Advanced Search Results
Parbhudas Kishoredas Tobacco Products Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India ...
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-25-2004
Sales Tax/VAT
(2009)20VST853(MP)
the provisions of Rule 2(d)(xii) and (xvii) of the Rules as amended in 1997 are ultra vires the Finance Act, 1994 as far as they made persons other than clearing and forwarding agents responsible for collecting the service tax … decree or order of any court, Tribunal or other authority. By providing validation in the Finance Act, 2000, Section 116 of the said Act, the Government has also amended the definition of the term 'assessee'. It has
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLucknow Grih Swami Parishad Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Apr-20-2000
Service TaxCivil
Uttar Pradesh Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975 - Sections 2(2), 25, 25(2), 30, 44, 52 to 64, 66(4), 72, 96, 97, 98, 99, 99(2), 100; Constitution of India - Articles 47, 51A, 243 and 288(1); Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 5(1) and 59(1); Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act; State Municipal Act; Panchayat Act; Uttar Pradesh Mahapalika Adhiniyam, 1959 - Sections 114, 173, 173(2), 269 to 271; Uttar Pradesh Nagar Mahapalika Water Supply Rules, 1968 - Rules 10, 11 and 25 to 30; Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65(6)
2000(3)AWC2139; (2002)3UPLBEC2351
Act, 1975. could not be Imposed unless supply of water by Jal Sansthan was notified under Section 66. Finance Act, 1994. and provisions of service-tax will not apply. He argued that unless the service to supply water was made … Jal Sansthan submits that rules. In force prior to commencement of the Act. 1975, continue by virtue of Section 99 and that they have provided tariffs strictly in accordance with the same. In absence of relevant pleadings by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Ganesh Shankar Environmental Solutions vs State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Feb-20-2025
by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it could … appearing for respondents 4 to 7 in W.P.No.21379/2021; Sri Hema Kumar K, learned AGA appearing for respondent - 99 - No.1, Sri K.S.Mallikarjun Reddy, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, Smt. Vanita K.R., learned counsel appearing for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M/S Neelanjana Enterprises vs State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Feb-20-2025
by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it could … appearing for respondents 4 to 7 in W.P.No.21379/2021; Sri Hema Kumar K, learned AGA appearing for respondent - 99 - No.1, Sri K.S.Mallikarjun Reddy, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, Smt. Vanita K.R., learned counsel appearing for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM Soma Reddy vs State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Feb-20-2025
by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it could … appearing for respondents 4 to 7 in W.P.No.21379/2021; Sri Hema Kumar K, learned AGA appearing for respondent - 99 - No.1, Sri K.S.Mallikarjun Reddy, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, Smt. Vanita K.R., learned counsel appearing for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Shodashi Enterprises vs State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Feb-20-2025
by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it could … appearing for respondents 4 to 7 in W.P.No.21379/2021; Sri Hema Kumar K, learned AGA appearing for respondent - 99 - No.1, Sri K.S.Mallikarjun Reddy, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, Smt. Vanita K.R., learned counsel appearing for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR. Shankar Reddy vs State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Feb-20-2025
by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it could … appearing for respondents 4 to 7 in W.P.No.21379/2021; Sri Hema Kumar K, learned AGA appearing for respondent - 99 - No.1, Sri K.S.Mallikarjun Reddy, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, Smt. Vanita K.R., learned counsel appearing for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM N Mayanna Gowda vs State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Feb-20-2025
by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it could … appearing for respondents 4 to 7 in W.P.No.21379/2021; Sri Hema Kumar K, learned AGA appearing for respondent - 99 - No.1, Sri K.S.Mallikarjun Reddy, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, Smt. Vanita K.R., learned counsel appearing for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Sri Balaji Enterprises vs State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Feb-20-2025
by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it could … appearing for respondents 4 to 7 in W.P.No.21379/2021; Sri Hema Kumar K, learned AGA appearing for respondent - 99 - No.1, Sri K.S.Mallikarjun Reddy, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, Smt. Vanita K.R., learned counsel appearing for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Sri Manjunatheshwara Enterprises vs State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Feb-20-2025
by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it could … appearing for respondents 4 to 7 in W.P.No.21379/2021; Sri Hema Kumar K, learned AGA appearing for respondent - 99 - No.1, Sri K.S.Mallikarjun Reddy, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, Smt. Vanita K.R., learned counsel appearing for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »