Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 1992 section 70 · Page 1 of about 1,363 results (0.109 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 07 2016

Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Kolkata

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-07-2016

Subject : Service Tax

service tax for the fiRs.time was introduced in India in the year 1994 under Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994. It has been amended from time to time, inter alia, by introducing more categories of services within … including the decision of this court in Indian Cardboard Industries-vs.-Collector reported in 1992 (58) ELT508 it was observed as follows:“Power of judicial review, under Article … that by reason of omission or failure on the part of the assessee, to make a return under Section 70 for any prescribed period or to disclose wholly or truly all material facts required for verification of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2006

A.H. Baldota Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-31-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)103TTJ(Mum.)517

off this loss against his income from other sources and/or under other head after the amendment made by Finance Act, 1992. This is relevant because unless a partner has share of loss assessable in his hands under the head … the firm is entitled to set off the losses against income under other sources or under other head. Section 70 also does not make any distinction between a firm or any other assessee, i.e., firm is treated like

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 2019

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-13-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

CJI1 Leave granted. BRIEF BACKGROUND:2. In the present batch of cases, the constitutionality of Part XIV of the Finance Act, 2017 and of the rules framed in consonance has been assailed. While it would be repetitious to reproduce … Supreme Court shall hold office until the attainment of the age of 70 years. CAT:4. In the case of the Central Administrative Tribunal, we clarify … the High Court of Kerala. The petitioner had originally approached the High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 13 (5- A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest (SARFAESI) Act,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 09 2004

In Re: Infoquest Software Exports

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : Jul-09-2004

Subject : MRTP

the public issue of ISEL, he and his family members had entered into an agreement with M/s Arihant Finance Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "AFC") for a financing arrangement for Rs. 70 lakhs and that their role … and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 1995, read with Sections 11 and 11B of SEBI Act, 1992 should not be passed against them..5. A reply to the said notice was received vide letter dated July … and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 1995, read with Sections 11 and 11B of SEBI Act, 1992 should not be passed against

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 30 2007

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Mangalam Cement Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : May-30-2007

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)7STR673

in one case (Service Tax Appeal No. 2/23 of 2005) of Rs. 60,26,508/- under Section 73(2) of the Finance Act, 1994, imposing penalty of Rs. 48,700/- under Section 76 and ordering interest amount of Rs. 8,84,287/- under Section … the decision of the Supreme Court in Laghu Udyog Bharati, reported in 1992 (112) ELT 365 (SC) as followed by the Tribunal in L.H. Sugar … liability under Section 73 covered the cases of the assessees who were liable to file their returns under Section 70 and that, therefore, the present assessees were not liable to pay tax. It was also urged that even

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 2001

Shree Fats and Proteins Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-13-2001

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 119 and 120; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 9, 9(2), 9(2A) and 9(2B); Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 29, 37, 53, 58, 70 and 70(2); Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 - Sections 12; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 - Sections 23(3); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 19(1)

Reported in : [2006]146STC310(Raj)

numbering 29, the petitioners have challenged the provisions of Sub-clause (2)(d) of the validation Clause 120 of the Finance Act, 2000 (Act No. 10 of 2000) be declared to be violative of Articles 14 and 19(l)(g) of the … could not override the limitation to levy interest as set out in Clause (b) of Sub-section (2) of Section 70 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act. The submission has been made that demand amount of CST was paid … to be assessed pertaining to its sales tax liability for the year 1992-93, vide, order dated February 20, 1996. The original assessment was made by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2004

In Re: Cyberspace Ltd.

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : Aug-17-2004

Subject : MRTP

of the bank account statements of some of these entities viz. M/s Amit Interchemicals P. Ltd, M/s Pradeepak Finance & Mgmt Consultants P. Ltd, M/s Shivam Multi Services P. Ltd, M/s Nucleus Softel P.Ltd, M/s Kamrao Plastique … Market) Regulations, 1995, (hereinafter referred to as "the Regulations") read with section 11 and 11B of the SEBI Act, 1992 and directed him to reply to the said notice within 15 days of the receipt thereof. It was … and regulation. x. He stated that he was a senior citizen aged 70 years and for the last 10 years, was an investor in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 02 1998

Rajinder Kumar Somani Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jun-02-1998

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1999)(113)ELT111TriDel

1. The Service Tax was introduced w.e.f. 1-7-1994. Section 69 of the Finance Act, 1994 requires registration of persons responsible for collecting service tax. The appellant, being a share broker, was so … The appellant got himself registered under Section 69 on 5-1-1995. He, thereafter, submitted quarterly returns, as required under Section 70 of the said Act. All these returns showed "nil tax collected". Five show cause notices were issued on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2003

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. B. Narasimha Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-31-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(23), 64, 64(1) and 182(3)

Reported in : 2003(4)ALT244; (2003)185CTR(AP)219; [2003]263ITR62(AP)

imperative to notice under Section 64(1)(iii) of the Act, as it stood prior to its omission by the Finance Act, 1992, with effect from April 1, 1993 :'64. Income of individual to include income of spouse, minor child, etc.--(1) … off against his other income or carried forward and set off in accordance with the provisions of Sections 70 - 75. (3) When any of the partners of a registered firm is a non-resident, the tax on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 2022

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (exemptions) Vs. Ahmedabad Urban ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-19-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1989, w.e.f. 01.04.1990; and further amended by the Finance (No.2) Act, 1991, w.r.e.f. 01.04.1990; Finance Act, 1992, w.r.e.f. 01.04.1990/w.e.f. 01.04.1992; and Finance Act, 2000, w.e.f. 1-4-2001. 24 Deletion of the expression “not involving the carrying … 1983 and 1991) ............................... 17 E. The judgment in Thanthi Trust .................................................................................................................. 18 F. Deletion of certain exemptions: Section 10 (20A) and Section 10 (23) ................................................... 20 G. Amendments to Section 2 (15) by Finance Act, 2008 … statute ............................................................................ 63 B. Interpretation of Section 2(15), the definition clause ............................................................................... 70 Summation of interpretation of Section 2(15) ............................................................................................... 85 C. Sections 10, 11,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial