Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 1994 section 99 · Page 1 of about 1,720 results (0.073 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 25 2004

Parbhudas Kishoredas Tobacco Products Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-25-2004

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Reported in : (2009)20VST853(MP)

the provisions of Rule 2(d)(xii) and (xvii) of the Rules as amended in 1997 are ultra vires the Finance Act, 1994 as far as they made persons other than clearing and forwarding agents responsible for collecting the service tax … decree or order of any court, Tribunal or other authority. By providing validation in the Finance Act, 2000, Section 116 of the said Act, the Government has also amended the definition of the term 'assessee'. It has

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2000

Lucknow Grih Swami Parishad Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-20-2000

Subject : Service TaxCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975 - Sections 2(2), 25, 25(2), 30, 44, 52 to 64, 66(4), 72, 96, 97, 98, 99, 99(2), 100; Constitution of India - Articles 47, 51A, 243 and 288(1); Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 5(1) and 59(1); Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act; State Municipal Act; Panchayat Act; Uttar Pradesh Mahapalika Adhiniyam, 1959 - Sections 114, 173, 173(2), 269 to 271; Uttar Pradesh Nagar Mahapalika Water Supply Rules, 1968 - Rules 10, 11 and 25 to 30; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65(6)

Reported in : 2000(3)AWC2139; (2002)3UPLBEC2351

Act, 1975. could not be Imposed unless supply of water by Jal Sansthan was notified under Section 66. Finance Act, 1994. and provisions of service-tax will not apply. He argued that unless the service to supply water was made … Jal Sansthan submits that rules. In force prior to commencement of the Act. 1975, continue by virtue of Section 99 and that they have provided tariffs strictly in accordance with the same. In absence of relevant pleadings by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2025

M/S. Ganesh Shankar Environmental Solutions vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-20-2025

by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it could … appearing for respondents 4 to 7 in W.P.No.21379/2021; Sri Hema Kumar K, learned AGA appearing for respondent - 99 - No.1, Sri K.S.Mallikarjun Reddy, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, Smt. Vanita K.R., learned counsel appearing for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 20 2025

M/S Neelanjana Enterprises vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-20-2025

by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it could … appearing for respondents 4 to 7 in W.P.No.21379/2021; Sri Hema Kumar K, learned AGA appearing for respondent - 99 - No.1, Sri K.S.Mallikarjun Reddy, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, Smt. Vanita K.R., learned counsel appearing for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2025

M Soma Reddy vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-20-2025

by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it could … appearing for respondents 4 to 7 in W.P.No.21379/2021; Sri Hema Kumar K, learned AGA appearing for respondent - 99 - No.1, Sri K.S.Mallikarjun Reddy, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, Smt. Vanita K.R., learned counsel appearing for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2025

M/S Shodashi Enterprises vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-20-2025

by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it could … appearing for respondents 4 to 7 in W.P.No.21379/2021; Sri Hema Kumar K, learned AGA appearing for respondent - 99 - No.1, Sri K.S.Mallikarjun Reddy, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, Smt. Vanita K.R., learned counsel appearing for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2025

R. Shankar Reddy vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-20-2025

by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it could … appearing for respondents 4 to 7 in W.P.No.21379/2021; Sri Hema Kumar K, learned AGA appearing for respondent - 99 - No.1, Sri K.S.Mallikarjun Reddy, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, Smt. Vanita K.R., learned counsel appearing for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2025

M N Mayanna Gowda vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-20-2025

by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it could … appearing for respondents 4 to 7 in W.P.No.21379/2021; Sri Hema Kumar K, learned AGA appearing for respondent - 99 - No.1, Sri K.S.Mallikarjun Reddy, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, Smt. Vanita K.R., learned counsel appearing for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2025

M/S Sri Balaji Enterprises vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-20-2025

by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it could … appearing for respondents 4 to 7 in W.P.No.21379/2021; Sri Hema Kumar K, learned AGA appearing for respondent - 99 - No.1, Sri K.S.Mallikarjun Reddy, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, Smt. Vanita K.R., learned counsel appearing for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2025

M/S Sri Manjunatheshwara Enterprises vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-20-2025

by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it could … appearing for respondents 4 to 7 in W.P.No.21379/2021; Sri Hema Kumar K, learned AGA appearing for respondent - 99 - No.1, Sri K.S.Mallikarjun Reddy, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, Smt. Vanita K.R., learned counsel appearing for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial