Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 1994 section 96 · Page 1 of about 2,221 results (0.129 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 18 2009

Home Solution Retail India Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-18-2009

Subject : Service TaxProperty

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 64 to 96; Finance Act, 2007; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3

Reported in : 2009BusLR378(Del); (2009)223CTR(Del)191; 2009(164)LC297(Delhi); 2009(237)ELT209(Del); [2009]17STJ143(Delhi); 2009[14]STR433; [2009]20STT129; (2009)22VST508(Delhi)

circular a completely erroneous interpretation is placed on Section 65 (90a) and Section 65 (105) (zzzz) of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended by the Finance Act, 2007. It is further alleged that because of this incorrect interpretation, service … provisions of the said act are pointed out. Chapters V and VA which comprise of Sections 64 to 96-I of the Finance act, 1994 pertain to provisions for service tax. Section 65 of the said Act is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 2001

Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs. Joint Cit

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-20-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)74TTJ(Mumbai)624

interest on loans and advances under section 2(7) of the Interest Tax Act, 1974 (as amended by the Finance Act, 1994).4. Assessing officer in the assessment for assessment year 1992-93, referred to the definitions of debentures and bonds as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2008

The Commissioner of Income-tax and Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Mar-31-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)216CTR(Uttranchal)86

Income Tax Act, wherever they are inconsistent. 11. Paragraph E of Part I of First Schedule of the Finance Act, 1994 provides the rate of income tax for the companies for the Assessment Year 1994-95. The relevant portion of … 1. This Appeal, preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is directed against the judgment and order dated 26th February 2006

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 13 2000

Smt. Gulab Sundri Bapna Vs. Dy. Cit

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-13-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2001]79ITD455(Delhi)

sought to tax. It is important in this connection to note that section 55(2)(a) was substituted by the Finance Act, 1994 with effect from 1-4-1995 including the tenancy rights, inter alia within the definition of 'capital asset' having cost

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 2025

State of Kerala & Another versus Asianet Satellite Communications ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-22-2025

Reported in : [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2215

of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution and also liable to pay service tax under provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended from time to time as a provider of a taxable service namely broadcasting service within the … Phrases - “Broadcasting” and “Broadcasting agency or organization” - Prasar Bharti (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990 - Section 2(c) - Finance Act, 1994 as amended by the Finance Act, 2001 - Section 65(13). [Para 17.14-17.18] Constitution … Tax Act, 1996: .. 94 iii. Gujarat Entertainments Tax Act, 1977: .................. 96 iv. Jharkhand Entertainment Tax Act, 2012: .............. 104 v. Kerala Tax on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2025

M/S Neelanjana Enterprises vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-20-2025

by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it could … appearing for respondent No. 1, Sri. S.N.Prashanth Chandra, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, Sri. B.S.Venkatanarayana, learned - 96 - counsel appearing for respondent No.3, Sri Akash B. Shetty, learned counsel appearing for respondents 4 to 6

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2025

R. Shankar Reddy vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-20-2025

by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it could … appearing for respondent No. 1, Sri. S.N.Prashanth Chandra, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, Sri. B.S.Venkatanarayana, learned - 96 - counsel appearing for respondent No.3, Sri Akash B. Shetty, learned counsel appearing for respondents 4 to 6

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2025

M/S Sri Balaji Enterprises vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-20-2025

by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it could … appearing for respondent No. 1, Sri. S.N.Prashanth Chandra, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, Sri. B.S.Venkatanarayana, learned - 96 - counsel appearing for respondent No.3, Sri Akash B. Shetty, learned counsel appearing for respondents 4 to 6

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2025

M/S Sri Manjunatheshwara Enterprises vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-20-2025

by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it could … appearing for respondent No. 1, Sri. S.N.Prashanth Chandra, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, Sri. B.S.Venkatanarayana, learned - 96 - counsel appearing for respondent No.3, Sri Akash B. Shetty, learned counsel appearing for respondents 4 to 6

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2025

M/S R P B Enerprises vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-20-2025

by the petitioners that the SolidWaste Management are not amongst those activities chargeable under Section 66-B of the Finance Act, 1994, as the activities are part of the negative list of services - 87 - and accordingly, it could … appearing for respondent No. 1, Sri. S.N.Prashanth Chandra, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, Sri. B.S.Venkatanarayana, learned - 96 - counsel appearing for respondent No.3, Sri Akash B. Shetty, learned counsel appearing for respondents 4 to 6

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial