Advanced Search Results
Chem Teak Company Vs. State of Kerala and ors.
Kerala
Aug-05-2002
Sales Tax
Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 10, 10(3) and 59A
[2003]131STC427(Ker)
was struck down as violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. Thereafter Section 59-A was substituted by the Finance Act, 2000 as per which the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes is given power to issue clarifications. The said section … industrial unit registered with the Industries Department, It started commercial production of treated rubber wood on May 29, 1995. It is an assessce to sales tax under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act on the files of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Comissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City-ix, Bombay Vs. Shri J.V. Ko ...
Mumbai
Jun-30-1998
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24), 10(13), 15, 16, 17(3), 41, 44, 45, 59, 192(5), 256(1) and 280-D; Finance Act, 1995
1998(4)BomCR821; [1999]235ITR239(Bom)
this anomaly and with a view of bringing such receipts within the provisions of the law, by the Finance Act, 1995, amended section 17(3)(ii) of the Act to restrict the exclusion from the definition of 'profits in lieu of … aforesaid; (v) any sum chargeable to income-tax under Clauses (ii) and (iii) of section 28or section 41 or section 59; (v-a) the value of any benefit or perquisite taxable under Clause (iv) of section 28; (vi) any capital
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadras Bar Association Vs. Union Of India
Supreme Court of India
Jul-14-2021
Land Acquisition
the Tribunal Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) Ordinance, 2021 and Sections 184 and 186 (2) of the Finance Act, 2017 as amended by the Tribunal Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) Ordinance, 2021 as ultra vires Articles … to Section 184(1) is a direct affront to the judgment of this 59 | Pa ge Court in MBA-III. This Court in MBA-I and Roger … JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.1. The Madras Bar Association has filed this Writ Petition seeking a declaration that Sections 12 and 13 of the Tribunal Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) Ordinance, 2021 and Sections 184 and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Scottish Widows plc (Appellant) Vs. Commissioners for Her Majesty's Re ...
UK Supreme Court
Jul-06-2011
MRTP
or section 83(3) of the Finance Act 1989, as substituted by paragraph 16 of Schedule 8 to the Finance Act 1995 and paragraph 4 of Schedule 31 to the Finance Act 1996. If it falls within the scope either … is helpful to look back into the legislative history. Lord Wilberforce said in Farrell v Alexander [1977] AC 59, 73 that self-contained statutes, whether consolidating previous law or so doing with amendments, should be interpreted, if reasonably
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmit Hemendra Jhaveri Vs. Union of India
Mumbai
Oct-13-2015
Direct Taxation
for the Assessment Years 1994-95 and 1995-96, were pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). 4. The Finance Act, 1998 introduced the KVSS, 1998 with effect from 1 September, 1998 providing for settlement of tax disputes pending … India v. NITDIP Textiles Processors (P.) Ltd. [2011] 203 Taxman 1/15 taxmann.com 59 at paragraphs 17 and 18 as under:â” '17:- The object and purpose … is rejected in respect of the Assessment Years 1993-94, 1994-95 and 1995-96; and (b) the Constitutional validity of Section 95 of the KVSS, 1998. 2. The petition was admitted on 2 May 2000 at which time, the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadura Coats Limited Vs. Central Board of Excise and Customs and Commi ...
Chennai
Sep-30-2003
Excise
Constitution of India - Article 226
2004(163)ELT164(Mad)
indicating that such cloth would be classifiable under Clause 59.03. The position continued till 1995, when under the Finance Act, 1995, Note 2(c) of Chapter 59 was withdrawn, thus, reverting the position to pre-1989 stage. However, thereafter the Board … of Excise and Customs, as ultra vires on the ground that such circular violates the provisions contained in Section 37B of the Central Excise Act (hereinafter called as 'the Excise Act'), Note 2 of Chapter 59 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbn Amro Bank Nv Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata
Jun-17-2005
Direct Taxation
(2005)96TTJ(Kol.)1041
contrary view overruling the Tribunal decision considering the Explanation to Section 90(2) of the Act, inserted by the Finance Act, 2001." 39. The relevant facts relating to this issue are that the AO had levied tax in this … except for the years covered by Board's letter dt. 21st Nov., 1994." 59. It is evident from the letter dt. 24th Nov, 1994, that the … 1. These 4 appeals of the assessee relating to asst. yrs. 1992-93, 1993-94, 1994-95 and 1995-96 involving some common issues are disposed of by this consolidated order.2. The appellant is a branch of ABN
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMerit Enterprises Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Apr-26-2006
Direct Taxation
(2007)288ITR226(Hyd.)
to various years covered by the block assessment. We find that second proviso to Section 7(2) of the Finance Act, 1995, specifically provides that "the amount of income-tax computed in accordance with the provisions of Section 112 or 113 … the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Kesoram Industries & Cotton Limited v. CWT 59 ITR 767, and in the case of State of Kerala v. Alex George and Anr. 271 ITR 290,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaruti Udyog Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jan-21-1998
Excise
(1998)(101)ELT675TriDel
to be charged to tax, if any, exists all along. The amount of the liability depends upon the Finance Act of the year concerned.' The Court further held that 'the assessment to income-tax only particularises the amounts; it … and imposed a penalty of an equal amount under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944.2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants supply
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Super Associates and M/S. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Apr-27-2001
Excise
(2001)(76)ECC294
yarn into multi folded yarn prior to the introduction of chapter note 3 to Chapter 54 introduced by Finance Act, 1995 was not dutiable as it did not amount to a process of manufacture. There are large number of … M/s Super Associates under Rule 9(2) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 read with proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944. There is confirmation of interest on the duty in terms of Section … by his Order-in-Original No. 2/99 dated 3.6.99 confirming duty demand of Rs. 59,22,148/- on M/s Super Associates under Rule 9(2) of Central Excise Rules, 1944
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »