of the Himachal Pradesh Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1971 (for short `the Act') declaring that in the interest of general public and better cultivation of agricultural