Advanced Search Results
Cc And Ce And St Noida Vs. M/s Interarch Building Products Pvt. Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
May-02-2023
Service Tax
construction, erection etc. under the category "commercial or industrial constructions services" as referred under Section 65(105)(zzq) of the Finance Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act, 1994’). 2.2 Based on specific intelligence that the respondent had wrongly classified … 7 of 64 8 73A of the Act, 1994 along with the appropriate rate of interest under Sections 73B and 75 of the Act and the penalties be imposed under Sections 77 & 75 of the Act,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Farmers Fertilizer Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Oct-25-2005
Service Tax
(2006)2STR194
under which demand of Rs. 14,26,231/- of service tax under the provisions of Section 73, Chapter V of Finance Act, 1994, was confirmed, a penalty of equal amount was imposed and payment of interest ordered.2. The authorities below held … cause why service tax amounting to Rs. 14,26,231/- should not be demanded and recovered from them under Section 73B(it should be under Section 73(1) Chapter V) of the Finance Act, 1994 along with interest and penalty under
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Chandra Kasliwal Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
May-07-2004
CivilProperty
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4; ;Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959 - Sections 82; Jaipur Development Authority Act - Sections 45
RLW2004(3)Raj1788; 2004(4)WLC17
Regulation of slaughter houses arid tanneries. 243X. Power to impose taxes by and Funds of, the Municipalities.- xxx243Y. Finance Commission. - xxx243Z. Audit of accounts of Municipalities- xxx243ZA. Elections to the Municipalities.-xxx243ZB. Application to Union territories. - … for District Planning-A District Planning Committee constituted under the provisions of Section 121 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (Act No. 13 of 1994) shall be deemed to be the Committee constituted under Article 243ZD of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Chowgule and Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Sep-21-1995
Customs
(1995)(80)ELT680TriDel
under the direction of the Central Board of Excise & Customs which is part of the Ministry of Finance. This was not denied by the Revenue. Therefore, it appears that the Government intended to include Dredgers in … Bureau Veritas, N.K.K., D.N.V. This affidavit has been filed before us in 1994 and the Revenue has not contested the technical details of the vessel … issued by the Government, the Dredgers are to be classified under Item 73B at a machinery and not as an item falling within 76.1. We … in 1974) from Japan. (iii) After import, the vessel was registered under Section 34 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 (part V) & a certificate of Indian Registry No. 2194, dated 28-10-1986 was issued. This certificate is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSrj Securities Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Jan-06-2003
Direct Taxation
Details of purchase and sales of shares in 112 scrips i.e., ACC Ltd., Benzo Petro, Dewan Housing and Finance Ltd., GTC Ind. Ltd., Maral Overseas Ltd., Sanghi Polyester, Sterlite Communication, Uniplas Ltd., V.P. Polycon Ltd., Rathi Ispat … the business.10. Another argument that was raised during the course of hearing was that provisions of explanation to Section 73B are not applicable for the reason that the assessee is an investment company and, therefore, the losses that … facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the action of the authorities below in treating the business loss of Rs. 37,40,568
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›